Cut Down to Size (Blue)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.183.176336449
Average Defense Value:
2.552.551292422
Hero
Nuu, Alluring Desire
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Uzuri
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Uzuri that play both.
Nuu
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nuu that play both.
Equipment
Undertow Stilettos
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Nullrune Hood
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Robe
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Calming Gesture
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Traverse the Universe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Flick Knives
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Time Skippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Time Skippers that play both.
Blossom of Spring
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Meridian Pathway
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Ironhide Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Toxic Tips
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Ironrot Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Redback Shroud
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Well Grounded
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Well Grounded that play both.
Face Purgatory
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Weapon
Beckoning Mistblade
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Spider's Bite
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Jinglewood, Smash Hit that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Action
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.682.682926829
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rage Specter that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Encore
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Encore that play both.
Truce
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Truce that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Song of Yesteryears
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Song of Yesteryears that play both.
Astral Etchings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Astral Etchings (Red) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played:
2.912.909090909
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
2.902.897196262
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.752.752808989
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Moon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Second Tenet of Chi: Moon that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.692.689320388
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.424528302
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.662.658536585
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
2.492.489361702
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.522.515151515
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Snuff Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Snuff Out that play both.
Final Act
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Final Act that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Yellow) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Censor that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Humble (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.532.533333333
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Eradicate that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Smash Up that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Wind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Second Tenet of Chi: Wind that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Attack Reaction
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Just a Nick that play both.
Siren's Call
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Siren's Call that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.839622642
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.839622642
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.553571429
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.442.435643564
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Tide Chakra (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tide Chakra (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.392.392857143
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.631578947
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.462.462809917
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and That All You Got? that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.460317460
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.467741935
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.