Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red)
Runeblade Action
Reveal the top 3 cards of your deck. Create a Runechant token for each Runeblade attack action card revealed this way, then put the cards on top of your deck in any order.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.122.118062290
Average Defense Value:
2.592.586728828
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Viserai
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Viserai that play both.
Viserai, Rune Blood
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
Vynnset
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vynnset that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Chane that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Florian
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Florian that play both.
Equipment
Aether Ironweave
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Runehold Release
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runehold Release that play both.
Crown of Providence
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Ebon Fold
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Bloodied Oval
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Face Purgatory
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Carrion Husk
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Carrion Husk that play both.
Dance of Darkness
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Balance of Justice
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Mage Master Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ironrot Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Flail of Agony
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Flail of Agony that play both.
Scepter of Pain
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Reaping Blade
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Rotwood Reaper
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rotwood Reaper that play both.
Annals of Sutcliffe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Annals of Sutcliffe that play both.
Action
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.450980392
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.416363636
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.357142857
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.690000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.742038217
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.665584416
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.714285714
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Eloquent Eulogy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Eloquent Eulogy that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.502074689
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played:
2.262.263157895
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.652.649350649
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Runic Reaping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reaping (Red) that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.582.584415584
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.452.454545455
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.692.690721649
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodspill Invocation (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.392.388888889
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Yellow) that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.382.378571429
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
2.722.723214286
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.339805825
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.322.316176471
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Tome of the Arknight that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
2.532.533333333
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sigil of the Arknight that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Yellow) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.412371134
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Red) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lead the Charge (Yellow) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Seeds of Agony (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reaping (Blue) that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodspill Invocation (Blue) that play both.
Bequest the Vast Beyond
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bequest the Vast Beyond that play both.
Read the Runes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Read the Runes (Blue) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Condemn to Slaughter (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Germinate that play both.
Thistle Bloom - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Thistle Bloom - Life that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reaping (Yellow) that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow) that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Looming Doom that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Seeds of Agony (Yellow) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Tear Through the Portal (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.272727273
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.384105960
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.212.208333333
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.388059701
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
2.582.582644628
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.569105691
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
2.592.592920354
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
2.242.244186047
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
2.592.590476190
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.322.320441989
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hocus Pocus (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.682.681818182
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.470588235
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.320175439
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.584699454
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.322.322115385
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.652.653594771
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.461832061
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.355828221
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Strike (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.552.546448087
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Yellow) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.436046512
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.572.571428571
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Blue) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.536144578
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.425806452
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Strike (Blue) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.372.365079365
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Meat and Greet (Blue) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hocus Pocus (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Yellow) that play both.
Shadow of Ursur
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shadow of Ursur that play both.
Drowning Dire (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Drowning Dire (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Blue) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Yellow) that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.520325203
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Meat and Greet (Yellow) that play both.
Rift Skitter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rift Skitter (Red) that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Yellow) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Duet (Red) that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reek of Corruption (Red) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rip Through Reality (Red) that play both.
Rune Flash (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rune Flash (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Soul Reaping
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Soul Reaping that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Duet (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.786624204
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.526570048
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.452.448979592
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oblivion that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arknight Shard that play both.