Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +2{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.341.344086728
Average Defense Value:
2.592.591938150
Hero
Kassai of the Golden Sand
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Olympia
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea that play both.
Kassai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai that play both.
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Gallantry Gold
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Vigor Girth
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Beckon Applause
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Ironsong Versus
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Prized Galea
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Prized Galea that play both.
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Crown of Dominion
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Parry Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Parry Blade that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Glory Seeker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glory Seeker that play both.
Warband of Bellona
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warband of Bellona that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Dawnblade
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hatchet of Body
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Action
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.339130435
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.352.345132743
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played:
2.212.211111111
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.375000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.102.104166667
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.472.467289720
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.262.260273973
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.232.230769231
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played:
2.712.714285714
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Spoils of War that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.354838710
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.265306122
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played:
2.402.396551724
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Raise an Army that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.313725490
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.372.365384615
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.711111111
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.612244898
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.462.456521739
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cash In that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
2.152.150943396
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.452.447368421
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Blood on Her Hands
Avg. played:
2.442.444444444
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blood on Her Hands that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.393939394
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:
2.462.457142857
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Push Forward (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Push Forward (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.533333333
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Double Down that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
2.092.090909091
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.248520710
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
2.682.683168317
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.452991453
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.462.459459459
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
2.382.383177570
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.495327103
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.342.337662338
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.274193548
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
2.592.585714286
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.359375000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played:
2.662.655172414
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Run Through that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.389830508
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.511627907
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.416666667
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Yellow) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut the Deck (Yellow) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played:
1.451.451612903
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rout that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut the Deck (Blue) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
1.521.518518519
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Up the Ante that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fatal Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.457627119
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.412.411764706
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.517241379
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.402.395833333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Take it on the Chin that play both.