Lead with Heart (Blue)
Warrior,guardian Action
Your next Guardian or Warrior attack this turn gets +1{p}.
Create a Vigor token.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.272.269108021
Average Defense Value: Β
2.532.534398716
Hero
Jarl VetreiΔi
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Terra
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Terra that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Betsy
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Betsy that play both.
Olympia
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Olympia that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Refraction Bolters
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Prized Galea
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Prized Galea that play both.
Nullrune Boots
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Nullrune Hood
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gallantry Gold
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Vigor Girth
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Civic Steps
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Civic Steps that play both.
Tectonic Plating
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Stand Ground
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Stand Ground that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Crown of Providence
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Ironsong Versus
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Flat Trackers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Beckon Applause
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Deep Blue
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Crater Fist
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Crater Fist that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Ironhide Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Weapon
Decimator Great Axe
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Summit, the Unforgiving
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Anothos
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Redwood Hammer
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Merciless Battleaxe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Merciless Battleaxe that play both.
Hot Streak
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hatchet of Body
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Action
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
2.652.651162791
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.450000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.498876404
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.501154734
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.503856041
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.632.629139073
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Double Down that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.483483483
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.492.494082840
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.512658228
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.445344130
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.398190045
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.682.682539683
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
2.622.621212121
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Spill Blood that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
2.452.454954955
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.662.657142857
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.394117647
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played: Β
2.582.577142857
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Cleave that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.492385787
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Lead with Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.470899471
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Lead with Power (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.436046512
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Lead with Heart (Yellow) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Unsheathed that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.533742331
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Sharpen Steel (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.421428571
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.465277778
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.466666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Nature's Path Pilgrimage (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Nature's Path Pilgrimage (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.557377049
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Big Bop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Big Bop (Blue) that play both.
Nature's Path Pilgrimage (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Nature's Path Pilgrimage (Blue) that play both.
Felling Swing (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Felling Swing (Yellow) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
2.512.513513514
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Strong Yield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Strong Yield (Red) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Buckle that play both.
Attack Action
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.782.782608696
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.495238095
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.451923077
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.570621469
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Bet Big that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.412587413
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.433070866
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Vigorous Windup (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.492753623
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Attack Reaction
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.672.665625000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Up the Ante that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.373949580
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.565656566
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.423728814
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.355263158
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.622377622
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.432835821
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Stroke of Foresight (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.511049724
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.432.432203390
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.595890411
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β
2.512.505952381
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Slap-Happy that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.