Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow)
Runeblade Action
Reveal the top 2 cards of your deck. Create a Runechant token for each Runeblade attack action card revealed this way, then put the cards on top of your deck in any order.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.951.949316260
Average Defense Value:
2.592.592782688
Hero
Viserai, Rune Blood
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Vynnset
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vynnset that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Viserai
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Viserai that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Chane that play both.
Florian
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Florian that play both.
Equipment
Crown of Dichotomy
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Aether Ironweave
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Face Purgatory
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Runehold Release
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runehold Release that play both.
Bloodied Oval
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Mage Master Boots
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Boots
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Ebon Fold
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironrot Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Arcane Lantern
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Dance of Darkness
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Shroud of Darkness
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Shroud of Darkness that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Blossom of Spring
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Ironrot Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Scepter of Pain
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Flail of Agony
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Flail of Agony that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Annals of Sutcliffe
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Annals of Sutcliffe that play both.
Reaping Blade
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Rotwood Reaper
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rotwood Reaper that play both.
Dread Scythe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Dread Scythe that play both.
Action
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.172.169642857
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.800000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.377777778
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.142.142857143
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.172.173913043
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bloodspill Invocation (Red) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.182.181818182
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runic Reaping (Red) that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.262.261904762
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Sigil of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sigil of the Arknight that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.200000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Deadwood Dirge (Yellow) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Condemn to Slaughter (Red) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runic Reaping (Yellow) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bloodspill Invocation (Blue) that play both.
Read the Runes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.292.290322581
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Read the Runes (Blue) that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Putrid Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Runic Reaping (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runic Reaping (Blue) that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Red) that play both.
Bequest the Vast Beyond
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bequest the Vast Beyond that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.282.280000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Seeds of Agony (Red) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Putrid Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Strong Yield (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Strong Yield (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arcane Cussing (Blue) that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arcane Cussing (Yellow) that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.122.121212121
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Putrid Stirrings (Yellow) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Seeds of Agony (Yellow) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Lead the Charge (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Tome of the Arknight that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.562.555555556
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Seeds of Agony (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Yellow) that play both.
Come to Fight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Come to Fight (Yellow) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Oath of the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Come to Fight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Come to Fight (Blue) that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Blue) that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Looming Doom that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.072.066666667
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Tear Through the Portal (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Oath of the Arknight (Yellow) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Blessing of Occult (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
2.222.220588235
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.342105263
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runerager Swarm (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.296296296
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
2.032.033333333
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Meat and Greet (Yellow) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.042.040000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantom Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.302.295454545
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantom Banshee (Blue) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Hocus Pocus (Red) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Hocus Pocus (Blue) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Hocus Pocus (Yellow) that play both.
Vantage Point (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantage Point (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Shrill of Skullform (Yellow) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Spellblade Strike (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.242.235294118
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantom Wraith (Yellow) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.242.235294118
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Meat and Greet (Blue) that play both.
Drowning Dire (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Drowning Dire (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Amplify the Arknight (Yellow) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.272727273
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantom Banshee (Yellow) that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Rune Flash (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.302.303030303
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rune Flash (Yellow) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Spellblade Strike (Blue) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arcanic Crackle (Blue) that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.291666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Reek of Corruption (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Rift Skitter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rift Skitter (Red) that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Rune Flash (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rune Flash (Blue) that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.444444444
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Spellblade Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Hit the High Notes (Yellow) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Runerager Swarm (Yellow) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Strength of Four Seasons (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Spike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arcanic Spike (Red) that play both.
Vantage Point (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Vantage Point (Yellow) that play both.
Arcanic Spike (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arcanic Spike (Yellow) that play both.
Drowning Dire (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Drowning Dire (Yellow) that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Reek of Corruption (Blue) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.112.111111111
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Singeing Steelblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Singeing Steelblade (Red) that play both.
Rift Skitter (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rift Skitter (Blue) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rip Through Reality (Red) that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Spellblade Assault (Yellow) that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Reek of Corruption (Yellow) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Rip Through Reality (Yellow) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Blue) that play both.
Drowning Dire (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Drowning Dire (Blue) that play both.
Aether Slash (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Aether Slash (Red) that play both.
Cryptic Crossing
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Cryptic Crossing that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.741935484
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.112.111111111
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Oblivion that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) and Arknight Shard that play both.