Cut Down to Size (Blue)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.183.183889725
Average Defense Value:
2.552.550060542
Hero
Nuu, Alluring Desire
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Uzuri
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Uzuri that play both.
Nuu
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nuu that play both.
Aurora, Shooting Star
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Terra
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Terra that play both.
Equipment
Undertow Stilettos
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Arcane Lantern
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Robe
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Traverse the Universe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Time Skippers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Time Skippers that play both.
Flick Knives
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Meridian Pathway
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Ironhide Legs
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Blossom of Spring
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Ironrot Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Toxic Tips
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Lightning Greaves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Calming Gesture
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Face Purgatory
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Redback Shroud
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Hard Knuckle
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Hard Knuckle that play both.
Weapon
Beckoning Mistblade
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Spider's Bite
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Jinglewood, Smash Hit that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Redwood Hammer
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Action
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.692.692307692
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Encore
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Encore that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Song of Yesteryears
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Song of Yesteryears that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Unsheathed that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played:
2.912.913461538
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
2.912.910891089
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Moon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Second Tenet of Chi: Moon that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.702.696078431
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.702702703
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.413043478
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
2.492.488636364
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Final Act
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Final Act that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.522.517857143
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Yellow) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Censor that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Eradicate that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Humble (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.522.523809524
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Lightning Form (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Lightning Form (Red) that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Snuff Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Snuff Out that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Just a Nick that play both.
Siren's Call
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Siren's Call that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.862.855769231
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.852941176
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.556603774
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Tide Chakra (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tide Chakra (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.421052632
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.402.403846154
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.644736842
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.452.448598131
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Test of Strength that play both.
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.495867769
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.428571429
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Blue) that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Yellow) that play both.