Fact-Finding Mission (Red)
Generic Action
When this hits a hero, you may look at a face-down card in their arsenal or equipment zones.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.163.157308979
Average Defense Value: Β
2.492.492503433
Hero
Uzuri
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Nuu
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nuu that play both.
Arakni
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Arakni that play both.
Zen
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Zen that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Hood
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Danger Digits
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Leap Frog Slime Skin
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Leap Frog Slime Skin that play both.
Starting Point
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Robe
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Toxic Tips
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Leap Frog Gloves
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Leap Frog Gloves that play both.
Leap Frog Vocal Sac
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Leap Frog Vocal Sac that play both.
Bunker Beard
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bunker Beard that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Blossom of Spring
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Traverse the Universe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Arousing Wave
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Ironrot Legs
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Mask of Wizened Whiskers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mask of Wizened Whiskers that play both.
Skybody Keikoi
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Skybody Keikoi that play both.
Arcane Lantern
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Flick Knives
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Mask of Perdition
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Deep Blue
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Seeker's Leggings
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Seeker's Leggings that play both.
Redback Shroud
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Raw Meat
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Raw Meat that play both.
Flat Trackers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Waves of Aqua Marine
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Waves of Aqua Marine that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Fisticuffs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fisticuffs that play both.
Fleet Foot Sandals
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fleet Foot Sandals that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Tiger Taming Khakkara
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Scale Peeler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Mandible Claw
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Action
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.642.642857143
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Scout the Periphery (Red) that play both.
Gravekeeping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Gravekeeping (Red) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.941.941176471
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Fact-Finding Mission (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fact-Finding Mission (Blue) that play both.
Emissary of Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Emissary of Moon that play both.
Untamed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Untamed (Red) that play both.
Force Sight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Force Sight (Red) that play both.
Pick a Card, Any Card (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pick a Card, Any Card (Yellow) that play both.
Fact-Finding Mission (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fact-Finding Mission (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.182.181818182
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Wounding Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wounding Blow (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β
1.801.800000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Grow Wings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Grow Wings (Blue) that play both.
Silver Talons (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Silver Talons (Blue) that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Mark the Prey (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mark the Prey (Blue) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Blue) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Reaper's Call (Red) that play both.
Scuttle the Canal (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Scuttle the Canal (Blue) that play both.
Scuttle the Canal (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Scuttle the Canal (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Brutal Assault (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Brutal Assault (Red) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Frontline Scout (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Frontline Scout (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Brothers in Arms (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Malign (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Malign (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Surging Militia (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Surging Militia (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fleece the Frail (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mind's Desire (Blue) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Rally the Rearguard (Red) that play both.
Freewheeling Renegades (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Freewheeling Renegades (Red) that play both.
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nix the Nimble (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Defense Reaction
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.302.300000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.315789474
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Evasive Leap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.401.400000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Evasive Leap (Red) that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Calming Breeze that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Seduce Secrets
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Seduce Secrets that play both.