Infectious Host (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks a hero, if you control a Frailty token, create a Frailty token under their control, then repeat for Inertia and Bloodrot Pox.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.712.712660109
Average Defense Value:
2.402.404184125
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Aurora, Shooting Star
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Fai, Rising Rebellion
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Old Knocker
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Crown of Providence
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Shock Charmers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Shock Charmers that play both.
Tide Flippers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Mask of Momentum
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Aether Ironweave
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Mask of Deceit
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Lightning Greaves
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Face Purgatory
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Crown of Seeds
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Crown of Seeds that play both.
Nullrune Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Danger Digits
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Well Grounded
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Breaking Scales
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Aurum Aegis
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Arcane Lantern
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Rosetta Thorn
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Star Fall
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Obsidian Fire Vein
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Searing Emberblade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Searing Emberblade that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Action
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Sapphire Amulet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sapphire Amulet that play both.
Anthem of Spring
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Anthem of Spring that play both.
Force of Nature
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Force of Nature that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.812.813664596
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.282.283400810
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.302.296610169
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
2.632.628865979
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Germinate that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Premeditate that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Captain's Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Captain's Call (Blue) that play both.
Rise from the Ashes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Rise from the Ashes (Red) that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.892.890554723
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.912.905362776
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.881469115
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.812.814625850
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.862.863727455
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played:
2.762.756097561
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Current Funnel that play both.
Exude Confidence
Avg. played:
2.572.571984436
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Exude Confidence that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Lava Burst that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played:
2.632.631313131
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
For the Dracai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and For the Dracai that play both.
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Rites of Replenishment (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Rites of Replenishment (Red) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Spreading Flames
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Spreading Flames that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
2.602.604477612
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.472.466666667
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
2.462.458333333
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
2.482.475806452
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Down and Dirty
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Down and Dirty that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Censor that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played:
2.552.545454545
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Tenacity that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Dishonor that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcanic Shockwave (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Attack Reaction
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Searing Gaze
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Searing Gaze that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Hunt's End
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Hunt's End that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Endear Devotion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Endear Devotion that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Blistering Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Blistering Blade that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
1.511.514563107
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.846410684
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.692.688741722
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Smoke Out
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Smoke Out that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Saving Grace that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Hold the Line that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Remembrance that play both.