Cut Down to Size (Blue)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.123.122732704
Average Defense Value: Β
2.542.536690502
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Scurv, Stowaway
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Gravy Bones
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Gravy Bones that play both.
Uzuri
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Uzuri that play both.
Equipment
Gold-Baited Hook
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Arousing Wave
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Arcane Lantern
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Robe
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Dead Threads
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Dead Threads that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Peg Leg
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Peg Leg that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Crown of Dominion
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Traverse the Universe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Time Skippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Time Skippers that play both.
Flick Knives
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Buccaneer's Bounty
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Quick Clicks
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Quick Clicks that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Blossom of Spring
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Meridian Pathway
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Ironhide Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Ironrot Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Aurum Aegis
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Toxic Tips
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Redback Shroud
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Spider's Bite
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Jinglewood, Smash Hit that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Action
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β
2.742.738095238
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Avast Ye! that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Give No Quarter
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Give No Quarter that play both.
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Loot the Hold that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Riggermortis that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Germinate that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Dual Threat that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.672.675000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Shifting Tides that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Chowder, Hearty Cook that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Loan Shark that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Midas Touch that play both.
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Sapphire Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sapphire Amulet that play both.
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Scooba, Salty Sea Dog that play both.
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Swabbie that play both.
Shelly, Hardened Traveler
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Shelly, Hardened Traveler that play both.
Platinum Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Platinum Amulet that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Cash Out
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cash Out that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Truce that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Attack Action
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742105263
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689655172
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Moon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Second Tenet of Chi: Moon that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.671.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Strike Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Strike Gold (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played: Β
2.432.434782609
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.438596491
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.651162791
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
HMS Marlin
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and HMS Marlin that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Money or Your Life? (Red) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Money or Your Life? (Yellow) that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sea Legs that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Yellow) that play both.
Paddle Faster
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Paddle Faster that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
HMS Barracuda
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and HMS Barracuda that play both.
HMS Kraken
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and HMS Kraken that play both.
Pilfer the Wreck (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pilfer the Wreck (Blue) that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Swiftwater Sloop (Yellow) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.530303030
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Humble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.460317460
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Blue) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Yellow) that play both.
Final Act
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Final Act that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Blue) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Censor that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Eradicate that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Just a Nick that play both.
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Siren's Call that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.830188679
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.820754717
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.572580645
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.468468468
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Tide Chakra (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Tide Chakra (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.419354839
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.644531250
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.472.472440945
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.252.250000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.458646617
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Not So Fast
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Not So Fast that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.492307692
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Blue) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.