Hack to Reality
Generic Action
Your next attack this turn gets +2{p}.
The next time you hit a hero this turn, destroy a non-token aura they own with cost less than or equal to the damage dealt this way.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.622.620000503
Average Defense Value: Β
2.642.640873433
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Aurora, Shooting Star
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Boots
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Balance of Justice that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Refraction Bolters
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Ironsong Versus
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Civic Steps
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Civic Steps that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Face Purgatory
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Face Purgatory that play both.
Longdraw Half-Glove
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Longdraw Half-Glove that play both.
Tectonic Plating
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Arcane Lantern
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crater Fist
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Crater Fist that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Crown of Dominion
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Calming Gesture
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Calming Gesture that play both.
Well Grounded
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Well Grounded that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Flight Path
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Flight Path that play both.
Sharp Shooters
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sharp Shooters that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Perch Grapplers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Ironrot Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Soulbond Resolve
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Soulbond Resolve that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Prized Galea
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Prized Galea that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Time Skippers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Time Skippers that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Anothos that play both.
Dawnblade
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Dawnblade that play both.
Hot Streak
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Hot Streak that play both.
Titan's Fist
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Titan's Fist that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Star Fall
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Star Fall that play both.
Raydn, Duskbane
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Raydn, Duskbane that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Unsheathed that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Spoils of War that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Tear Asunder that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Germinate that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Arc Lightning that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Condemn to Slaughter (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Emboldened Blade that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and The Weakest Link that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Premeditate that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Commanding Performance that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Show Time! that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Spirit of Eirina
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Spirit of Eirina that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Truce that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Flourish that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Condemn to Slaughter (Blue) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and This Round's on Me that play both.
Lumina Ascension
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Lumina Ascension that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Passing Mirage that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.832.825726141
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β
2.692.692307692
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Plow Under that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Spinal Crush that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Current Funnel that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Crippling Crush that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Star Struck that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Stone Rain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Stone Rain that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
V of the Vanguard
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and V of the Vanguard that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ripple Away that play both.
Banneret of Courage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Banneret of Courage that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Bolt'n' Shot (Red) that play both.
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Banneret of Gallantry
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Banneret of Gallantry that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Blade Flurry that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.635416667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Rout that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Run Through that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Up the Ante that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Twinning Blade that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Beacon of Victory
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Beacon of Victory that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.811912226
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746835443
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Soul Shield
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Soul Shield that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Saving Grace that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
2.572.567567568
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and That All You Got? that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.514705882
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Pass Over that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Stir the Pot that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Remembrance that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Art of War that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Heart of Fyendal that play both.