banner
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
502 decks (0.08122%)
Price History
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +2{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.291.288142671
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.602.601288216
Hero
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia
Olympia
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia that play both.
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Kassai
Kassai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai that play both.
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
Hood of Red Sand
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Beckon Applause
Beckon Applause
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
Helm of Halo's Grace
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
Warpath of Winged Grace
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Prized Galea that play both.
Bunker Beard
Bunker Beard
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Bunker Beard that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Parry Blade
Parry Blade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Parry Blade that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
Hope Merchant's Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Glory Seeker
Glory Seeker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glory Seeker that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Action
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.282608696
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.271028037
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.196629213
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.533333333
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Unsheathed that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.262.263473054
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.380952381
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.212328767
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.323529412
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.335329341
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.204545455
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.294117647
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Flurry Stance
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Flurry Stance that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.639534884
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Spoils of War that play both.
Raise an Army
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.397727273
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Raise an Army that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.611764706
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.378378378
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554216867
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.447761194
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cash In that play both.
Agility Stance
Agility Stance
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agility Stance that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trot Along that play both.
Cut Deep (Blue)
Cut Deep (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut Deep (Blue) that play both.
Cut Deep (Red)
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
Cut Deep (Yellow)
Cut Deep (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut Deep (Yellow) that play both.
Point of Engagement (Red)
Point of Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Point of Engagement (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dual Threat that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.442622951
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.535714286
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Yellow) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.481481481
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Starting Stake
Starting Stake
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Starting Stake that play both.
Attack Action
Trade In (Red)
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.212643678
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Provoke that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.418918919
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.425120773
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.268750000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.658823529
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.458762887
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.319727891
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.262.258064516
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.341463415
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Flurry that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.294736842
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.562500000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.391752577
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Run Through
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.651685393
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Run Through that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.313253012
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Yellow) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Perforate that play both.
Diced (Blue)
Diced (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Diced (Blue) that play both.
Diced (Yellow)
Diced (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Diced (Yellow) that play both.
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Incision (Red) that play both.
Incision (Yellow)
Incision (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Incision (Yellow) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
Take a Stab (Red)
Take a Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Take a Stab (Red) that play both.
Take a Stab (Yellow)
Take a Stab (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Take a Stab (Yellow) that play both.
To the Point (Red)
To the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and To the Point (Red) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Up the Ante that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Yellow)
Stroke of Foresight (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Yellow) that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rout that play both.
Defense Reaction
Saving Grace
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.443661972
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.381578947
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Instant
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.367521368
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.