Fact-Finding Mission (Red)
Generic Action
When this hits a hero, you may look at a face-down card in their arsenal or equipment zones.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.063.061659976
Average Defense Value: Β
2.552.547505229
Hero
Uzuri
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Nuu
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nuu that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Zen
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Zen that play both.
Enigma
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Enigma that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Gloves
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Arousing Wave
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Traverse the Universe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Skybody Keikoi
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Skybody Keikoi that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Mask of Wizened Whiskers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mask of Wizened Whiskers that play both.
Waves of Aqua Marine
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Waves of Aqua Marine that play both.
Aqua Laps
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Aqua Laps that play both.
Fisticuffs
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fisticuffs that play both.
Toxic Tips
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Skywalker Keikoi
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Skywalker Keikoi that play both.
Arcane Lantern
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Breaking Scales
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Breaking Scales that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Heirloom of Snake Hide
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Heirloom of Snake Hide that play both.
Skycrest Keikoi
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Skycrest Keikoi that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Fleet Foot Sandals
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fleet Foot Sandals that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Tiger Taming Khakkara
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Scale Peeler
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Mandible Claw
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Action
Gravekeeping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Gravekeeping (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.082.083333333
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Emissary of Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Emissary of Moon that play both.
Emissary of Wind
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Emissary of Wind that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Untamed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Untamed (Red) that play both.
First Tenet of Chi: Moon
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and First Tenet of Chi: Moon that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Vengeful Apparition (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Vengeful Apparition (Blue) that play both.
First Tenet of Chi: Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and First Tenet of Chi: Wind that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Blessing of Qi (Red) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Wind Chakra (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wind Chakra (Red) that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
10,000 Year Reunion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and 10,000 Year Reunion that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Mind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Essence of Ancestry: Mind that play both.
Solitary Companion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Solitary Companion (Red) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
Fact-Finding Mission (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fact-Finding Mission (Yellow) that play both.
First Tenet of Chi: Tide
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and First Tenet of Chi: Tide that play both.
Gravekeeping (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Gravekeeping (Yellow) that play both.
Haunting Specter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Haunting Specter (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Solitude (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sigil of Solitude (Red) that play both.
Single Minded Determination (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Single Minded Determination (Blue) that play both.
Vengeful Apparition (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Vengeful Apparition (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solitude (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sigil of Solitude (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Solitude (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sigil of Solitude (Yellow) that play both.
Vengeful Apparition (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Vengeful Apparition (Yellow) that play both.
Nimblism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nimblism (Blue) that play both.
Water the Seeds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Water the Seeds (Red) that play both.
Emissary of Tides
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Emissary of Tides that play both.
Water the Seeds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Water the Seeds (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wounding Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.381.375000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wounding Blow (Red) that play both.
Brutal Assault (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Brutal Assault (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Malign (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Malign (Blue) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mind's Desire (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.671.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Brothers in Arms (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Droplet
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Droplet that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Tidal Surge
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tidal Surge that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Surging Militia (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Surging Militia (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Yellow) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Freewheeling Renegades (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Freewheeling Renegades (Red) that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Chase the Tail that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Down But Not Out (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Down But Not Out (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Qi Unleashed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Qi Unleashed (Red) that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Companion of the Claw (Red) that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Deep Blue Sea
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Deep Blue Sea that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Mauling Qi that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Spillover
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Spillover that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Impulsive Desire (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Impulsive Desire (Red) that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Tide
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Second Tenet of Chi: Tide that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Attack Reaction
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Maul
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Maul that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.601.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Venomous Bite (Blue) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.401.400000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Wide Blue Yonder
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wide Blue Yonder that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Intimate Inducement (Blue) that play both.
Tide Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Tide Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Venomous Bite (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Intimate Inducement (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.082.083333333
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.363636364
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Evasive Leap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Evasive Leap (Red) that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Unravel Aggression
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Unravel Aggression that play both.
Wash Away
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Wash Away that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Waxing Specter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Waxing Specter (Blue) that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Dense Blue Mist
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Dense Blue Mist that play both.
Haze Shelter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Haze Shelter (Red) that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Moon Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Moon Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Moon Chakra (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Moon Chakra (Red) that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Waning Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
Waxing Specter (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Waxing Specter (Yellow) that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fact-Finding Mission (Red) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.