Pursue to the Pits of Despair
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, mark them.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.702.701614527
Average Defense Value:
2.762.759691586
Hero
Arakni, Marionette
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Levia, Shadowborn Abomination that play both.
Fang
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fang that play both.
Arakni
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Arakni that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Old Knocker
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Old Knocker that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Crown of Providence that play both.
Danger Digits
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Danger Digits that play both.
Mask of Deceit
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Flick Knives
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Flick Knives that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Skullhorn
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Skullhorn that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Hood
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Nullrune Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Starting Point
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Starting Point that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Arcane Lantern
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Red Alert Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Red Alert Boots that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Weapon
Obsidian Fire Vein
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Bone Basher
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Bone Basher that play both.
Spider's Bite
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Spider's Bite that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Romping Club that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Action
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played:
2.762.758064516
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.763636364
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Kiss of Death that play both.
Gravekeeping (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Gravekeeping (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.695652174
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.644444444
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and This Round's on Me that play both.
Truce
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Truce that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Attack Action
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played:
2.712.714285714
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Censor that play both.
Critical Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Critical Strike (Red) that play both.
Bingo
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Bingo that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Command and Conquer that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.759259259
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.612.612903226
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Ripple Away that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nasty Surprise that play both.
For the Dracai
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and For the Dracai that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blaze Headlong that play both.
For the Emperor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and For the Emperor that play both.
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.609756098
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.648648649
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.628571429
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Soul Harvest
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Soul Harvest that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Smash Up that play both.
March of Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and March of Loyalty that play both.
Reaper's Call (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Reaper's Call (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Infect (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.771929825
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Searing Gaze
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Searing Gaze that play both.
Hunt's End
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Hunt's End that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.630434783
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played:
2.682.682926829
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
Blistering Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blistering Blade that play both.
Endear Devotion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Endear Devotion that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blade Flurry that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Provoke that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Just a Nick that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Jagged Edge that play both.
Perforate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Perforate that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Stains of the Redback (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.851851852
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Put in Context
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Put in Context that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Reckless Swing that play both.
Smoke Out
Avg. played:
2.682.681818182
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Smoke Out that play both.
Den of the Spider
Avg. played:
2.152.147058824
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Den of the Spider that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Calming Breeze that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played:
2.702.704545455
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Snag
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Snag that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Heart of Fyendal that play both.