Emerging Dominance (Red)
Guardian Action - Aura
(Auras stay in the arena until they are destroyed.)
At the beginning of your action phase, destroy Emerging Dominance then the next Guardian attack action card you play this turn gains +3 [Power] and dominate.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.164.163195537
Average Defense Value: Β
2.822.818516801
Hero
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Terra
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Terra that play both.
Bravo
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Betsy
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Betsy that play both.
Lyath Goldmane
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Lyath Goldmane that play both.
Pleiades, Superstar
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Pleiades, Superstar that play both.
Equipment
Attention Grabbers
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Attention Grabbers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Civic Steps
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Tectonic Plating
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Craterhoof
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crater Fist
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Hood
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Arcane Lantern
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Ironrot Legs
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Mage Master Boots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Virtuoso Bodice
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Virtuoso Bodice that play both.
Bastion of Duty
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Aurum Aegis
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Stand Ground
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Stand Ground that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Ironhide Legs
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Golden Glare
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Golden Glare that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Mightybone Knuckles
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Mightybone Knuckles that play both.
Horns of the Despised
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Horns of the Despised that play both.
Ironfist Revelation
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Ironfist Revelation that play both.
Toby Jugs
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Toby Jugs that play both.
Vigor Girth
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Gauntlet of Boulderhold
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Gauntlet of Boulderhold that play both.
Deep Blue
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Civic Guide
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Civic Guide that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Redwood Hammer
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Cruel Ambition that play both.
Two Steps Ahead
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Two Steps Ahead that play both.
Booze!
Avg. played: Β
2.772.769230769
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Booze! that play both.
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.692307692
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
Sadistic Scowl
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Sadistic Scowl that play both.
Revolting Gesture
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727272727
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Revolting Gesture that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.652.648780488
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.439024390
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Earthlore Empowerment (Red) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.702.703703704
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Emerging Dominance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.390625000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Emerging Dominance (Blue) that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.622.618644068
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Crash Down (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.476190476
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Crash Down (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.622.617283951
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Seeds of Strength (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Seeds of Strength (Blue) that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.586206897
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Midas Touch that play both.
Cheap Shot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Cheap Shot that play both.
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Seeds of Strength (Yellow) that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.367346939
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.367346939
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
2.382.382978723
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Leave a Dent that play both.
Stonewall Confidence (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Stonewall Confidence (Blue) that play both.
Seismic Stir (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Seismic Stir (Red) that play both.
Prime the Crowd (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Prime the Crowd (Red) that play both.
Villainous Pose (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Villainous Pose (Blue) that play both.
Emerging Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Emerging Power (Red) that play both.
Towering Titan (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.533333333
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Towering Titan (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Embolden (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Embolden (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Red) that play both.
Stamp Authority
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Stamp Authority that play both.
Draw a Crowd
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Draw a Crowd that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Embolden (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.490566038
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Embolden (Red) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Sloggism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Sloggism (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Truce that play both.
Attack Action
Short Shrift
Avg. played: Β
2.902.900000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Short Shrift that play both.
Escalate Violence
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Escalate Violence that play both.
Spew Obscenities
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Spew Obscenities that play both.
Cut a Long Story Short
Avg. played: Β
2.802.800000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Cut a Long Story Short that play both.
Power Play (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.800000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Power Play (Blue) that play both.
No Tall Tales
Avg. played: Β
2.772.769230769
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and No Tall Tales that play both.
Wee Wrecking Ball
Avg. played: Β
2.472.466666667
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Wee Wrecking Ball that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.468619247
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.440366972
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.618784530
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.415384615
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.192.185185185
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.336538462
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.592.588888889
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.343949045
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Battered, Beaten, and Broken that play both.
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Bully Tactics that play both.
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.349514563
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.296551724
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.602.604790419
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.262.256198347
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.559006211
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Overturn the Results
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Overturn the Results that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.427586207
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.252.252252252
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.262.258928571
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Crush Confidence (Blue) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.274336283
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.602.603305785
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.275510204
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Overcrowded that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.342857143
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.377049180
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.433333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Cut Off at the Knees
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Cut Off at the Knees that play both.
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.592.593220339
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.545454545
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.821.815533981
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Small Problem
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Small Problem that play both.
Fix the Match
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Fix the Match that play both.
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Full of Bravado (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Colossal Bearing
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Colossal Bearing that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.473684211
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Grind Them Down (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Grind Them Down (Red) that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Mangle that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.312.313725490
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.340909091
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.473333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.272727273
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.425000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.422.415384615
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.777777778
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Truth or Trickery
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Truth or Trickery that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.552.551724138
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Test of Vigor
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Test of Vigor that play both.
Test of Might
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Test of Might that play both.
Instant
Leave Them Hanging
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Leave Them Hanging that play both.
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555555556
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Edge of Their Seats (Red) that play both.
Tension in the Air (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.769230769
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Tension in the Air (Red) that play both.
Concealed Object
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555555556
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Concealed Object that play both.
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Edge of Their Seats (Blue) that play both.
Arrogant Showboating
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Arrogant Showboating that play both.
Liar's Charm
Avg. played: Β
1.891.888888889
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Liar's Charm that play both.
Act of Glory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Act of Glory (Blue) that play both.
Act of Glory (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.428571429
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Act of Glory (Red) that play both.
In the Palm of Your Hand
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and In the Palm of Your Hand that play both.
What Happens Next?
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and What Happens Next? that play both.
The Suspense is Killing Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and The Suspense is Killing Me that play both.
Up on a Pedestal
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Up on a Pedestal that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Resource
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Emerging Dominance (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.