banner
Face Adversity
145 decks (0.02443%)
Price History
Face Adversity
Generic Equipment - Head
This may only defend an attack if the attack's controller has drawn a card this turn. Blade Break (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.053.052471303
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.452.452844281
Hero
Aurora, Shooting Star
Aurora, Shooting Star
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
New
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Kayo
Kayo
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Kayo that play both.
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Dorinthea that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Oscilio
Oscilio
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Oscilio that play both.
Aurora
Aurora
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Aurora that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Nuu
Nuu
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nuu that play both.
Olympia
Olympia
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Olympia that play both.
Equipment
New
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Flat Trackers that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
Gauntlet of Might
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Vigor Girth that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
New
Red Alert Visor
Red Alert Visor
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Red Alert Visor that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Embrace Adversity
Embrace Adversity
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Embrace Adversity that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Bruised Leather
Bruised Leather
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bruised Leather that play both.
Hood of Second Thoughts
Hood of Second Thoughts
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hood of Second Thoughts that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
Stonewall Gauntlet
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Flight Path
Flight Path
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Flight Path that play both.
Sharp Shooters
Sharp Shooters
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sharp Shooters that play both.
Raw Meat
Raw Meat
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Raw Meat that play both.
Headliner Helm
Headliner Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Headliner Helm that play both.
Overcome Adversity
Overcome Adversity
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Overcome Adversity that play both.
Confront Adversity
Confront Adversity
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Confront Adversity that play both.
Bloodied Oval
Bloodied Oval
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
Achilles Accelerator
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Grandstand Legplates
Grandstand Legplates
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Grandstand Legplates that play both.
Ironrot Helm
Ironrot Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Glory Seeker
Glory Seeker
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Glory Seeker that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Beckon Applause
Beckon Applause
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Beckon Applause that play both.
Runehold Release
Runehold Release
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Runehold Release that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
Flash of Brilliance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Hold Focus
Hold Focus
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hold Focus that play both.
Ink-lined Cloak
Ink-lined Cloak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ink-lined Cloak that play both.
Twinkle Toes
Twinkle Toes
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Twinkle Toes that play both.
Four Finger Gloves
Four Finger Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Four Finger Gloves that play both.
Aether Crackers
Aether Crackers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Aether Crackers that play both.
Lightning Greaves
Lightning Greaves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Deep Blue
Deep Blue
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Deep Blue that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Skyhold Keikoi
Skyhold Keikoi
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Skyhold Keikoi that play both.
Hidden Agenda
Hidden Agenda
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hidden Agenda that play both.
Target Totalizer
Target Totalizer
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Target Totalizer that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Aether Ironweave
Aether Ironweave
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Stadium Centerpiece
Stadium Centerpiece
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Stadium Centerpiece that play both.
Weapon
Star Fall
Star Fall
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Star Fall that play both.
New
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mandible Claw that play both.
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Dawnblade that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Cintari Saber that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hot Streak that play both.
Action
Arc Lightning
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Arc Lightning that play both.
New
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hunt a Killer (Blue) that play both.
New
Power Stance
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Power Stance that play both.
New
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Sizzle (Red)
Sizzle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sizzle (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Line It Up
Line It Up
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Line It Up that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.440000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue)
Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue) that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Yellow)
Etchings of Arcana (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Etchings of Arcana (Yellow) that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
Perennial Aetherbloom (Blue)
Perennial Aetherbloom (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Perennial Aetherbloom (Blue) that play both.
Perennial Aetherbloom (Yellow)
Perennial Aetherbloom (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Perennial Aetherbloom (Yellow) that play both.
Pop the Bubble (Yellow)
Pop the Bubble (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pop the Bubble (Yellow) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Red)
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Sizzle (Yellow)
Sizzle (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sizzle (Yellow) that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Driving Blade (Blue)
Driving Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Driving Blade (Blue) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
New
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and For the Dracai that play both.
New
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
New
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
New
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and March of Loyalty that play both.
New
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
New
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
New
Sound the Alarm
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Fry (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Stone Rain
Stone Rain
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Stone Rain that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mind's Desire (Blue) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Red)
Rally the Rearguard (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Rally the Rearguard (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Yellow)
Pack Hunt (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pack Hunt (Yellow) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Smash Up
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Smash Up that play both.
Flittering Charge (Blue)
Flittering Charge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Flittering Charge (Blue) that play both.
Flittering Charge (Yellow)
Flittering Charge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Flittering Charge (Yellow) that play both.
Second Strike (Yellow)
Second Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Second Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Trip the Light Fantastic (Red)
Trip the Light Fantastic (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Trip the Light Fantastic (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Current Funnel
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Current Funnel that play both.
Trip the Light Fantastic (Blue)
Trip the Light Fantastic (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Trip the Light Fantastic (Blue) that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Tongue Tied
Tongue Tied
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Tongue Tied that play both.
Wage Agility (Yellow)
Wage Agility (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Agility (Yellow) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Red)
Mighty Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mighty Windup (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.531.529411765
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Pound Town (Yellow)
Pound Town (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pound Town (Yellow) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Yellow)
Desires of Flesh (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Desires of Flesh (Yellow) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Impulsive Desire (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Blue)
Impulsive Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Impulsive Desire (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Blue)
Wage Agility (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Agility (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
New
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blistering Blade that play both.
New
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Endear Devotion that play both.
New
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
New
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hunt's End that play both.
New
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Jagged Edge that play both.
New
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
New
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Searing Gaze that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.409090909
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Intimate Inducement (Blue) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Red)
Intimate Inducement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Intimate Inducement (Red) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Yellow)
Intimate Inducement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Intimate Inducement (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Den of the Spider that play both.
New
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Smoke Out that play both.
New
Put in Context
Put in Context
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Put in Context that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.357142857
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Test of Strength that play both.
Test of Might
Test of Might
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Test of Might that play both.
Instant
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.750000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
New
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pledge Fealty that play both.
New
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Blue)
Electrostatic Discharge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Electrostatic Discharge (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Sigil of Forethought
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Yellow)
Electrostatic Discharge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Electrostatic Discharge (Yellow) that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pass Over that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Stir the Pot that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Take it on the Chin that play both.