Face Adversity
Generic Equipment - Head
This may only defend an attack if the attack's controller has drawn a card this turn.
Blade Break (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.083.077856010
Average Defense Value:
2.462.458673853
Hero
Scurv, Stowaway
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Aurora, Shooting Star
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Kayo
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Kayo that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Dorinthea
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Dorinthea that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Olympia that play both.
Equipment
Light Fingers
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Light Fingers that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Flat Trackers
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Flat Trackers that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Vigor Girth
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Vigor Girth that play both.
Nullrune Hood
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Embrace Adversity
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Embrace Adversity that play both.
Refraction Bolters
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gallantry Gold
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Raw Meat
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Raw Meat that play both.
Headliner Helm
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Headliner Helm that play both.
Overcome Adversity
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Overcome Adversity that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Confront Adversity
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Confront Adversity that play both.
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Red Alert Visor
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Red Alert Visor that play both.
Hood of Second Thoughts
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hood of Second Thoughts that play both.
Bloodied Oval
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Grandstand Legplates
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Grandstand Legplates that play both.
Flight Path
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Flight Path that play both.
Sharp Shooters
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sharp Shooters that play both.
Glory Seeker
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Glory Seeker that play both.
Ironrot Helm
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Beckon Applause
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Beckon Applause that play both.
Starlight Striders
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Starlight Striders that play both.
Zap Clappers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Zap Clappers that play both.
Aether Ironweave
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Deep Blue
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Deep Blue that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Ironrot Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ironrot Legs that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Stadium Centerpiece
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Stadium Centerpiece that play both.
Sheltered Cove
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sheltered Cove that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Skyhold Keikoi
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Skyhold Keikoi that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Star Fall
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Star Fall that play both.
Mandible Claw
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mandible Claw that play both.
Dawnblade
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Dawnblade that play both.
Obsidian Fire Vein
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Cintari Saber
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Cintari Saber that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Action
Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign that play both.
Regain Composure
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Regain Composure that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Shifting Tides that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Tit for Tat
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Tit for Tat that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Arc Lightning that play both.
Sizzle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sizzle (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hunt a Killer (Blue) that play both.
Power Stance
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Power Stance that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Trot Along that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.458333333
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Line It Up
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Line It Up that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
1.551.550000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Skyward Serenade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Skyward Serenade that play both.
Written in the Stars
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Written in the Stars that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Driving Blade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Driving Blade (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Gold Hunter Marauder
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Gold Hunter Marauder that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Money or Your Life? (Red) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Money or Your Life? (Yellow) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Art of the Dragon: Fire that play both.
Display Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Display Loyalty that play both.
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Blue) that play both.
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red) that play both.
Hot on Their Heels
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hot on Their Heels that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Fry (Red) that play both.
For the Dracai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and For the Dracai that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
March of Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and March of Loyalty that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Rally the Rearguard (Red) that play both.
Stone Rain
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Stone Rain that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mind's Desire (Blue) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Skyzyk
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Skyzyk that play both.
Pack Hunt (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pack Hunt (Yellow) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Agility (Yellow) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mighty Windup (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.531.529411765
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Pound Town (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pound Town (Yellow) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Wage Agility (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Desires of Flesh (Yellow) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Impulsive Desire (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Impulsive Desire (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Provoke
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Provoke that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Blistering Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Blistering Blade that play both.
Endear Devotion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Endear Devotion that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Hunt's End
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hunt's End that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Jagged Edge that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Searing Gaze
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Searing Gaze that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.428571429
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Intimate Inducement (Blue) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Intimate Inducement (Red) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Intimate Inducement (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.377358491
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.392.392857143
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Den of the Spider
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Den of the Spider that play both.
Smoke Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Smoke Out that play both.
Put in Context
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Put in Context that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Instant
Not So Fast
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Not So Fast that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.571428571
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
banned - Blitz
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Pass Over that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and Stir the Pot that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Face Adversity and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.