banner
Short and Sharp (Blue)
312 decks (0.05160%)
Price History
Short and Sharp (Blue)
Ninja,assassin Attack Reaction
Choose 1; Target dagger attack gains +1{p}. Target attack action card with 2 or less base {p} gains +1{p}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.492.491109426
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.522.518343688
Hero
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Nuu
Nuu
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nuu that play both.
Benji, the Piercing Wind
Benji, the Piercing Wind
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
New
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Arakni
Arakni
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arakni that play both.
Uzuri
Uzuri
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Uzuri that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
New
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
New
Cindra
Cindra
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Cindra that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Zen
Zen
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Zen that play both.
Equipment
New
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Blade Cuff
Blade Cuff
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blade Cuff that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
New
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Danger Digits that play both.
New
Leap Frog Vocal Sac
Leap Frog Vocal Sac
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Leap Frog Vocal Sac that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Tide Flippers that play both.
New
Red Alert Vest
Red Alert Vest
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Red Alert Vest that play both.
New
Leap Frog Slime Skin
Leap Frog Slime Skin
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Leap Frog Slime Skin that play both.
New
Leap Frog Gloves
Leap Frog Gloves
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Leap Frog Gloves that play both.
New
Leap Frog Leggings
Leap Frog Leggings
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Leap Frog Leggings that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mask of Wizened Whiskers
Mask of Wizened Whiskers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Wizened Whiskers that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
Vest of the First Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Shriek Razors
Shriek Razors
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Breaking Scales
Breaking Scales
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Pouncing Paws
Pouncing Paws
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Mask of Many Faces
Mask of Many Faces
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Many Faces that play both.
Heirloom of Snake Hide
Heirloom of Snake Hide
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Heirloom of Snake Hide that play both.
Fleet Foot Sandals
Fleet Foot Sandals
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Fleet Foot Sandals that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
Mask of Three Tails
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Silken Gi
Silken Gi
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Silken Gi that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
New
Starting Point
Starting Point
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Starting Point that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
New
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mask of Deceit that play both.
New
Red Alert Gloves
Red Alert Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Red Alert Gloves that play both.
New
Red Alert Visor
Red Alert Visor
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Red Alert Visor that play both.
New
Coat of Allegiance
Coat of Allegiance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Coat of Allegiance that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
Breeze Rider Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
Stride of Reprisal
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Deep Blue
Deep Blue
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Graven Call that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
New
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Zephyr Needle
Zephyr Needle
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Tiger Taming Khakkara
Tiger Taming Khakkara
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
New
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
New
Kunai of Retribution
Kunai of Retribution
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Action
New
Up Sticks and Run (Yellow)
Up Sticks and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Up Sticks and Run (Yellow) that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
New
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Dual Threat that play both.
New
Cut from the Same Cloth (Blue)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Cut from the Same Cloth (Blue) that play both.
New
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
New
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Biting Breeze (Yellow) that play both.
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
New
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
New
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
First Tenet of Chi: Moon
First Tenet of Chi: Moon
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and First Tenet of Chi: Moon that play both.
Attack Action
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Infect (Red) that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Pick Up the Point (Blue) that play both.
Plunge (Yellow)
Plunge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Plunge (Yellow) that play both.
Plunge (Blue)
Plunge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Plunge (Blue) that play both.
Stab Wound
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.337837838
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Stab Wound that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Blue)
Hurl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hurl (Blue) that play both.
Plunge (Red)
Plunge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.338028169
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Plunge (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.687500000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Bleed Out (Red)
Bleed Out (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.328125000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bleed Out (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.293103448
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
New
Poisoned Blade (Yellow)
Poisoned Blade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Poisoned Blade (Yellow) that play both.
New
Throw Yourself at Them (Blue)
Throw Yourself at Them (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Throw Yourself at Them (Blue) that play both.
New
Throw Yourself at Them (Yellow)
Throw Yourself at Them (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Throw Yourself at Them (Yellow) that play both.
New
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
New
Poisoned Blade (Blue)
Poisoned Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.200000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Poisoned Blade (Blue) that play both.
New
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Poisoned Blade (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
New
Scuttle the Canal (Blue)
Scuttle the Canal (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Scuttle the Canal (Blue) that play both.
New
Scuttle the Canal (Yellow)
Scuttle the Canal (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Scuttle the Canal (Yellow) that play both.
New
Whittle from Bone (Yellow)
Whittle from Bone (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Whittle from Bone (Yellow) that play both.
Bleed Out (Yellow)
Bleed Out (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bleed Out (Yellow) that play both.
Bleed Out (Blue)
Bleed Out (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bleed Out (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.200000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Head Jab (Blue)
Head Jab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Head Jab (Blue) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.370370370
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Impulsive Desire (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Yellow)
Hurl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hurl (Yellow) that play both.
