banner
Infectious Host (Red)
938 decks (0.1425%)
Price History
Infectious Host (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks a hero, if you control a Frailty token, create a Frailty token under their control, then repeat for Inertia and Bloodrot Pox.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.712.712033947
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.402.404135281
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Aurora, Shooting Star
Aurora, Shooting Star
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Briar, Warden of Thorns
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
Dyadic Carapace
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
Swiftstrike Bracers
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
Grasp of the Arknight
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
Crown of Dichotomy
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Shock Charmers
Shock Charmers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Shock Charmers that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Aether Ironweave
Aether Ironweave
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
Vexing Quillhand
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Lightning Greaves
Lightning Greaves
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Face Purgatory
Face Purgatory
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Crown of Seeds
Crown of Seeds
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Crown of Seeds that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
Helm of Halo's Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
Warpath of Winged Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Breaking Scales
Breaking Scales
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
Spellbound Creepers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
Gambler's Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Aurum Aegis
Aurum Aegis
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Rosetta Thorn
Rosetta Thorn
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Star Fall
Star Fall
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Searing Emberblade
Searing Emberblade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Searing Emberblade that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Action
Flying High (Red)
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Sapphire Amulet
Sapphire Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sapphire Amulet that play both.
Anthem of Spring
Anthem of Spring
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Anthem of Spring that play both.
Force of Nature
Force of Nature
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Force of Nature that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.813664596
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Arc Lightning
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.283400810
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.296610169
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.628865979
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Germinate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Germinate that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Premeditate
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Premeditate that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Captain's Call (Blue)
Captain's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Captain's Call (Blue) that play both.
Rise from the Ashes (Red)
Rise from the Ashes (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Rise from the Ashes (Red) that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.891891892
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.905362776
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.882943144
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.816013629
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.865461847
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Current Funnel
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Current Funnel that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.756097561
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Exude Confidence
Exude Confidence
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.571984436
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Exude Confidence that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Lava Burst that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.631313131
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and For the Dracai that play both.
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Rites of Replenishment (Red)
Rites of Replenishment (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Rites of Replenishment (Red) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Spreading Flames
Spreading Flames
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Spreading Flames that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.604477612
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Standing Order
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.466666667
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.458333333
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.475806452
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Down and Dirty
Down and Dirty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Down and Dirty that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Censor that play both.
Tenacity
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.545454545
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Tenacity that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Dishonor
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Dishonor that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Red)
Arcanic Shockwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcanic Shockwave (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Attack Reaction
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Searing Gaze that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Hunt's End that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Endear Devotion that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Blistering Blade that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.511.514563107
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.846410684
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.688741722
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Smoke Out that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Saving Grace
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Saving Grace that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Hold the Line
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Hold the Line that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Channel Lightning Valley
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Art of War
Art of War
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Infectious Host (Red) and Remembrance that play both.