Fact-Finding Mission (Red)
Generic Action
When this hits a hero, you may look at a face-down card in their arsenal or equipment zones.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.133.130922379
Average Defense Value: Β
2.492.490320547
Hero
Uzuri
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Nuu
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nuu that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Squizzy & Floof
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Squizzy & Floof that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Hood
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Robe
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Arousing Wave
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Traverse the Universe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Toxic Tips
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Skybody Keikoi
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Skybody Keikoi that play both.
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Ironhide Legs
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Deep Blue
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Seeker's Leggings
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Seeker's Leggings that play both.
Raw Meat
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Raw Meat that play both.
Redback Shroud
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Mask of Wizened Whiskers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mask of Wizened Whiskers that play both.
Waves of Aqua Marine
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Waves of Aqua Marine that play both.
Aqua Laps
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Aqua Laps that play both.
Breaking Scales
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Flick Knives
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Fisticuffs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fisticuffs that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Tiger Taming Khakkara
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Mandible Claw
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Action
Gravekeeping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Gravekeeping (Red) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.082.076923077
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.072.071428571
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Emissary of Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Emissary of Moon that play both.
Plan for the Worst
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Plan for the Worst that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Call to the Grave that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Fact-Finding Mission (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fact-Finding Mission (Blue) that play both.
Fact-Finding Mission (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fact-Finding Mission (Yellow) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Emissary of Wind
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Emissary of Wind that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Untamed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Untamed (Red) that play both.
First Tenet of Chi: Moon
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and First Tenet of Chi: Moon that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Vengeful Apparition (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Vengeful Apparition (Blue) that play both.
Force Sight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Force Sight (Red) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
First Tenet of Chi: Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and First Tenet of Chi: Wind that play both.
Attack Action
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β
1.801.800000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Wounding Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.331.333333333
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wounding Blow (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Brutal Assault (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Brutal Assault (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Malign (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Malign (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Tongue Tied
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tongue Tied that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Brothers in Arms (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Frontline Scout (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Frontline Scout (Red) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mind's Desire (Blue) that play both.
Surging Militia (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Surging Militia (Red) that play both.
Freewheeling Renegades (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Freewheeling Renegades (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Down But Not Out (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Down But Not Out (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Droplet
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Droplet that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Tidal Surge
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tidal Surge that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Yellow) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Frontline Scout (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Frontline Scout (Blue) that play both.
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nix the Nimble (Red) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Maul
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Maul that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Venomous Bite (Blue) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.242.235294118
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.266666667
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Evasive Leap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Evasive Leap (Red) that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Waxing Specter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Waxing Specter (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Yellow) that play both.