Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +1{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create a Vigor token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.411.406334360
Average Defense Value:
2.512.510154487
Hero
Olympia, Prized Fighter
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Kassai
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Kassai that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Dorinthea
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Dorinthea that play both.
Olympia
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Olympia that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Prized Galea
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Prized Galea that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Gallantry Gold
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Vigor Girth
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Beckon Applause
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Old Knocker
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Old Knocker that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironsong Versus
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Parry Blade
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Parry Blade that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Red Alert Boots
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Red Alert Boots that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blossom of Spring
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Deep Blue
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Starting Point
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Starting Point that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Weapon
Cintari Saber
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hot Streak
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Hot Streak that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Dawnblade
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hatchet of Body
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Merciless Battleaxe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Merciless Battleaxe that play both.
Action
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.302.304029304
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played:
2.642.644444444
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.431297710
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played:
2.222.217391304
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.212.213836478
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.472.469827586
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.192.190789474
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.202.195488722
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.337837838
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.443708609
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played:
2.672.672000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Double Down that play both.
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.352.354330709
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Heart (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.402.404411765
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.463087248
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Unsheathed that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.472.474452555
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.662.660194175
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.353535354
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
2.252.246268657
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.344827586
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.412.406593407
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.423913043
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.433333333
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played:
2.612.608108108
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Cleave that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played:
2.582.578947368
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Spill Blood that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.439393939
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Sharpen Steel (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Heart (Yellow) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Attack Action
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.245454545
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.429752066
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.409090909
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.342.337662338
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Wage Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Wage Agility (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Attack Reaction
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.297945205
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.287037037
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.282.279411765
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
2.642.640211640
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Up the Ante that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played:
2.262.263157895
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Provoke that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.365671642
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.557823129
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played:
2.262.256880734
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
2.712.714285714
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.636363636
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Vigorous Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.388888889
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
2.572.571428571
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.625000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.482.484210526
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.432.432835821
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Cut the Deck (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.412.412698413
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Stroke of Foresight (Blue) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.541353383
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.512.506329114
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Put in Context
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Put in Context that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Block
On the Horizon (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and On the Horizon (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.375000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played:
2.532.529411765
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Slap-Happy that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Resource
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Blue) and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.