Confront Adversity
Generic Equipment - Chest
This may only defend an attack if the attack's controller has destroyed a Vigor token this turn.
Blade Break (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.083.080120263
Average Defense Value:
2.432.428221001
Hero
Aurora, Shooting Star
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Betsy
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Betsy that play both.
Olympia
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Olympia that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Kayo
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Kayo that play both.
Victor Goldmane
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Four Finger Gloves
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Four Finger Gloves that play both.
Embrace Adversity
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Embrace Adversity that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Flat Trackers
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Flat Trackers that play both.
Overcome Adversity
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Overcome Adversity that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Face Adversity
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Face Adversity that play both.
Bruised Leather
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Bruised Leather that play both.
Hood of Second Thoughts
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Hood of Second Thoughts that play both.
Vigor Girth
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Vigor Girth that play both.
Stand Ground
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Stand Ground that play both.
Glory Seeker
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Glory Seeker that play both.
Headliner Helm
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Headliner Helm that play both.
Stadium Centerpiece
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Stadium Centerpiece that play both.
Prized Galea
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Prized Galea that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Grandstand Legplates
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Grandstand Legplates that play both.
Bloodied Oval
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Crown of Dominion
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Sheltered Cove
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Sheltered Cove that play both.
Ticket Puncher
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Ticket Puncher that play both.
Beckon Applause
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Beckon Applause that play both.
Quickstep
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Quickstep that play both.
Golden Glare
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Golden Glare that play both.
Knucklehead
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Knucklehead that play both.
Parry Blade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Parry Blade that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Raw Meat
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Raw Meat that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Refraction Bolters
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Weapon
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Jinglewood, Smash Hit that play both.
High Riser
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and High Riser that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Hot Streak
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Hot Streak that play both.
Mandible Claw
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Mandible Claw that play both.
Titan's Fist
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Titan's Fist that play both.
Cintari Saber
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Cintari Saber that play both.
Action
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
1.761.760000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Arc Lightning that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Emissary of Tides
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Emissary of Tides that play both.
Starting Stake
Avg. played:
1.891.888888889
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Starting Stake that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
1.641.636363636
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and This Round's on Me that play both.
Song of the Rosen Matador
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Song of the Rosen Matador that play both.
Song of the Shining Knight
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Song of the Shining Knight that play both.
Encore
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Encore that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Energy Potion that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Big Bop (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Big Bop (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played:
1.441.444444444
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Double Down that play both.
Song of Yesteryears
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Song of Yesteryears that play both.
Song of Sweet Nectar
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Song of Sweet Nectar that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Cash Out
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Cash Out that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Attack Action
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Smash Up that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
1.951.950000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played:
1.711.714285714
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played:
1.631.625000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Final Act
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Final Act that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Over the Top (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Over the Top (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Mighty Windup (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.601.600000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Wage Agility (Yellow) that play both.
Vigorous Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Vigorous Windup (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Rally the Rearguard (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Down But Not Out (Red)
Avg. played:
1.451.454545455
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Down But Not Out (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Thunk (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Wage Agility (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played:
1.441.444444444
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
1.561.555555556
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Red)
Avg. played:
1.441.444444444
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Rally the Rearguard (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Adrenaline Rush (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Adrenaline Rush (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Ripple Away that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Pay Up
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Pay Up that play both.
Down But Not Out (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Down But Not Out (Blue) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Rawhide Rumble (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Rawhide Rumble (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Wage Might (Yellow) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Rising Power (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Rising Power (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Bet Big that play both.
Attack Reaction
Lunging Press
Avg. played:
1.451.454545455
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Lunging Press that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Take the Upper Hand (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Up the Ante that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Evasive Leap (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Evasive Leap (Blue) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
2.052.052631579
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Test of Strength that play both.
Test of Might
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Test of Might that play both.
Test of Agility
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Test of Agility that play both.
Crowd Control (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Crowd Control (Red) that play both.
Instant
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Sigil of Shelter
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Sigil of Shelter that play both.
Sigil of Shelter (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Sigil of Shelter (Yellow) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Confront Adversity and Take it on the Chin that play both.