banner
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
584 decks (0.08391%)
Price History
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +2{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.211.212224487
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.642.638669049
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Olympia
Olympia
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia that play both.
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dorinthea that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Kassai
Kassai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kassai that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
Hood of Red Sand
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Beckon Applause
Beckon Applause
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Prized Galea that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
Helm of Halo's Grace
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Parry Blade
Parry Blade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Parry Blade that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
Warpath of Winged Grace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.867647059
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Unsheathed that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.283018868
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trot Along that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.266666667
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.269058296
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.222.215384615
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.254335260
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506024096
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.210191083
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.325842697
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.335227273
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.289062500
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.632653061
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Spoils of War that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.347826087
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.619565217
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Raise an Army
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.395604396
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Raise an Army that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.558139535
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.384615385
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.447761194
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cash In that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Lead with Heart (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.875000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Provoke that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.162.163636364
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.152.153846154
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.207547170
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.742489270
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.303921569
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.712820513
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.420600858
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.433179724
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.272189349
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.455000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.248120301
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.344000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.307692308
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.581967213
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.696969697
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Run Through
Avg. played: Β 
2.122.121428571
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Run Through that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.405940594
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Ironsong Response (Yellow) that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Rout that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Up the Ante that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Yellow)
Stroke of Foresight (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Stroke of Foresight (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.490683230
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Saving Grace
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.266666667
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.626506024
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.