Head Jab (Yellow)
Head Jab (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Head Jab (Yellow) that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.352941176
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Already Dead that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.601.600000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.490566038
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Malign (Red)
Malign (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.547619048
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Be Like Water (Blue)
Be Like Water (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Be Like Water (Blue) that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Infiltrate that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Be Like Water (Yellow)
Be Like Water (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Be Like Water (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nix the Nimble (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.441.444444444
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
New
Cut Through (Blue)
Cut Through (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Cut Through (Blue) that play both.
New
Grow Wings (Blue)
Grow Wings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Grow Wings (Blue) that play both.
New
Silver Talons (Blue)
Silver Talons (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Silver Talons (Blue) that play both.
New
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
New
Defang the Dragon
Defang the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Defang the Dragon that play both.
New
Extinguish the Flames
Extinguish the Flames
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Extinguish the Flames that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
New
Mark the Prey (Blue)
Mark the Prey (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mark the Prey (Blue) that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Yellow)
Pick Up the Point (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Pick Up the Point (Yellow) that play both.
New
Plunge the Prospect (Red)
Plunge the Prospect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Plunge the Prospect (Red) that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Red)
Reaper's Call (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Reaper's Call (Red) that play both.
New
Tip-Off (Red)
Tip-Off (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Tip-Off (Red) that play both.
New
Tip-Off (Yellow)
Tip-Off (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Tip-Off (Yellow) that play both.
New
Cut Through (Yellow)
Cut Through (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Cut Through (Yellow) that play both.
New
Bite (Red)
Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bite (Red) that play both.
New
Scuttle the Canal (Red)
Scuttle the Canal (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Scuttle the Canal (Red) that play both.
New
Whittle from Bone (Blue)
Whittle from Bone (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Whittle from Bone (Blue) that play both.
New
Blood Drop
Blood Drop
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blood Drop that play both.
New
Blood Line
Blood Line
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Blood Line that play both.
New
Burning Blade Dance
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
New
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Blue)
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Blue) that play both.
New
Grow Claws (Blue)
Grow Claws (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Grow Claws (Blue) that play both.
New
Hot on Their Heels
Hot on Their Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hot on Their Heels that play both.
New
Mark with Magma
Mark with Magma
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mark with Magma that play both.
New
Tag the Target (Blue)
Tag the Target (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Tag the Target (Blue) that play both.
New
Throw Yourself at Them (Red)
Throw Yourself at Them (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Throw Yourself at Them (Red) that play both.
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Fleece the Frail (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Annihilate the Armed (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Spring Tidings
Spring Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Spring Tidings that play both.
Twin Twisters (Blue)
Twin Twisters (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Twin Twisters (Blue) that play both.
Prowl (Yellow)
Prowl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Prowl (Yellow) that play both.
One-Two Punch (Blue)
One-Two Punch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and One-Two Punch (Blue) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Regicide
Regicide
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Regicide that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Soul
Aspect of Tiger: Soul
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Aspect of Tiger: Soul that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Rising Tide
Rising Tide
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Rising Tide that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Deadly Duo (Blue)
Deadly Duo (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Deadly Duo (Blue) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Mind's Desire (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Yellow)
Bonds of Memory (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bonds of Memory (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Short and Sharp (Red)
Short and Sharp (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.102.100000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Short and Sharp (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.283582090
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Short and Sharp (Yellow)
Short and Sharp (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.254098361
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Short and Sharp (Yellow) that play both.
Knives Out
Knives Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.352380952
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Knives Out that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.358490566
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Concealed Blade that play both.
New
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Razor Reflex (Blue)
Razor Reflex (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.317647059
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Yellow)
Razor Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.753846154
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.388888889
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
New
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
New
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.750000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Incision (Red) that play both.
New
Incision (Blue)
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Incision (Blue) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.377358491
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Blue)
Venomous Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.384615385
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Blue) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Cut to the Chase (Blue) that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.509803922
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.404761905
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
1.561.564102564
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Maul
Maul
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Maul that play both.
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Yellow) that play both.
Hiss (Yellow)
Hiss (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hiss (Yellow) that play both.
New
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
New
Incision (Yellow)
Incision (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Incision (Yellow) that play both.
New
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Perforate that play both.
New
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
New
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
New
To the Point (Blue)
To the Point (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and To the Point (Blue) that play both.
New
To the Point (Red)
To the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and To the Point (Red) that play both.
New
To the Point (Yellow)
To the Point (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and To the Point (Yellow) that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
New
Exposed
Exposed
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Exposed that play both.
New
Stains of the Redback (Blue)
Stains of the Redback (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Stains of the Redback (Blue) that play both.
New
Take a Stab (Red)
Take a Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Take a Stab (Red) that play both.
Lunging Press
Lunging Press
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Lunging Press that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Siren's Call
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Siren's Call that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Intimate Inducement (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.272727273
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
New
Hunted or Hunter
Hunted or Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Hunted or Hunter that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
New
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Lair of the Spider that play both.
New
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Den of the Spider that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Blue) and Plague Hive that play both.