Zealous Belting (Blue)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
While there is a card in your pitch zone with [Power] greater than Zealous Belting's base [Power], Zealous Belting has go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.484.476134903
Average Defense Value: Β
2.582.584107349
Hero
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
200% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Terra
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Terra that play both.
Bravo
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Bravo that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Equipment
Craterhoof
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Craterhoof that play both.
Nullrune Boots
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Civic Steps
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Civic Steps that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Tectonic Plating
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Hood
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Crater Fist
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Crater Fist that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Arcane Lantern
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Aurum Aegis
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Stand Ground
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Stand Ground that play both.
Ironrot Legs
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Ironhide Legs
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Golden Glare
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Golden Glare that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Sealace Sarong
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Glidewell Fins
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Glidewell Fins that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Time Skippers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Time Skippers that play both.
Mage Master Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Toxic Tips
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Bastion of Duty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Well Grounded
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Well Grounded that play both.
Deep Blue
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Crown of Dominion
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Vigor Girth
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Bunker Beard
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Bunker Beard that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Redwood Hammer
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
2.202.200000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.712.706422018
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Big Game Trophy Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Big Game Trophy Shot that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742857143
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.632.625000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
2.592.592592593
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.582.576923077
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Show Time! that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.625000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Midas Touch that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Flying High (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Flying High (Yellow) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Premeditate that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Buckle that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Flourish that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Sloggism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Sloggism (Blue) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Attack Action
Break Stature
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Break Stature that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Headbutt that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.580882353
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.722.720720721
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.672.672413793
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.558139535
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.690000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.592920354
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.619047619
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.606060606
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Bet Big that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.280303030
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.690476190
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.642.636363636
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Blue Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Blue Fin Harpoon that play both.
King Kraken Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and King Kraken Harpoon that play both.
King Shark Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and King Shark Harpoon that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Yellow Fin Harpoon that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.642.638888889
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.712.709677419
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and The Golden Son that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.622.623188406
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Star Struck that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.522.521126761
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.368421053
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Zealous Belting (Yellow) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.491803279
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.425925926
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Crush Confidence (Blue) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.625000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.622.615384615
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.413043478
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.428571429
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.478260870
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.425000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.523809524
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Give and Take that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Pulverize that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played: Β
2.512.513513514
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Pay Up
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Pay Up that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Ripple Away that play both.
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Blue) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Death Touch (Blue) that play both.
Raging Onslaught (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Raging Onslaught (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.292.290697674
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.388429752
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.303571429
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Exposed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Exposed that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.568000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.302.300000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.572.573333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.514705882
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.652.653061224
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Test of Strength that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Trounce that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.545454545
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Blue) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.