Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red)
Runeblade Action
Reveal the top 3 cards of your deck. Create a Runechant token for each Runeblade attack action card revealed this way, then put the cards on top of your deck in any order.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.112.108419267
Average Defense Value:
2.592.586101374
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Viserai
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Viserai that play both.
Viserai, Rune Blood
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
Vynnset
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vynnset that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Chane that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Equipment
Aether Ironweave
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Runehold Release
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runehold Release that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Crown of Providence
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Ebon Fold
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Bloodied Oval
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Face Purgatory
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Carrion Husk
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Carrion Husk that play both.
Dance of Darkness
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Mage Master Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Ironrot Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Weapon
Flail of Agony
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Flail of Agony that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Scepter of Pain
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Reaping Blade
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Annals of Sutcliffe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Annals of Sutcliffe that play both.
Rotwood Reaper
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rotwood Reaper that play both.
Action
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.443037975
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.407079646
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.360655738
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.691931540
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.748407643
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.671974522
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.687500000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.502024291
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played:
2.292.285714286
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.282.280000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reaping (Red) that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.662.660256410
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.592.588235294
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Eloquent Eulogy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Eloquent Eulogy that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.682.680000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.460674157
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodspill Invocation (Red) that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.382.384615385
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
2.732.730434783
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.330275229
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.302.304964539
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Tome of the Arknight that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Yellow) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
2.552.545454545
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sigil of the Arknight that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Blue) that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.407766990
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Red) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Seeds of Agony (Red) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lead the Charge (Yellow) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reaping (Blue) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodspill Invocation (Blue) that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Read the Runes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Read the Runes (Blue) that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) that play both.
Bequest the Vast Beyond
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bequest the Vast Beyond that play both.
Runic Reaping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reaping (Yellow) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Seeds of Agony (Yellow) that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Looming Doom that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Tear Through the Portal (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.385350318
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.232.228571429
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.393063584
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
2.592.589430894
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.573705179
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
2.242.243093923
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
2.602.595652174
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.322.315508021
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
2.592.594339623
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.682.683615819
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.471875000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.327800830
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.296296296
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hocus Pocus (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.585106383
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.332.327188940
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.462962963
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.662.662337662
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.353658537
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Strike (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Yellow) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.552.551351351
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.441340782
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Blue) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.415094340
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.536144578
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Red) that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.382.378787879
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Meat and Greet (Blue) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Strike (Blue) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Blue) that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Yellow) that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.539062500
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red) that play both.
Shadow of Ursur
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shadow of Ursur that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Blue) that play both.
Rift Skitter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rift Skitter (Red) that play both.
Drowning Dire (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Drowning Dire (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Yellow) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Meat and Greet (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hocus Pocus (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Duet (Red) that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reek of Corruption (Red) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rip Through Reality (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Yellow) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Duet (Blue) that play both.
Rune Flash (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rune Flash (Blue) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Soul Reaping
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Soul Reaping that play both.
Piercing Shadow Vise (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Piercing Shadow Vise (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.785046729
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.514150943
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.442.435643564
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oblivion that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arknight Shard that play both.