banner
Short and Sharp (Blue)
295 decks (0.05786%)
Price History
Short and Sharp (Blue)
Ninja,assassin Attack Reaction
Choose 1; Target dagger attack gains +1{p}. Target attack action card with 2 or less base {p} gains +1{p}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.522.518589233
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.522.519391967
Hero
Nuu
Nuu
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nuu that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Benji, the Piercing Wind
Benji, the Piercing Wind
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Arakni
Arakni
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arakni that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Uzuri
Uzuri
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Uzuri that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Equipment
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Blade Cuff
Blade Cuff
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blade Cuff that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Mask of Wizened Whiskers
Mask of Wizened Whiskers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Wizened Whiskers that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Shriek Razors
Shriek Razors
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Heirloom of Snake Hide
Heirloom of Snake Hide
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Heirloom of Snake Hide that play both.
Breaking Scales
Breaking Scales
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
Vest of the First Fist
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Mask of Many Faces
Mask of Many Faces
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Many Faces that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Fleet Foot Sandals
Fleet Foot Sandals
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Fleet Foot Sandals that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
Mask of Three Tails
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Silken Gi
Silken Gi
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Silken Gi that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
Breeze Rider Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Pouncing Paws
Pouncing Paws
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Deep Blue
Deep Blue
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
Stride of Reprisal
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Skycrest Keikoi
Skycrest Keikoi
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Skycrest Keikoi that play both.
Koi Blessed Kimono
Koi Blessed Kimono
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Koi Blessed Kimono that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Graven Call that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Tiger Taming Khakkara
Tiger Taming Khakkara
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Zephyr Needle
Zephyr Needle
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Biting Breeze (Yellow) that play both.
First Tenet of Chi: Moon
First Tenet of Chi: Moon
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and First Tenet of Chi: Moon that play both.
First Tenet of Chi: Wind
First Tenet of Chi: Wind
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and First Tenet of Chi: Wind that play both.
Water the Seeds (Blue)
Water the Seeds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Water the Seeds (Blue) that play both.
Gravekeeping (Blue)
Gravekeeping (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Gravekeeping (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.687500000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Plunge (Yellow)
Plunge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Plunge (Yellow) that play both.
Plunge (Blue)
Plunge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.012.012345679
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Plunge (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Blue)
Hurl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.253968254
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hurl (Blue) that play both.
Stab Wound
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.338028169
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Stab Wound that play both.
Plunge (Red)
Plunge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.357142857
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Plunge (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Bleed Out (Red)
Bleed Out (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.082.075000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bleed Out (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.316666667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.192.187500000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.727272727
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Bleed Out (Yellow)
Bleed Out (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bleed Out (Yellow) that play both.
Bleed Out (Blue)
Bleed Out (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.288461538
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bleed Out (Blue) that play both.
Head Jab (Blue)
Head Jab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Head Jab (Blue) that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.392156863
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Yellow)
Hurl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hurl (Yellow) that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.444444444
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Already Dead that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Impulsive Desire (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Head Jab (Yellow)
Head Jab (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Head Jab (Yellow) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.518518519
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.971.966101695
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.581395349
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.381.375000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.250000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Be Like Water (Blue)
Be Like Water (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Be Like Water (Blue) that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Infiltrate that play both.
Malign (Red)
Malign (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Yellow)
Be Like Water (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Be Like Water (Yellow) that play both.
Rising Tide
Rising Tide
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Rising Tide that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.571.571428571
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nix the Nimble (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Fleece the Frail (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
One-Two Punch (Blue)
One-Two Punch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and One-Two Punch (Blue) that play both.
Twin Twisters (Blue)
Twin Twisters (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Twin Twisters (Blue) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Annihilate the Armed (Blue) that play both.
Prowl (Yellow)
Prowl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Prowl (Yellow) that play both.
Regicide
Regicide
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Regicide that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Deadly Duo (Blue)
Deadly Duo (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Deadly Duo (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Eradicate that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Tidal Surge
Tidal Surge
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Tidal Surge that play both.
Spillover
Spillover
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Spillover that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Blue)
Impulsive Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Impulsive Desire (Blue) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mind's Desire (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Yellow)
Bonds of Memory (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bonds of Memory (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Yellow)
Bonds of Attraction (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bonds of Attraction (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Short and Sharp (Red)
Short and Sharp (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.092.090000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Short and Sharp (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.296875000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Short and Sharp (Yellow)
Short and Sharp (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.247863248
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Short and Sharp (Yellow) that play both.
Knives Out
Knives Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.346534653
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Knives Out that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.352941176
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Razor Reflex (Blue)
Razor Reflex (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.325301205
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Yellow)
Razor Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.225352113
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.746031746
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.741.736842105
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.416666667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Blue)
Venomous Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.428571429
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Blue) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.380000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Hiss (Yellow)
Hiss (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hiss (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Cut to the Chase (Blue) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.432432432
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
1.561.555555556
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Siren's Call
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Siren's Call that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Intimate Inducement (Blue) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.551.545454545
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Yellow) that play both.
Lunging Press
Lunging Press
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Lunging Press that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Gorgon's Gaze
Gorgon's Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Gorgon's Gaze that play both.
Tide Chakra (Red)
Tide Chakra (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Tide Chakra (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Yellow)
Venomous Bite (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.268292683
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Plague Hive that play both.