banner
Cut Down to Size (Blue)
447 decks (0.06790%)
Price History
Cut Down to Size (Blue)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.123.124225917
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.542.538933228
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Gravy Bones
Gravy Bones
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Gravy Bones that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
Melody, Sing-along
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Uzuri
Uzuri
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Uzuri that play both.
Equipment
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
Compass of Sunken Depths
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
Gold-Baited Hook
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Peg Leg
Peg Leg
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Peg Leg that play both.
Dead Threads
Dead Threads
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Dead Threads that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Quick Clicks
Quick Clicks
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Quick Clicks that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
Swiftstrike Bracers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Traverse the Universe
Traverse the Universe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Time Skippers that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Meridian Pathway
Meridian Pathway
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Ironhide Legs
Ironhide Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Starting Point
Starting Point
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Starting Point that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
Enchanted Quiver
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Calming Gesture
Calming Gesture
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Aurum Aegis
Aurum Aegis
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scale Peeler that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
Talishar, the Lost Prince
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Jinglewood, Smash Hit that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Action
Rowdy Locals
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.743902439
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Chart the High Seas
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Give No Quarter
Give No Quarter
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Give No Quarter that play both.
Portside Exchange
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Shifting Tides
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Shifting Tides that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Avast Ye! that play both.
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Chowder, Hearty Cook that play both.
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Loot the Hold
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Loot the Hold that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Riggermortis
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Riggermortis that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Wailer Humperdinck
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
Arc Lightning
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arc Lightning that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Germinate
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Germinate that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
1.801.800000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Dual Threat that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Cash Out
Cash Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cash Out that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Truce
Truce
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Truce that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.740540541
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Strike Gold (Blue)
Strike Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Strike Gold (Blue) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Moon
Second Tenet of Chi: Moon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Second Tenet of Chi: Moon that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.684684685
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.437500000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.432432432
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.651162791
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.530303030
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Final Act
Final Act
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Final Act that play both.
Humble (Blue)
Humble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.467741935
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Blue) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Yellow) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Blue) that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Censor that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Eradicate that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Just a Nick that play both.
Siren's Call
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Siren's Call that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.838095238
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.828571429
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.575000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.457943925
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Tide Chakra (Red)
Tide Chakra (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tide Chakra (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.416666667
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642857143
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.464000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454545455
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.492307692
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.