Humble (Yellow)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, that hero loses all abilities until the end of their next turn. (Treat the hero card as if the text box is empty.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.523.521719242
Average Defense Value: Β
2.452.452439855
Hero
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
New
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Uzuri
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Uzuri that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn that play both.
Kayo
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Kayo that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Equipment
Helm of Halo's Grace
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Savage Sash
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Savage Sash that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Crown of Providence
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Nullrune Hood
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Hidden Agenda
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Hidden Agenda that play both.
Sharp Shooters
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sharp Shooters that play both.
Nullrune Boots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Skullhorn
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Skullhorn that play both.
Flick Knives
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Flick Knives that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Toxic Tips
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blossom of Spring
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Ironsong Versus
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Well Grounded
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Well Grounded that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Adaptive Dissolver
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Adaptive Dissolver that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Knucklehead
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Knucklehead that play both.
Hide Tanner
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Hide Tanner that play both.
Soulbond Resolve
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Soulbond Resolve that play both.
Flight Path
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Flight Path that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Fisticuffs
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Fisticuffs that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Beaten Trackers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Warband of Bellona
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Warband of Bellona that play both.
Flat Trackers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Mask of Perdition
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Traverse the Universe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Fleet Foot Sandals
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Fleet Foot Sandals that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Spider's Bite
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Symbiosis Shot
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Symbiosis Shot that play both.
Hot Streak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Hot Streak that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Tiger Taming Khakkara
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Raydn, Duskbane
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Raydn, Duskbane that play both.
Action
Cast Bones
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Cast Bones that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.432.428571429
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Earth's Embrace
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Earth's Embrace that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Germinate that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Truce that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Condemn to Slaughter (Blue) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Condemn to Slaughter (Red) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Condemn to Slaughter (Yellow) that play both.
Flourish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Flourish (Yellow) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Malefic Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Sigil of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sigil of Fyendal that play both.
Sigil of the Arknight
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sigil of the Arknight that play both.
Prayer of Bellona
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Prayer of Bellona that play both.
Lumina Ascension
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Lumina Ascension that play both.
Spirit of Eirina
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Spirit of Eirina that play both.
Gravekeeping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Gravekeeping (Red) that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Wind Chakra (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Wind Chakra (Red) that play both.
Blanch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Blanch (Blue) that play both.
Blanch (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Blanch (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.818181818
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.222.224489796
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.712.709090909
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Smash Up that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Send Packing that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.557692308
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.568627451
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.562500000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.705882353
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Run Roughshod that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.350000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.520000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Beast Within that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Runner Runner that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.612.611111111
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
2.422.416666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Erase Face that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Swing Big that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Clash of Agility (Yellow) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Plow Under that play both.
Splatter Skull
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Splatter Skull that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Blast to Oblivion (Blue) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Blast to Oblivion (Yellow) that play both.
Earth Form (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Earth Form (Blue) that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Earth Form (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Earth Form (Yellow) that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Lightning Form (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Lightning Form (Blue) that play both.
Lightning Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Lightning Form (Red) that play both.
Lightning Form (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Lightning Form (Yellow) that play both.
Splintering Deadwood (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Splintering Deadwood (Blue) that play both.
Splintering Deadwood (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Splintering Deadwood (Red) that play both.
Splintering Deadwood (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Splintering Deadwood (Yellow) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Summer's Fall (Yellow) that play both.
Tongue Tied
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Tongue Tied that play both.
Vantage Point (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Vantage Point (Blue) that play both.
Vantage Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Vantage Point (Red) that play both.
Vantage Point (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Vantage Point (Yellow) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pulping (Yellow) that play both.
Humble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.444444444
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Humble (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β
2.202.200000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Shake Down that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.461538462
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
V of the Vanguard
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and V of the Vanguard that play both.
Death Touch (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Death Touch (Yellow) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Banneret of Courage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Banneret of Courage that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Already Dead that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β
2.542.541666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Amnesia that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Reincarnate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Reincarnate (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.062.062500000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Beaming Bravado (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Beaming Bravado (Yellow) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Pack Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pack Call (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Clash of Might (Yellow) that play both.
Take Flight (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Take Flight (Yellow) that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Bolt of Courage (Yellow) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Companion of the Claw (Red) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Censor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Censor that play both.
Banneret of Gallantry
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Banneret of Gallantry that play both.
Bolting Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Bolting Blade that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Skull Crack that play both.
Savage Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Savage Swing (Blue) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Cut Down to Size (Yellow) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.533333333
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Beacon of Victory
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Beacon of Victory that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.565217391
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Maul
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Maul that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Just a Nick that play both.
Lumina Lance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Lumina Lance that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555555556
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Rootbound Carapace (Blue) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Soul Shield
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Soul Shield that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Sanctuary
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sigil of Sanctuary that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Yellow) that play both.
Cloud Cover
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Cloud Cover that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Blue) that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Pass Over that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Stir the Pot that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
No Fear
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and No Fear that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.478260870
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Resource
Light of Sol
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Yellow) and Light of Sol that play both.