Cut Down to Size (Blue)

Cut Down to Size (Blue)
94 decks (0.06227%)
Price History
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.563.559067046
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.502.498047969
Formats
Number Played
Average number played (CC):Β 
2.682.680000000
Average number played (Blitz):Β 
1.841.840909091
Hero
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Uzuri
Uzuri
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Uzuri that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Soulbond Resolve
Soulbond Resolve
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Soulbond Resolve that play both.
Ironhide Legs
Ironhide Legs
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
Trench of Sunken Treasure
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crater Fist that play both.
Perch Grapplers
Perch Grapplers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
Ironhide Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
Gambler's Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Skullhorn that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Time Skippers that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Ironhide Plate
Ironhide Plate
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Plate that play both.
Weapon
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
Talishar, the Lost Prince
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Anothos that play both.
Death Dealer
Death Dealer
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Death Dealer that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Romping Club
Romping Club
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Romping Club that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Action
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Premeditate
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Premeditate that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Energy Potion that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Come to Fight (Blue)
Come to Fight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Come to Fight (Blue) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454545455
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Burdens of the Past
Burdens of the Past
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Burdens of the Past that play both.
Sloggism (Blue)
Sloggism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sloggism (Blue) that play both.
Healing Balm (Red)
Healing Balm (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Healing Balm (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Censor that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.659090909
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.291666667
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.772727273
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Star Struck that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.590909091
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.450000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.437500000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.571428571
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Swing Big that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Eradicate that play both.
Raging Onslaught (Blue)
Raging Onslaught (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Raging Onslaught (Blue) that play both.
Humble (Blue)
Humble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.538461538
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Blue) that play both.
Brutal Assault (Blue)
Brutal Assault (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Brutal Assault (Blue) that play both.
Remorseless
Remorseless
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Remorseless that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.416666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Amnesia
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Amnesia that play both.
Battering Bolt
Battering Bolt
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Battering Bolt that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454545455
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Yellow) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue)
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Shake Down that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Give and Take that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infiltrate that play both.
Hamstring Shot (Red)
Hamstring Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Hamstring Shot (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Wounded Bull (Red)
Wounded Bull (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wounded Bull (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.285714286
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Lumina Lance
Lumina Lance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Lumina Lance that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.523809524
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.384615385
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.538461538
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.451612903
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Hold the Line
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Hold the Line that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and That All You Got? that play both.
Pitfall Trap
Pitfall Trap
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pitfall Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Boulder Trap
Boulder Trap
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Boulder Trap that play both.
Tripwire Trap
Tripwire Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tripwire Trap that play both.
Rockslide Trap
Rockslide Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rockslide Trap that play both.
Tarpit Trap
Tarpit Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tarpit Trap that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.740740741
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.437500000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Protection
Figment of Protection
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.451.454545455
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Plague Hive that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.