Sigil of Suffering (Blue)
Runeblade Defense Reaction
Deal 1 arcane damage to the attacking hero.
If you have dealt arcane damage this turn, Sigil of Suffering gains +1 [Defense].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.801.803451856
Average Defense Value:
2.452.453889288
Hero
Viserai, Rune Blood
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Vynnset
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Vynnset that play both.
Briar
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Briar that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
Equipment
Vexing Quillhand
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Crown of Providence
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Aether Ironweave
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Bloodied Oval
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Balance of Justice
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Ornate Tessen
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Ornate Tessen that play both.
Ironrot Helm
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Carrion Husk
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Carrion Husk that play both.
Mage Master Boots
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Ebon Fold
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mark of Lightning
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Mark of Lightning that play both.
Ironhide Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Ironhide Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
Frontline Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Frontline Legs that play both.
Weapon
Scepter of Pain
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Flail of Agony
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Flail of Agony that play both.
Reaping Blade
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Dread Scythe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Dread Scythe that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Annals of Sutcliffe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Annals of Sutcliffe that play both.
Action
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
2.422.419354839
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
2.592.588235294
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.701298701
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.602272727
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.653846154
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
2.352.346153846
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
2.742.736842105
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Looming Doom that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.342.343750000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.602.595744681
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.572.565217391
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Runeblood Barrier
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runeblood Barrier that play both.
Flash (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Flash (Yellow) that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Weave Earth (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Weave Earth (Red) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.687500000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Electrify (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Electrify (Yellow) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.645161290
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Weave Lightning (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Weave Lightning (Yellow) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.482.478260870
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Yellow) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Amulet of Earth
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Amulet of Earth that play both.
Bramble Spark (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Bramble Spark (Blue) that play both.
Bramble Spark (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Bramble Spark (Yellow) that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
2.442.437500000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Bequest the Vast Beyond
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Bequest the Vast Beyond that play both.
Electrify (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Electrify (Red) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Oath of the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Read the Runes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.452.450000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Read the Runes (Blue) that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
2.482.476190476
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Vile Inquisition (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Vile Inquisition (Red) that play both.
Vile Inquisition (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Vile Inquisition (Blue) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Blue) that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
2.612.607142857
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
2.742.742857143
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Lightning Surge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Lightning Surge (Yellow) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.687500000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Lightning Surge (Blue) that play both.
Rites of Lightning (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rites of Lightning (Yellow) that play both.
Rites of Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
1.331.333333333
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rites of Lightning (Red) that play both.
Stir the Wildwood (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Stir the Wildwood (Yellow) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcanic Shockwave (Yellow) that play both.
Explosive Growth (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Explosive Growth (Red) that play both.
Stir the Wildwood (Red)
Avg. played:
1.381.375000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Stir the Wildwood (Red) that play both.
Singeing Steelblade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Singeing Steelblade (Yellow) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Red)
Avg. played:
1.461.458333333
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcanic Shockwave (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Vela Flash (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Vela Flash (Yellow) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Drowning Dire (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Drowning Dire (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Spellblade Strike (Blue) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Spellblade Assault (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.609523810
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.642.638554217
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.622.623529412
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sigil of Suffering (Yellow) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.635135135
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Blue) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.408450704
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.152.145833333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Oblivion that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.272727273
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.423076923
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Lightning Press (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Lightning Press (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Blue) and Arknight Shard that play both.