Cut Down to Size (Blue)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.563.559067046
Average Defense Value:
2.502.498047969
Formats
Number Played
Average number played (CC):
2.682.680000000
Average number played (Blitz):
1.841.840909091
Hero
Prism, Awakener of Sol
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Uzuri
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Uzuri that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Gloves
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Boots
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Arcane Lantern
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Soulbond Resolve
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Soulbond Resolve that play both.
Ironhide Legs
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Toxic Tips
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Ironrot Legs
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Mask of Perdition
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Crater Fist
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crater Fist that play both.
Perch Grapplers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Tectonic Plating
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Mage Master Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Skullhorn
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Skullhorn that play both.
Flick Knives
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Mask of Momentum
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Time Skippers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Time Skippers that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Ironhide Plate
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Plate that play both.
Weapon
Decimator Great Axe
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Spider's Bite
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Orbitoclast
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Scale Peeler
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Anothos
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Anothos that play both.
Death Dealer
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Death Dealer that play both.
Titan's Fist
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Romping Club
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Romping Club that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Action
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Premeditate that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Energy Potion that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Come to Fight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Come to Fight (Blue) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.452.454545455
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Burdens of the Past
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Burdens of the Past that play both.
Sloggism (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sloggism (Blue) that play both.
Healing Balm (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Healing Balm (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Censor that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.662.659090909
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.291666667
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.772727273
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Star Struck that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.592.590909091
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
2.452.450000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.437500000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played:
2.572.571428571
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Swing Big that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Eradicate that play both.
Raging Onslaught (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Raging Onslaught (Blue) that play both.
Humble (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.542.538461538
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Blue) that play both.
Brutal Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Brutal Assault (Blue) that play both.
Remorseless
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Remorseless that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.416666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Amnesia that play both.
Battering Bolt
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Battering Bolt that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.452.454545455
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Yellow) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Shake Down that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Give and Take that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infiltrate that play both.
Hamstring Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Hamstring Shot (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Wounded Bull (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wounded Bull (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.555555556
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.292.285714286
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Lumina Lance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Lumina Lance that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.522.523809524
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.384615385
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.538461538
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.452.451612903
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Hold the Line that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and That All You Got? that play both.
Pitfall Trap
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pitfall Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Boulder Trap
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Boulder Trap that play both.
Tripwire Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tripwire Trap that play both.
Rockslide Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rockslide Trap that play both.
Tarpit Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tarpit Trap that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.740740741
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.437500000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.451.454545455
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Plague Hive that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.