Face Adversity
Generic Equipment - Head
This may only defend an attack if the attack's controller has drawn a card this turn.
Blade Break (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.433.430460957
Average Defense Value:
2.362.357235731
Hero
Kayo
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Kayo that play both.
Briar
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Briar that play both.
Olympia
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Olympia that play both.
Betsy
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Betsy that play both.
Rhinar
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Rhinar that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlet of Might
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Flat Trackers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Flat Trackers that play both.
Embrace Adversity
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Embrace Adversity that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Confront Adversity
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Confront Adversity that play both.
Vigor Girth
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Vigor Girth that play both.
Headliner Helm
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Headliner Helm that play both.
Raw Meat
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Raw Meat that play both.
Bloodied Oval
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Grandstand Legplates
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Grandstand Legplates that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Glory Seeker
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Glory Seeker that play both.
Ironrot Helm
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Overcome Adversity
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Overcome Adversity that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Ironrot Legs
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Aether Ironweave
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Stadium Centerpiece
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Stadium Centerpiece that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Gallantry Gold
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Blossom of Spring
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Sheltered Cove
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sheltered Cove that play both.
Refraction Bolters
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mandible Claw that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Ball Breaker
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ball Breaker that play both.
High Riser
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and High Riser that play both.
Cintari Saber
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Cintari Saber that play both.
Action
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
1.421.416666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played:
1.541.538461538
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played:
1.421.416666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.551.545454545
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Power (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Lead with Power (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Lead with Power (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Lead with Power (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Rally the Rearguard (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
1.601.600000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played:
1.641.642857143
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played:
1.641.642857143
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Red)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mighty Windup (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
1.621.615384615
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.621.615384615
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.471.466666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.581.583333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wage Agility (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Agility (Yellow) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.641.636363636
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Might (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.421.416666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Might (Yellow) that play both.
Pound Town (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pound Town (Yellow) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.551.545454545
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.401.400000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Agility (Blue) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played:
1.551.545454545
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
1.451.454545455
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.441.444444444
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pack Hunt (Yellow) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played:
1.561.555555556
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.561.555555556
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Rising Power (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Rising Power (Red) that play both.
Down But Not Out (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Down But Not Out (Red) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Rally the Rearguard (Yellow) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Clash of Agility (Yellow) that play both.
T-Bone (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and T-Bone (Blue) that play both.
T-Bone (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and T-Bone (Red) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Zero to Sixty (Blue) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Zero to Sixty (Red) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Arcanic Shockwave (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Vigor (Yellow) that play both.
Pack Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pack Call (Blue) that play both.
Pack Call (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pack Call (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bare Fangs (Blue) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Gold (Yellow) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pack Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wild Ride (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Lunging Press
Avg. played:
1.441.444444444
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Lunging Press that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.282.277777778
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.292.285714286
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.