banner
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
540 decks (0.08203%)
Price History
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +2{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.251.253211386
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.622.616048025
Hero
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea that play both.
Olympia
Olympia
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Kassai
Kassai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
Hood of Red Sand
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Beckon Applause
Beckon Applause
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Prized Galea that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
Helm of Halo's Grace
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
Warpath of Winged Grace
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Parry Blade
Parry Blade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Parry Blade that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Old Knocker that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
Hope Merchant's Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Glory Seeker
Glory Seeker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glory Seeker that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.810810811
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Unsheathed that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.278523490
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.318181818
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trot Along that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.267281106
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.204301075
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.262.258823529
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.433962264
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.222.217105263
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.321839080
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.331395349
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.211678832
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.292682927
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.638297872
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Spoils of War that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.313953488
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.617977528
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Raise an Army
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.388888889
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Raise an Army that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.559523810
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.381578947
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.447761194
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cash In that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β 
2.162.156250000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.435483871
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.476923077
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Yellow) that play both.
Starting Stake
Starting Stake
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Starting Stake that play both.
Attack Action
Trade In (Red)
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Attack Reaction
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.906250000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Provoke that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.200000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.269230769
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.704081633
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.420353982
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.429245283
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.265432099
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.309941520
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.418848168
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454081633
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.251968504
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.300000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.572649573
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.318181818
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Run Through
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.648351648
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Run Through that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Yellow) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rout that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Up the Ante that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Yellow)
Stroke of Foresight (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Yellow)
Cut the Deck (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut the Deck (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.473333333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Saving Grace
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.389610390
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.316176471
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.516666667
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.