Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +2{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.221.218632294
Average Defense Value:
2.632.632997839
Hero
Kassai of the Golden Sand
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia that play both.
Dorinthea
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Kassai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Gallantry Gold
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Vigor Girth
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Beckon Applause
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Ironsong Versus
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Crown of Providence
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Prized Galea
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Prized Galea that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Crown of Dominion
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Parry Blade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Parry Blade that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Old Knocker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Old Knocker that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Dawnblade
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hatchet of Body
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Avg. played:
2.862.862068966
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Unsheathed that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.272.268518519
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played:
2.302.304347826
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trot Along that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.265765766
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played:
2.212.211340206
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.252.252873563
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.212.211538462
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.492.489539749
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.332.327683616
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.337142857
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.212.205673759
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.289062500
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played:
2.632.628865979
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Spoils of War that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.347826087
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.626373626
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played:
2.402.395604396
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Raise an Army that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.558139535
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.384615385
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:
2.482.479452055
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.452.447761194
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cash In that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.452.446153846
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Provoke
Avg. played:
2.882.877192982
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Provoke that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played:
2.172.166666667
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
2.162.155555556
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.202702703
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
2.732.732142857
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.299492386
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.422413793
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
2.472.474418605
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.432.433179724
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.272.273809524
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.455000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.248120301
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.338709677
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.312.307692308
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
2.582.575000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played:
2.682.684782609
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.322222222
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played:
2.162.156716418
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Run Through that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.405940594
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Yellow) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rout that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Up the Ante that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.490566038
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.392.392405063
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.272.272151899
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.597402597
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.