Smack of Reality
Guardian Attack Action - Attack
Tower - If this has 13 or more {p}, non-equipment cards get -1{d} while defending this.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.224.215360349
Average Defense Value: Β
2.822.822526221
Hero
Valda, Seismic Impact
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Boots
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Civic Steps
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Hood
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Tectonic Plating
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Craterhoof
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Craterhoof that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Heart of Ice
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Heart of Ice that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Aurum Aegis
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Crown of Dominion
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcane Lantern
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Testament of Valahai
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Testament of Valahai that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Crater Fist
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Crater Fist that play both.
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Balance of Justice that play both.
Stand Ground
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Stand Ground that play both.
Coronet Peak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Coronet Peak that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Time Skippers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Time Skippers that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Anothos
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Anothos that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Redwood Hammer
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.902.901379310
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Tear Asunder that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Imposing Visage that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Promising Terrain that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.762.759689922
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Buckle that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Towering Titan (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Towering Titan (Blue) that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Show Time! that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Surface Shaking that play both.
Overswing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Overswing (Blue) that play both.
Ice Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Ice Quake (Red) that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Stamp Authority
Avg. played: Β
2.372.365853659
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Stamp Authority that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Midas Touch that play both.
Nerves of Steel
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Nerves of Steel that play both.
Draw a Crowd
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Draw a Crowd that play both.
Geyser of Seismic Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Geyser of Seismic Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Leave a Dent that play both.
Embolden (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Embolden (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Earthlore Empowerment (Red) that play both.
Never Yield
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Never Yield that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Truce that play both.
Crash Down (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Crash Down (Red) that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Command and Conquer that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.862.862478778
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Spinal Crush that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Oaken Old that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
2.812.814055637
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Mangle that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Put 'Em In Their Place
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Put 'Em In Their Place that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Crippling Crush that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and The Golden Son that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Star Struck that play both.
Frost Fang (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Frost Fang (Red) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Plow Under that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Headbutt that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Bet Big that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Captain of the Guard
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Captain of the Guard that play both.
Aftershock (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Aftershock (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Boulder Drop that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Ripple Away that play both.
Colossal Bearing
Avg. played: Β
2.542.539855072
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Colossal Bearing that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.461.458823529
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Pulverize that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Thump (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.775623269
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.912.913522013
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.882.882556131
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.405835544
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Solid Ground
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Solid Ground that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Trounce that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Seismic Eruption
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Seismic Eruption that play both.
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
1.711.708661417
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.411.413080895
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Remembrance that play both.
Blizzard
Avg. played: Β
2.092.091569767
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Blizzard that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.570743405
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Smack of Reality and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.