Strategic Planning (Blue)
Generic Action
Put an action card with cost 0 from a graveyard on the bottom of its owner's deck. At the beginning of the end phase, draw a card.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.781.779106328
Average Defense Value: Β
2.432.432277488
Hero
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
New
Tuffnut
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Tuffnut that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Iyslander, Stormbind
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Iyslander, Stormbind that play both.
Valda, Seismic Impact
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Kano, Dracai of Aether
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Viserai, Rune Blood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Boots
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Metacarpus Node
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Storm Striders that play both.
Sealace Sarong
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Hood
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Coronet Peak
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Coronet Peak that play both.
Crown of Dominion
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Mage Master Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Arcane Lantern
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Base of the Mountain
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Sunkwater Pincers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Sunkwater Pincers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Lightning Greaves
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Skullhorn
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Skullhorn that play both.
Prized Galea
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Prized Galea that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Bandana of the Blue Beyond
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Bandana of the Blue Beyond that play both.
Cogwerx Tinker Rings
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Cogwerx Tinker Rings that play both.
Flick Knives
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Ironhide Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Blossom of Spring
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Aether Ironweave
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Perch Grapplers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Weapon
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
Waning Moon
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Waning Moon that play both.
Rok
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Rok that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Jinglewood, Smash Hit that play both.
Cogwerx Blunderbuss
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Cogwerx Blunderbuss that play both.
Action
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Draw a Crowd
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Draw a Crowd that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Promising Terrain that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.542.544303797
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Energy Potion that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Flurry Stance that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.552.547169811
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.564102564
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Big Game Trophy Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Big Game Trophy Shot that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.484848485
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Frost Hex
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Frost Hex that play both.
Ice Eternal
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Ice Eternal that play both.
Insidious Chill
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Insidious Chill that play both.
Frosting (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Frosting (Blue) that play both.
Aether Hail (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Aether Hail (Blue) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Aether Icevein (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Aether Icevein (Red) that play both.
Cold Snap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Cold Snap (Blue) that play both.
Ice Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Ice Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Power Stance that play both.
Aether Icevein (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Aether Icevein (Blue) that play both.
Strategic Planning (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Strategic Planning (Red) that play both.
Potion of Luck
Avg. played: Β
2.622.616666667
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Potion of Luck that play both.
Polar Blast (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Polar Blast (Blue) that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Blazing Aether that play both.
Strategic Planning (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.593220339
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Strategic Planning (Yellow) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.522.523076923
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Brain Freeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Brain Freeze (Blue) that play both.
Rolling Thunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Rolling Thunder that play both.
Song of Sweet Nectar
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Song of Sweet Nectar that play both.
Song of the Rosen Matador
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Song of the Rosen Matador that play both.
Song of the Shining Knight
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Song of the Shining Knight that play both.
Song of Yesteryears
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Song of Yesteryears that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Imperial Ledger
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Imperial Ledger that play both.
Fire in the Hole
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Fire in the Hole that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Drop the Anchor
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Drop the Anchor that play both.
Gold the Tip
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Gold the Tip that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Loan Shark that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Regain Composure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Regain Composure that play both.
Tit for Tat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Tit for Tat that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Song of Jack-be-Quick
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Song of Jack-be-Quick that play both.
Song of the Wandering Mind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Song of the Wandering Mind that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Plan for the Worst
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Plan for the Worst that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Truce that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Unsheathed that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Sift (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.752.745283019
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Blue Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Blue Fin Harpoon that play both.
King Kraken Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and King Kraken Harpoon that play both.
King Shark Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and King Shark Harpoon that play both.
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Yellow Fin Harpoon that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Put 'Em In Their Place
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Put 'Em In Their Place that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Headbutt that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β
2.582.575000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Give and Take that play both.
Final Act
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Final Act that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Rusty Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Rusty Harpoon that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Crash Down the Gates (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Crash Down the Gates (Red) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Wounded Bull (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Wounded Bull (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Swing Big that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Perforate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Perforate that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Provoke that play both.
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
Take a Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Take a Stab (Blue) that play both.
Take a Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Take a Stab (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.732323232
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.352.351562500
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and That All You Got? that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Saving Grace that play both.
Tarpit Trap
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Tarpit Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Block
Return Fire
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Return Fire that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Pinion Sentry
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Pinion Sentry that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.560747664
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.901.901785714
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.506172840
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Brainstorm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Brainstorm that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Blizzard
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Blizzard that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Interlude (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Interlude (Blue) that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Kindle that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Strategic Planning (Blue) and Eye of Ophidia that play both.