Humble (Blue)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, that hero loses all abilities until the end of their next turn. (Treat the hero card as if the text box is empty.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.882.880022094
Average Defense Value: Β
2.422.416089415
Hero
Gravy Bones
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Gravy Bones that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Scurv, Stowaway
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Equipment
Gold-Baited Hook
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Nullrune Boots
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Peg Leg
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Peg Leg that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Nullrune Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Arousing Wave
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Nullrune Robe
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcane Lantern
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Dominion
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Mage Master Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Quartermaster's Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Quartermaster's Boots that play both.
Quick Clicks
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Quick Clicks that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Dead Threads
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Dead Threads that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Sealace Sarong
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Aurum Aegis
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Flick Knives
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Time Skippers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Time Skippers that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Fleet Foot Sandals
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Fleet Foot Sandals that play both.
Ironrot Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Mask of Perdition
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Toxic Tips
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Redback Shroud
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Ironhide Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Mask of Deceit
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Danger Digits
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Danger Digits that play both.
Weapon
Talishar, the Lost Prince
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Spider's Bite
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Jinglewood, Smash Hit that play both.
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
Orbitoclast
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Flail of Agony
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Flail of Agony that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Kunai of Retribution
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Action
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Shifting Tides that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Cash Out
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Cash Out that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Truce that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Germinate that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Give No Quarter
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Give No Quarter that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Loan Shark that play both.
Mutiny on the Battalion Barque
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Mutiny on the Battalion Barque that play both.
Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Avast Ye! that play both.
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Chowder, Hearty Cook that play both.
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Loot the Hold that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Riggermortis that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
Big Game Trophy Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Big Game Trophy Shot that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Encore
Avg. played: Β
1.351.351351351
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Encore that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
1.671.666666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Song of Yesteryears
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Song of Yesteryears that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Song of the Shining Knight
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Song of the Shining Knight that play both.
Song of Sweet Nectar
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Song of Sweet Nectar that play both.
Pick a Card, Any Card (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Pick a Card, Any Card (Blue) that play both.
Song of the Rosen Matador
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Song of the Rosen Matador that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Energy Potion that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.252.250000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.632.628318584
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played: Β
2.442.437500000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Final Act
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Final Act that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.292.285714286
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Strike Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Strike Gold (Blue) that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Angry Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Angry Bones (Blue) that play both.
Burly Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Burly Bones (Blue) that play both.
Restless Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Restless Bones (Blue) that play both.
Blue Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Blue Fin Harpoon that play both.
King Kraken Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and King Kraken Harpoon that play both.
King Shark Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and King Shark Harpoon that play both.
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Yellow Fin Harpoon that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.470588235
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Blue) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.462.457627119
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β
2.592.590909091
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
2.522.517857143
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Blue) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Brutal Assault (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Brutal Assault (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Shake Down that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Rally the Rearguard (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Raging Onslaught (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Raging Onslaught (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Humble (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Humble (Yellow) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Wreck Havoc (Blue) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Amnesia that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.388888889
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.476190476
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.328125000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Just a Nick that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β
2.552.550000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Siren's Call that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.572580645
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.512.507462687
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Block
Instant
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.428571429
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.416666667
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Art of War that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.463414634
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Blue) and Eye of Ophidia that play both.