Sigil of Suffering (Blue)
Runeblade Defense Reaction
Deal 1 arcane damage to the attacking hero.
If you have dealt arcane damage this turn, Sigil of Suffering gains +1 [Defense].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.941.944678689
Average Defense Value:
2.482.475749796
Hero
Viserai, Rune Blood
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Aurora, Shooting Star
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Briar
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Briar that play both.
Vynnset
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Vynnset that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
Aurora
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Aurora that play both.
Equipment
Dyadic Carapace
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Face Purgatory
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Aether Ironweave
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Crown of Providence
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Lightning Greaves
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Well Grounded
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Well Grounded that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Nullrune Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Arcane Lantern
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Bloodied Oval
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Nullrune Hood
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Mage Master Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Ironrot Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Shock Charmers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Shock Charmers that play both.
Mark of Lightning
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Mark of Lightning that play both.
Ornate Tessen
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Ornate Tessen that play both.
Runehold Release
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runehold Release that play both.
Ebon Fold
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Weapon
Star Fall
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Star Fall that play both.
Scepter of Pain
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Reaping Blade
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Reaping Blade that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Flail of Agony
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Flail of Agony that play both.
Dread Scythe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Dread Scythe that play both.
Action
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.872.866666667
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.833333333
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.742574257
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Germinate that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
2.432.432692308
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played:
2.732.730769231
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.692307692
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
2.802.800000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
2.512.511627907
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
2.692.685185185
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Looming Doom that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
2.632.633333333
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.622.622950820
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.730769231
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Thistle Bloom - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Thistle Bloom - Life that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.632.629629630
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
2.692.692307692
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Sizzle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.692307692
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sizzle (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.697674419
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Runeblood Barrier
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runeblood Barrier that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Flash (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Flash (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Bequest the Vast Beyond
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Bequest the Vast Beyond that play both.
Weave Earth (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Weave Earth (Red) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Oath of the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Bramble Spark (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Bramble Spark (Blue) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Electrify (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Electrify (Yellow) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.592.592592593
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Yellow) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Weave Lightning (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Weave Lightning (Yellow) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sigil of the Arknight that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Condemn to Slaughter (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.572.566666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Read the Runes (Blue) that play both.
Electrify (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Electrify (Red) that play both.
Amulet of Earth
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Amulet of Earth that play both.
Bramble Spark (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Bramble Spark (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Sting of Sorcery
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sting of Sorcery that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Harness Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Harness Lightning (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Yellow) that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Blue) that play both.
Flicker Wisp
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Flicker Wisp that play both.
Attack Action
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
2.702.702380952
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Current Funnel that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.684210526
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
2.632.625000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.714285714
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
2.712.711111111
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.326086957
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.295454545
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Plow Under that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Snuff Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Snuff Out that play both.
Lightning Surge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Lightning Surge (Yellow) that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.461538462
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Vantage Point (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Vantage Point (Blue) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Lightning Surge (Blue) that play both.
Rites of Lightning (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rites of Lightning (Yellow) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Rites of Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rites of Lightning (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runerager Swarm (Blue) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Stir the Wildwood (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Stir the Wildwood (Yellow) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcanic Shockwave (Yellow) that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Red)
Avg. played:
1.981.978723404
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcanic Shockwave (Red) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Hocus Pocus (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Blast to Oblivion (Blue) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Explosive Growth (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Explosive Growth (Red) that play both.
Stir the Wildwood (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Stir the Wildwood (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Spellblade Assault (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.042.037037037
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Singeing Steelblade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Singeing Steelblade (Yellow) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.481481481
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcanic Crackle (Blue) that play both.
Drowning Dire (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Drowning Dire (Red) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Lightning Form (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Lightning Form (Red) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Hocus Pocus (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.651898734
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.712121212
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.682.678260870
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sigil of Suffering (Yellow) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.682.682242991
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.682.680851064
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Blue) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.789473684
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.477272727
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.532.529411765
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.552.545454545
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rootbound Carapace (Blue) that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
2.762.761904762
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.722222222
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.650000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Oblivion that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
2.642.636363636
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.414634146
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.514285714
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played:
1.871.865384615
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Lightning Press (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Lightning Press (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arknight Shard that play both.