Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red)
Runeblade Action
Reveal the top 3 cards of your deck. Create a Runechant token for each Runeblade attack action card revealed this way, then put the cards on top of your deck in any order.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.132.128606433
Average Defense Value:
2.592.588461889
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Viserai
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Viserai that play both.
Viserai, Rune Blood
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
Vynnset
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vynnset that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Chane that play both.
Florian
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Florian that play both.
Aurora, Shooting Star
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Equipment
Aether Ironweave
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Crown of Providence
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Face Purgatory
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Runehold Release
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runehold Release that play both.
Bloodied Oval
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Ebon Fold
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Carrion Husk
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Carrion Husk that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Dance of Darkness
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Balance of Justice
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Mage Master Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Lightning Greaves
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Well Grounded
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Ironrot Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Flail of Agony
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Flail of Agony that play both.
Scepter of Pain
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Reaping Blade
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Rotwood Reaper
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rotwood Reaper that play both.
Annals of Sutcliffe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Annals of Sutcliffe that play both.
Star Fall
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Action
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.417293233
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.685567010
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.747572816
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.421052632
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Eloquent Eulogy
Avg. played:
2.802.800000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Eloquent Eulogy that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.662.661237785
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.416666667
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.642.640522876
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.452.451977401
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.582.583333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Runic Reaping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reaping (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.692.687500000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.382.375886525
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Yellow) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodspill Invocation (Red) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
2.712.714285714
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.330097087
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.312.313432836
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
2.522.517241379
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Tome of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Tome of the Arknight that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
2.692.685483871
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Condemn to Slaughter (Red) that play both.
Sigil of the Arknight
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sigil of the Arknight that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Blue) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Blue) that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Germinate that play both.
Thistle Bloom - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Thistle Bloom - Life that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.413043478
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lead the Charge (Yellow) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Seeds of Agony (Red) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reaping (Blue) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Read the Runes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Read the Runes (Blue) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodspill Invocation (Blue) that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reaping (Yellow) that play both.
Bequest the Vast Beyond
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bequest the Vast Beyond that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Looming Doom that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Earth's Embrace
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Earth's Embrace that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Strong Yield (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Strong Yield (Red) that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Tear Through the Portal (Red) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Seeds of Agony (Yellow) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.387755102
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
2.582.579166667
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.563786008
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.395638629
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
2.592.589285714
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
2.592.585714286
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.254545455
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.332.325842697
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.674285714
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.579234973
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.466898955
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.331818182
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hocus Pocus (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.642.644736842
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.332.330049261
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.467479675
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Blue) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.350000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Strike (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Yellow) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.542.543956044
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.440476190
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.537037037
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Red) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Blue) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.421768707
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.428571429
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Strike (Blue) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.372.368852459
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Meat and Greet (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Yellow) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Shadow of Ursur
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shadow of Ursur that play both.
Drowning Dire (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Drowning Dire (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Blue) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Yellow) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Yellow) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
Vantage Point (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.200000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantage Point (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hocus Pocus (Blue) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.525862069
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Meat and Greet (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Rift Skitter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rift Skitter (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Yellow) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Duet (Red) that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reek of Corruption (Red) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rip Through Reality (Red) that play both.
Rune Flash (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rune Flash (Blue) that play both.
Soul Reaping
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Soul Reaping that play both.
Deathly Duet (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Duet (Blue) that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Snuff Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Snuff Out that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Piercing Shadow Vise (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Piercing Shadow Vise (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Spike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanic Spike (Red) that play both.
Splintering Deadwood (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Splintering Deadwood (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Current Funnel that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.786184211
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.522167488
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.442.442105263
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oblivion that play both.
Fertile Ground (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fertile Ground (Red) that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Fertile Ground (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fertile Ground (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Sanctuary
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sigil of Sanctuary that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arknight Shard that play both.