Humble (Yellow)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, that hero loses all abilities until the end of their next turn. (Treat the hero card as if the text box is empty.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.533.531665953
Average Defense Value: Β
2.462.463896798
Hero
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Uzuri
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Uzuri that play both.
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate that play both.
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn that play both.
Kayo
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Kayo that play both.
Equipment
Iris of the Blossom
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Iris of the Blossom that play both.
Okana Scar Wraps
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Okana Scar Wraps that play both.
Robe of Autumn's Fall
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Robe of Autumn's Fall that play both.
Adaptive Dissolver
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Adaptive Dissolver that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Old Knocker
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Old Knocker that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Nullrune Hood
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Dead Threads
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Dead Threads that play both.
Nullrune Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Savage Sash
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Savage Sash that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Evo Heartdrive
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Evo Heartdrive that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Flick Knives
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Flick Knives that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Toxic Tips
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Arcane Lantern
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Evo Shortcircuit
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Evo Shortcircuit that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Skullhorn
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Skullhorn that play both.
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Cogwerx Base Legs
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Cogwerx Base Legs that play both.
Evo Recall
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Evo Recall that play both.
Proto Base Chest
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Proto Base Chest that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Proto Base Legs
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Proto Base Legs that play both.
Knucklehead
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Knucklehead that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Ironsong Versus
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Mask of Perdition
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Fisticuffs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Fisticuffs that play both.
Soulbond Resolve
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Soulbond Resolve that play both.
Starting Point
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Starting Point that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Beaten Trackers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Spider's Bite
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Teklo Leveler
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Teklo Leveler that play both.
Scale Peeler
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Orbitoclast
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Action
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Null Time Zone
Avg. played: Β
1.421.416666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Null Time Zone that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Singularity
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Singularity that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Loot the Hold that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Riggermortis that play both.
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Scooba, Salty Sea Dog that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Memory
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Evo Steel Soul Memory that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Processor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Evo Steel Soul Processor that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Cast Bones
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Cast Bones that play both.
Lumina Ascension
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Lumina Ascension that play both.
Prayer of Bellona
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Prayer of Bellona that play both.
Cognition Nodes
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Cognition Nodes that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Evo Charging Rods
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Evo Charging Rods that play both.
Attack Action
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Seek Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Seek Vengeance that play both.
Enact Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Enact Vengeance that play both.
Seek Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Seek Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Vengeance Never Rests
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Vengeance Never Rests that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Bittering Thorns (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727272727
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.273504274
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.777777778
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.576271186
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.652.653061224
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.581818182
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.563636364
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.545454545
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Scrap Hopper (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Scrap Hopper (Blue) that play both.
Terminator Tank
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Terminator Tank that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Send Packing that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.357142857
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
2.412.409090909
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Erase Face that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Yellow) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Restless Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Restless Bones (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sea Legs that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.428571429
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Blue) that play both.
Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Beast Within that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.523809524
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Swing Big that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.526315789
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Shake Down that play both.
Humble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Humble (Blue) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Runner Runner that play both.
War Machine
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and War Machine that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Already Dead that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Pulping (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pulping (Yellow) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.548387097
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Smash Up that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
V of the Vanguard
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and V of the Vanguard that play both.
Clash of Agility (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Clash of Agility (Yellow) that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Run Roughshod that play both.
T-Bone (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and T-Bone (Blue) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Reincarnate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Reincarnate (Blue) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Amnesia that play both.
Death Touch (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Death Touch (Yellow) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Banneret of Courage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Banneret of Courage that play both.
Beaming Bravado (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Beaming Bravado (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Legacy of Ikaru
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Legacy of Ikaru that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.384615385
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.528301887
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.533333333
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Beacon of Victory
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Beacon of Victory that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.688172043
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.682.683333333
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Hunted or Hunter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Hunted or Hunter that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Fabricate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Fabricate that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.483870968
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Light of Sol
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Light of Sol that play both.