Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +2{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.291.290602706
Average Defense Value:
2.602.602105378
Hero
Kassai of the Golden Sand
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia that play both.
Dorinthea
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Kassai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai that play both.
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Gallantry Gold
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Vigor Girth
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Beckon Applause
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Nullrune Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Ironsong Versus
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Prized Galea
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Prized Galea that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Crown of Providence
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Parry Blade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Parry Blade that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Glory Seeker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glory Seeker that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Bunker Beard
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Bunker Beard that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Dawnblade
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hatchet of Body
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Obsidian Fire Vein
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Action
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.282.282608696
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.269767442
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.195530726
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played:
2.562.562500000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Unsheathed that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.262.263473054
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.382.384210526
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.212.210884354
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.322.323529412
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.339285714
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.212.210526316
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.291666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played:
2.642.643678161
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Spoils of War that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.616279070
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played:
2.392.390804598
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Raise an Army that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trot Along that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played:
2.202.200000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Flurry Stance
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Flurry Stance that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.378378378
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.548780488
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.452.447761194
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cash In that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.442.442622951
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.542.535714286
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Yellow) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:
2.492.490909091
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Starting Stake
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Starting Stake that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Agility Stance
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agility Stance that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
Cut Deep (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut Deep (Blue) that play both.
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
Cut Deep (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut Deep (Yellow) that play both.
Point of Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Point of Engagement (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut from the Same Cloth (Yellow) that play both.
Knife through Butter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Knife through Butter (Red) that play both.
Knife through Butter (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Knife through Butter (Yellow) that play both.
Point of Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Point of Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dual Threat that play both.
Attack Action
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
For the Dracai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and For the Dracai that play both.
Tip-Off (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Tip-Off (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.212.207386364
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played:
2.882.875000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Provoke that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.418918919
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.432.425120773
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.272.267080745
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
2.662.662790698
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.455958549
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.320000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
2.202.200000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.262.256000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
2.352.349397590
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Flurry that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.330508475
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.302.298969072
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
2.572.570175439
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.385416667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played:
2.652.651685393
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Run Through that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.321428571
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Yellow) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Up the Ante that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Yellow) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Rout
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rout that play both.
Perforate
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Perforate that play both.
Diced (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Diced (Blue) that play both.
Diced (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Diced (Yellow) that play both.
Incision (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Incision (Red) that play both.
Incision (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Incision (Yellow) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
Take a Stab (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Take a Stab (Red) that play both.
Take a Stab (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Take a Stab (Yellow) that play both.
To the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and To the Point (Red) that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Diced (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Diced (Red) that play both.
Endear Devotion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Endear Devotion that play both.
Exposed
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Exposed that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Hunt's End
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hunt's End that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Searing Gaze
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Searing Gaze that play both.
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sizzling Steel that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stabbing Pain that play both.
Defense Reaction
Saving Grace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.443661972
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.372.373333333
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Den of the Spider
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Den of the Spider that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.372.367521368
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.