Cut Down to Size (Blue)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.333.333940586
Average Defense Value:
2.452.447722395
Hero
Melody, Sing-along
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate that play both.
Uzuri
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Uzuri that play both.
Victor Goldmane
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Boots
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Quickstep
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Quickstep that play both.
Crown of Dominion
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Teklo Base Arms
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Teklo Base Arms that play both.
Teklo Base Legs
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Teklo Base Legs that play both.
Cogwerx Base Arms
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cogwerx Base Arms that play both.
Cogwerx Base Chest
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cogwerx Base Chest that play both.
Cogwerx Base Head
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cogwerx Base Head that play both.
Cogwerx Base Legs
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cogwerx Base Legs that play both.
Nom de Plume
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nom de Plume that play both.
Aurum Aegis
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ironrot Legs
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Ironhide Legs
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Mage Master Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Toxic Tips
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Ironhide Plate
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Plate that play both.
Blossom of Spring
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Crater Fist
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crater Fist that play both.
Mask of Perdition
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Tectonic Plating
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Mask of Momentum
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Civic Steps
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Civic Steps that play both.
Weapon
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Jinglewood, Smash Hit that play both.
Teklo Leveler
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Teklo Leveler that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Spider's Bite
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Orbitoclast
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Scale Peeler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Anothos
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Action
Encore
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Encore that play both.
Song of Yesteryears
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Song of Yesteryears that play both.
Song of Sweet Nectar
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Song of Sweet Nectar that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Singularity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Singularity that play both.
Song of the Shining Knight
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Song of the Shining Knight that play both.
Song of the Rosen Matador
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Song of the Rosen Matador that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
2.452.451612903
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Starting Stake
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Starting Stake that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Memory
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Evo Steel Soul Memory that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Processor
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Evo Steel Soul Processor that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Song of Jack-be-Quick
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Song of Jack-be-Quick that play both.
Come to Fight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Come to Fight (Blue) that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Energy Potion that play both.
Cash Out
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cash Out that play both.
Attack Action
Final Act
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Final Act that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.522.520547945
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.424242424
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
2.322.320754717
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Down But Not Out (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.428571429
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Down But Not Out (Blue) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ripple Away that play both.
War Machine
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and War Machine that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.392.390243902
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Meganetic Protocol
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Meganetic Protocol that play both.
Terminator Tank
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Terminator Tank that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and The Golden Son that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.588235294
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Yellow) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played:
2.392.392857143
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Brutal Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Brutal Assault (Blue) that play both.
Raging Onslaught (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Raging Onslaught (Blue) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wage Gold (Yellow) that play both.
Scrap Compactor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scrap Compactor (Blue) that play both.
Junkyard Dogg (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Junkyard Dogg (Blue) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Censor that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Humble (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.482.480000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Blue) that play both.
Mechanical Strength (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mechanical Strength (Blue) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.482.478260870
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.454545455
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Swing Big that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Adrenaline Rush (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Adrenaline Rush (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.402.403225806
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.478873239
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.372.368421053
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.432989691
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.362.358208955
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and That All You Got? that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Test of Strength that play both.
Steel Street Enforcement
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Steel Street Enforcement that play both.
Firewall (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Firewall (Red) that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.358490566
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.437500000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Fabricate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fabricate that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Art of War that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.