Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue)
Runeblade Action
Reveal the top card of your deck. Create a Runechant token for each Runeblade attack action card revealed this way.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.821.820896251
Average Defense Value:
2.582.575209452
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Viserai, Rune Blood
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Vynnset
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Vynnset that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Viserai
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Viserai that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Equipment
Crown of Dichotomy
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Aether Ironweave
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Runehold Release
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Runehold Release that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Face Purgatory
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Mage Master Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Ironrot Helm
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Aether Crackers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Aether Crackers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Ebon Fold
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Bloodied Oval
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Bruised Leather
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Bruised Leather that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Well Grounded
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Well Grounded that play both.
Ironrot Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Nebula Blade
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Nebula Blade that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Scepter of Pain
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Flail of Agony
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Flail of Agony that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Rosetta Thorn
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Reaping Blade
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Annals of Sutcliffe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Annals of Sutcliffe that play both.
Rotwood Reaper
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Rotwood Reaper that play both.
Dread Scythe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Dread Scythe that play both.
Action
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.212.209876543
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.357142857
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.212.210526316
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.272727273
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.172.170731707
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Bloodspill Invocation (Red) that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.102.100000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.182.178571429
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Runic Reaping (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.212.212121212
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.242.235294118
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Bloodspill Invocation (Blue) that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
2.292.285714286
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Runic Reaping (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.262.259259259
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Runic Reaping (Blue) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.459459459
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Read the Runes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.342.342857143
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Read the Runes (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Condemn to Slaughter (Red) that play both.
Sigil of the Arknight
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sigil of the Arknight that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Arcane Cussing (Blue) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Yellow) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
2.522.520000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.242.243243243
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Bequest the Vast Beyond
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Bequest the Vast Beyond that play both.
Tome of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Tome of the Arknight that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.262.260869565
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Runic Reaping (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.522.521739130
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Blue) that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.042.043478261
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Red) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Arcane Cussing (Yellow) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Blue) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Eloquent Eulogy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Eloquent Eulogy that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.262.263157895
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Oath of the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Sting of Sorcery
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sting of Sorcery that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.285714286
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Looming Doom that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.172.173913043
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Lead the Charge (Yellow) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Condemn to Slaughter (Blue) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Condemn to Slaughter (Yellow) that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Strong Yield (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Strong Yield (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Barrier
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Runeblood Barrier that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Seeds of Agony (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Blue) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Attack Action
Deny Redemption
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Deny Redemption that play both.
Douse in Runeblood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Douse in Runeblood that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
2.192.194029851
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.192.186666667
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
2.142.140625000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
2.242.239130435
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.132.132075472
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.172.166666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Spellblade Strike (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Runerager Swarm (Blue) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Hocus Pocus (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.428571429
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.342.342105263
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Meat and Greet (Blue) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Meat and Greet (Yellow) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Hocus Pocus (Blue) that play both.
Arcanic Spike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.172.166666667
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Arcanic Spike (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.172.166666667
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Vantage Point (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Vantage Point (Red) that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.242.240000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.092.088235294
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Amplify the Arknight (Yellow) that play both.
Rune Flash (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.322.321428571
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Rune Flash (Blue) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.242.240000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Spellblade Strike (Blue) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.296296296
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Arcanic Crackle (Blue) that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Runerager Swarm (Yellow) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Hit the High Notes (Yellow) that play both.
Splintering Deadwood (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Splintering Deadwood (Blue) that play both.
Arcanic Spike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Arcanic Spike (Blue) that play both.
Drowning Dire (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.315789474
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Drowning Dire (Red) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Rune Flash (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.362.363636364
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Rune Flash (Yellow) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Vantom Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Yellow) that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Reek of Corruption (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Vantom Wraith (Yellow) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.292.294117647
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Deathly Duet (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Deathly Duet (Blue) that play both.
Aether Slash (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Aether Slash (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Rift Skitter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Rift Skitter (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.532.533333333
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Blue) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Spellblade Assault (Yellow) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Vantom Banshee (Blue) that play both.
Singeing Steelblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Singeing Steelblade (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Deathly Duet (Red) that play both.
Snuff Out
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Snuff Out that play both.
Splintering Deadwood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Splintering Deadwood (Red) that play both.
Splintering Deadwood (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Splintering Deadwood (Yellow) that play both.
Arcanic Spike (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Arcanic Spike (Yellow) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Hocus Pocus (Yellow) that play both.
Vantage Point (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Vantage Point (Blue) that play both.
Vantage Point (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Vantage Point (Yellow) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Strength of Four Seasons (Red) that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Reek of Corruption (Blue) that play both.
Singeing Steelblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Singeing Steelblade (Red) that play both.
Piercing Shadow Vise (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Piercing Shadow Vise (Red) that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Cryptic Crossing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Cryptic Crossing that play both.
Aether Slash (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Aether Slash (Yellow) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Spellblade Assault (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Spellblade Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.419354839
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.082.076923077
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Blue) that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Oblivion that play both.
Fertile Ground (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Fertile Ground (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) and Arknight Shard that play both.