Even Bigger Than That! (Blue)
Generic Instant
Play Even Bigger Than That! only if you've dealt [Power] this turn.
Opt 1, then reveal the top card of your deck. If it has [Power] greater than the amount of damage you've dealt this turn, create a Quicken token and draw a card.Β (Look at the top card of your deck. You may put them on the bottom.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.373.365733069
Average Defense Value: Β
2.552.549435043
Hero
Arakni, Huntsman
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
New
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Fai, Rising Rebellion
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
Aurora, Shooting Star
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Mask of Momentum
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Arcane Lantern
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Tide Flippers
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Mask of Perdition
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Breaking Scales
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Nullrune Robe
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Flick Knives
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Nullrune Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Lightning Greaves
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Traverse the Universe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Civic Steps
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Civic Steps that play both.
Pouncing Paws
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Crater Fist
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Crater Fist that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Tectonic Plating
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Dominion
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Ornate Tessen
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Ornate Tessen that play both.
Aurum Aegis
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Weapon
Harmonized Kodachi
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Spider's Bite
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Star Fall
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Star Fall that play both.
Orbitoclast
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Zephyr Needle
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Tiger Taming Khakkara
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Scale Peeler
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Action
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.722.720000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742857143
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Pay Day
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Pay Day that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Call to the Grave that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Truce that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Attack Action
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.852.851973684
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.802.803508772
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807086614
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Eradicate that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Rob the Rich (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Rob the Rich (Red) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Take the Tempo
Avg. played: Β
2.722.723076923
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Take the Tempo that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Stab Wound that play both.
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Fleece the Frail (Red) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Censor that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Regicide
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Regicide that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Torrent of Tempo (Red) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Dishonor that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Nasty Surprise that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Chase the Tail that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Lord of Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Lord of Wind that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Annihilate the Armed (Blue) that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Double Strike that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β
2.622.615384615
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Smash Up that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Current Funnel that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Find Center
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Find Center that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Mauling Qi that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Nix the Nimble (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Plunder the Poor (Blue) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Lava Burst that play both.
Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Soulbead Strike (Red) that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Lightning Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Lightning Form (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Slay the Scholars (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Soaring Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Soaring Strike (Red) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.492.493506494
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Surging Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Annihilate the Armed (Yellow) that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Droplet
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Droplet that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Rushing River (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Rushing River (Blue) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700374532
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Cut to the Chase (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.797101449
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Even Bigger Than That! (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.778761062
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Even Bigger Than That! (Red) that play both.
Even Bigger Than That! (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.728033473
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Even Bigger Than That! (Yellow) that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.722.721893491
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Art of War that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Blue) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.