banner
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
447 decks (0.09101%)
Price History
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +2{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.301.297911348
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.602.597715202
Hero
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Olympia
Olympia
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Kassai
Kassai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
Helm of Halo's Grace
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
Hood of Red Sand
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
Warpath of Winged Grace
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Beckon Applause
Beckon Applause
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Prized Galea that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Hard Knuckle
Hard Knuckle
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hard Knuckle that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Parry Blade
Parry Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Parry Blade that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Solar Plexus
Solar Plexus
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Solar Plexus that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
Hope Merchant's Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Glory Seeker
Glory Seeker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glory Seeker that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Unsheathed that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.270491803
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.276595745
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.209876543
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.769230769
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.265306122
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.226277372
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.390532544
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.326666667
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.335570470
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.222.223140496
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.302752294
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.289156627
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.662500000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Spoils of War that play both.
Truce
Truce
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Truce that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.621621622
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Raise an Army
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.394736842
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Raise an Army that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.375000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454545455
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cash In that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.601.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.438596491
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β 
2.052.051948052
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.490196078
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Push Forward (Red)
Push Forward (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Push Forward (Red) that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Starting Stake
Starting Stake
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Starting Stake that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Attack Action
Rising Speed (Red)
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.222.218954248
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.423645320
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.428571429
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.277777778
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.651612903
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.477528090
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.320610687
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.265486726
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.337748344
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Flurry that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.351851852
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.317647059
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Run Through
Run Through
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.662790698
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Run Through that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.406976744
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Up the Ante that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Yellow)
Stroke of Foresight (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Yellow) that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rout that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Yellow)
Cut the Deck (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut the Deck (Yellow) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Blue)
Stroke of Foresight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Blue) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Defense Reaction
Saving Grace
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833333333
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.458015267
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.405797101
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Evasive Leap (Red)
Evasive Leap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Evasive Leap (Red) that play both.
Instant
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.367924528
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.