banner
New
Pursue to the Pits of Despair
140 decks (0.02449%)
Price History
Pursue to the Pits of Despair
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, mark them.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.752.748520858
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.792.786190182
Hero
New
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
New
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Levia, Shadowborn Abomination that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Flick Knives that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Crown of Providence that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
New
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mask of Deceit that play both.
New
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Skullhorn that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
New
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Danger Digits that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nullrune Hood that play both.
New
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
New
Starting Point
Starting Point
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Starting Point that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Arcane Lantern that play both.
New
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Weapon
New
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
New
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Bone Basher
Bone Basher
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Bone Basher that play both.
New
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Spider's Bite that play both.
New
Kunai of Retribution
Kunai of Retribution
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Action
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
New
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.787878788
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Codex of Frailty that play both.
New
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Gravekeeping (Red)
Gravekeeping (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Gravekeeping (Red) that play both.
New
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Kiss of Death that play both.
Truce
Truce
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Truce that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and This Round's on Me that play both.
New
Public Bounty (Red)
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
New
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.588235294
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
New
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
New
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Hunt a Killer (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.804878049
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
New
Sound the Alarm
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Censor that play both.
Bingo
Bingo
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Bingo that play both.
New
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.743589744
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
Critical Strike (Red)
Critical Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Critical Strike (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.794117647
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Ripple Away
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Ripple Away that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Bonds of Agony that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.696969697
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nasty Surprise that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
New
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and For the Dracai that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Surgical Extraction that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.720000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
New
For the Emperor
For the Emperor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and For the Emperor that play both.
New
Thick Hide Hunter
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Enlightened Strike that play both.
New
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Soul Harvest
Soul Harvest
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Soul Harvest that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
New
Mark the Prey (Red)
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
New
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Pain in the Backside that play both.
New
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and March of Loyalty that play both.
New
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
New
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Smash Up
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Smash Up that play both.
New
Wrath of Retribution
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
New
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
New
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
New
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.766666667
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
New
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Searing Gaze that play both.
New
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
New
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
New
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Hunt's End that play both.
New
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blistering Blade that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blade Flurry that play both.
New
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
New
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Endear Devotion that play both.
New
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Provoke that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Just a Nick that play both.
New
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Jagged Edge that play both.
New
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Perforate that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
New
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Imperial Intent that play both.
New
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Incision (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
New
To the Point (Red)
To the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and To the Point (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fate Foreseen that play both.
New
Put in Context
Put in Context
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Put in Context that play both.
Reckless Swing
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Reckless Swing that play both.
New
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.653846154
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Smoke Out that play both.
New
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.629629630
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Den of the Spider that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
New
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.541666667
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Lair of the Spider that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
New
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Calming Breeze that play both.
New
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
New
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Snag
Snag
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Snag that play both.
New
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
New
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
New
Proclaim Vengeance
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Heart of Fyendal that play both.