Embrace Adversity
Generic Equipment - Arms
This may only defend an attack if the attack's controller has destroyed a Might token this turn.
Blade Break (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.992.986582414
Average Defense Value: Β
2.422.418313858
Hero
Jarl VetreiΔi
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Kayo
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Kayo that play both.
Betsy
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Betsy that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Aurora, Shooting Star
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire that play both.
Olympia
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Olympia that play both.
Equipment
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Well Grounded
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Well Grounded that play both.
Confront Adversity
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Confront Adversity that play both.
Overcome Adversity
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Overcome Adversity that play both.
Face Adversity
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Face Adversity that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Flat Trackers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Flat Trackers that play both.
Bruised Leather
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Bruised Leather that play both.
Vigor Girth
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Vigor Girth that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Crown of Providence
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Crown of Providence that play both.
Headliner Helm
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Headliner Helm that play both.
Bloodied Oval
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Crown of Dominion
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Glory Seeker
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Glory Seeker that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Grandstand Legplates
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Grandstand Legplates that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Teklo Foundry Heart
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Teklo Foundry Heart that play both.
Balance of Justice
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Knucklehead
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Knucklehead that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Nullrune Hood
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Face Purgatory
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Face Purgatory that play both.
Four Finger Gloves
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Four Finger Gloves that play both.
Hood of Second Thoughts
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Hood of Second Thoughts that play both.
Calming Cloak
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Calming Cloak that play both.
Hold Focus
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Hold Focus that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Raw Meat
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Raw Meat that play both.
Sheltered Cove
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Sheltered Cove that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Stand Ground
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Stand Ground that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Quickstep
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Quickstep that play both.
Stadium Centerpiece
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Stadium Centerpiece that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Refraction Bolters
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Blossom of Spring
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Mage Master Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Ticket Puncher
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Ticket Puncher that play both.
Weapon
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Jinglewood, Smash Hit that play both.
Mandible Claw
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Mandible Claw that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
High Riser
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and High Riser that play both.
Teklo Plasma Pistol
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Teklo Plasma Pistol that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Encore
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Encore that play both.
Song of the Shining Knight
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Song of the Shining Knight that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.541.535714286
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Song of the Rosen Matador
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Song of the Rosen Matador that play both.
Song of Yesteryears
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Song of Yesteryears that play both.
Song of Sweet Nectar
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Song of Sweet Nectar that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Cash Out
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Cash Out that play both.
Starting Stake
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Starting Stake that play both.
Song of Jack-be-Quick
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Song of Jack-be-Quick that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Flourish that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Germinate that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Truce that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Strong Yield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Strong Yield (Red) that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Arc Lightning that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
Pop the Bubble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Pop the Bubble (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and This Round's on Me that play both.
Pick a Card, Any Card (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Pick a Card, Any Card (Red) that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Energy Potion that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Spark of Genius
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Spark of Genius that play both.
Song of the Wandering Mind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Song of the Wandering Mind that play both.
Pick a Card, Any Card (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Pick a Card, Any Card (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Lead with Heart (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Cash In that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Final Act
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Final Act that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Plow Under that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Rally the Rearguard (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Performance Bonus (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Blossoming Decay (Yellow) that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Smash Up that play both.
Tongue Tied
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Tongue Tied that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.531.529411765
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.601.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Raging Onslaught (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Raging Onslaught (Blue) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Zero to Sixty (Red) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Down But Not Out (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Down But Not Out (Blue) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Rising Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Rising Power (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Thunk (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Vigorous Windup (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.541.538461538
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Zipper Hit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Zipper Hit (Red) that play both.
Zipper Hit (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Zipper Hit (Yellow) that play both.
T-Bone (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and T-Bone (Blue) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Zero to Sixty (Yellow) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Zero to Sixty (Blue) that play both.
Wage Agility (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wage Agility (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wage Vigor (Yellow) that play both.
Adrenaline Rush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Adrenaline Rush (Red) that play both.
Down But Not Out (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Down But Not Out (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wage Gold (Yellow) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Mighty Windup (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wage Might (Yellow) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Pack Hunt (Yellow) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Clash of Agility (Yellow) that play both.
Pack Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Pack Call (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Lunging Press
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Lunging Press that play both.
Defense Reaction
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.362.363636364
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
1.911.913043478
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Test of Strength that play both.
Crowd Control (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Crowd Control (Red) that play both.
Test of Might
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Test of Might that play both.
Instant
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Kindle that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Fertile Ground (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Fertile Ground (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Interlude (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Interlude (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Embrace Adversity and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.