Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow)
Runeblade Action
Reveal the top 2 cards of your deck. Create a Runechant token for each Runeblade attack action card revealed this way, then put the cards on top of your deck in any order.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.921.917894734
Average Defense Value:
2.592.592733879
Hero
Vynnset
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vynnset that play both.
Viserai, Rune Blood
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Viserai
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Viserai that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Chane that play both.
Equipment
Bloodied Oval
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Aether Ironweave
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mage Master Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Ebon Fold
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Glory Seeker
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Glory Seeker that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Shroud of Darkness
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Shroud of Darkness that play both.
Ironrot Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Dance of Darkness
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Blossom of Spring
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Ironhide Helm
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Blood Drop Brocade
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Blood Drop Brocade that play both.
Ironrot Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Flail of Agony
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Flail of Agony that play both.
Scepter of Pain
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Annals of Sutcliffe
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Annals of Sutcliffe that play both.
Reaping Blade
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Dread Scythe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Dread Scythe that play both.
Action
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.102.098901099
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.242.243589744
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.162.156250000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runic Reaping (Red) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bloodspill Invocation (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.142.137254902
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Putrid Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.811.812500000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.731.727272727
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runic Reaping (Yellow) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Putrid Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.461538462
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.272.269230769
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Read the Runes (Blue) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runic Reaping (Blue) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.691.692307692
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bloodspill Invocation (Blue) that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Red) that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Putrid Stirrings (Yellow) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
1.701.700000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Seeds of Agony (Red) that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Seeds of Agony (Yellow) that play both.
Bequest the Vast Beyond
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bequest the Vast Beyond that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.242.240000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.262.263157895
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Seeds of Agony (Blue) that play both.
Come to Fight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Come to Fight (Yellow) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Lead the Charge (Yellow) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Blue) that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Looming Doom that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.532.533333333
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Tome of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Tome of the Arknight that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Oath of the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.921.923076923
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Beseech the Demigon (Yellow) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Tear Through the Portal (Red) that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Yellow) that play both.
Runeblood Barrier
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runeblood Barrier that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Oath of the Arknight (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.203703704
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
1.961.962962963
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.314814815
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.042.041666667
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantom Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
2.212.214285714
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Meat and Greet (Yellow) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantom Wraith (Yellow) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantom Banshee (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantom Banshee (Yellow) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.292.285714286
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
2.262.258064516
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Shrill of Skullform (Yellow) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Spellblade Strike (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.222.222222222
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Meat and Greet (Blue) that play both.
Drowning Dire (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Drowning Dire (Red) that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Rift Skitter (Red)
Avg. played:
1.731.727272727
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rift Skitter (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arcanic Crackle (Blue) that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Red)
Avg. played:
2.262.260869565
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Reek of Corruption (Red) that play both.
Rune Flash (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.282.280000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rune Flash (Yellow) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Amplify the Arknight (Yellow) that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
2.732.727272727
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Spellblade Strike (Blue) that play both.
Drowning Dire (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Drowning Dire (Yellow) that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Rift Skitter (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rift Skitter (Blue) that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Reek of Corruption (Blue) that play both.
Rune Flash (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rune Flash (Blue) that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Spellblade Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Reek of Corruption (Yellow) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Rifted Torment (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rifted Torment (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Blue) that play both.
Singeing Steelblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Singeing Steelblade (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rip Through Reality (Red) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rip Through Reality (Yellow) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Consuming Volition (Blue) that play both.
Cryptic Crossing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Cryptic Crossing that play both.
Rift Bind (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rift Bind (Blue) that play both.
Piercing Shadow Vise (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Piercing Shadow Vise (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Spellblade Assault (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.052.052631579
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Oblivion that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arknight Shard that play both.