Lead with Power (Blue)
Guardian,brute Action
Your next Brute or Guardian attack this turn gets +1{p}.
Create a Might token.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.733.727394477
Average Defense Value: Β
2.462.464234718
Hero
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Terra
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Terra that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Betsy
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Betsy that play both.
Kayo
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Kayo that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Rhinar
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Rhinar that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
New
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Kayo, Underhanded Cheat that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlet of Might
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Civic Steps
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Boots
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Tectonic Plating
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Savage Sash
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Savage Sash that play both.
Craterhoof
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Craterhoof that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Flat Trackers
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Stand Ground
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Stand Ground that play both.
Raw Meat
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Raw Meat that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Nullrune Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Knucklehead
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Knucklehead that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Arcane Lantern
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Skullhorn
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Skullhorn that play both.
Crown of Providence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Beaten Trackers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Vigor Girth
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Monstrous Veil
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Monstrous Veil that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Hide Tanner
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Hide Tanner that play both.
Crater Fist
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Crater Fist that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Golden Glare
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Golden Glare that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Mandible Claw
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Mandible Claw that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Rok
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Rok that play both.
Redwood Hammer
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Ball Breaker
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Ball Breaker that play both.
Mini Meataxe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Mini Meataxe that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Romping Club that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.453917051
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.262.259259259
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.702.697368421
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
2.442.440613027
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.461538462
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.474178404
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Lead with Heart (Blue) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β
2.392.389534884
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.477157360
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.317880795
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.489473684
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.472826087
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Tit for Tat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Tit for Tat that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Leave a Dent that play both.
Lead with Power (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.564625850
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Lead with Power (Yellow) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Buckle that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.464566929
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Public Bounty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Public Bounty (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.438596491
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.451327434
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Talk a Big Game that play both.
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Double Down that play both.
Seeds of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Seeds of Strength that play both.
Big Bop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Big Bop (Blue) that play both.
Regain Composure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Regain Composure that play both.
Pearl Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Pearl Amulet that play both.
Attack Action
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.433774834
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.321285141
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.762.756756757
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.272300469
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.412213740
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.340206186
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.292.293103448
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.479820628
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.672.672727273
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Bet Big that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.362068966
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.458128079
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.360946746
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.658227848
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Mighty Windup (Red) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Headbutt that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.414285714
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Splatter Skull
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Splatter Skull that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.421428571
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Pack Call (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Pack Call (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.575000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Rising Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Rising Power (Red) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Rally the Rearguard (Yellow) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Rally the Rearguard (Red) that play both.
Pack Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Pack Call (Blue) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.473684211
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Swing Big that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Rising Power (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Rising Power (Yellow) that play both.
Down But Not Out (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Down But Not Out (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.494117647
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.473958333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.524271845
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.582.581395349
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Test of Strength that play both.
Run into Trouble
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Run into Trouble that play both.
Instant
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Blue) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.