banner
New
Pursue to the Pits of Despair
44 decks (0.008172%)
Price History
Pursue to the Pits of Despair
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, mark them.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.332.326342784
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.762.759926275
Hero
New
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
New
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
New
Fang
Fang
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fang that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Flick Knives that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
New
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Crown of Providence that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
New
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nullrune Hood that play both.
New
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
New
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Danger Digits that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Weapon
New
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
New
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Scale Peeler that play both.
New
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Spider's Bite that play both.
Action
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833333333
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Codex of Frailty that play both.
New
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Kiss of Death that play both.
New
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.785714286
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
New
Public Bounty (Red)
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.727272727
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
New
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
New
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
New
Power Stance
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Power Stance that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
New
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Hunt a Killer (Red) that play both.
New
Cut Deep (Red)
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Bonds of Agony that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Command and Conquer that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.785714286
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blaze Headlong that play both.
New
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
New
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
New
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and For the Dracai that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
New
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.200000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
New
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
New
For the Emperor
For the Emperor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and For the Emperor that play both.
New
Mark the Prey (Red)
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.571428571
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Infect (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Infect (Blue) that play both.
New
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
New
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Pain in the Backside that play both.
New
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and March of Loyalty that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Red)
Reaper's Call (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Reaper's Call (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
New
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
New
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
New
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
New
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
New
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Hunt's End that play both.
New
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Provoke that play both.
New
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Searing Gaze that play both.
New
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
New
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blistering Blade that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blade Flurry that play both.
New
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Jagged Edge that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Just a Nick that play both.
New
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Endear Devotion that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
New
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
New
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Imperial Intent that play both.
New
Stains of the Redback (Blue)
Stains of the Redback (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Stains of the Redback (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
New
Sizzling Steel
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sizzling Steel that play both.
New
Stabbing Pain
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Stabbing Pain that play both.
New
Sisters of Fire
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sisters of Fire that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
New
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.357142857
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Den of the Spider that play both.
New
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.700000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Smoke Out that play both.
New
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Frailty Trap that play both.
New
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Inertia Trap that play both.
Instant
New
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
New
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Pledge Fealty that play both.
New
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
New
Proclaim Vengeance
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Resource
Blood of the Dracai
Blood of the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pursue to the Pits of Despair and Blood of the Dracai that play both.