Hack to Reality
Generic Action
Your next attack this turn gets +2{p}.
The next time you hit a hero this turn, destroy a non-token aura they own with cost less than or equal to the damage dealt this way.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.482.479143701
Average Defense Value: Β
2.642.640417050
Hero
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
300% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Equipment
Base of the Mountain
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Crown of Providence that play both.
Iris of the Blossom
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Iris of the Blossom that play both.
Nullrune Boots
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Hood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Balance of Justice
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Balance of Justice that play both.
Refraction Bolters
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Ironsong Versus
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Sealace Sarong
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Arcane Lantern
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Civic Steps
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Civic Steps that play both.
Tectonic Plating
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crater Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Crater Fist that play both.
Crown of Dominion
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Longdraw Half-Glove
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Longdraw Half-Glove that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Mask of Deceit
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Flick Knives
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Flick Knives that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Perch Grapplers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Soulbond Resolve
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Soulbond Resolve that play both.
Sharp Shooters
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sharp Shooters that play both.
Nullrune Robe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Weapon
Dawnblade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Dawnblade that play both.
Anothos
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Anothos that play both.
Hot Streak
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Hot Streak that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Titan's Fist
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Titan's Fist that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Cintari Saber
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Cintari Saber that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Unsheathed that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Trot Along that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Opal Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Opal Amulet that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Spoils of War that play both.
Platinum Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Platinum Amulet that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Kiss of Death that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Tear Asunder that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Riddle with Regret
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Riddle with Regret that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Midas Touch that play both.
Pearl Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Pearl Amulet that play both.
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Amethyst Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Amethyst Amulet that play both.
Onyx Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Onyx Amulet that play both.
Pounamu Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Pounamu Amulet that play both.
Sapphire Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sapphire Amulet that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Premeditate that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and This Round's on Me that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Show Time! that play both.
Spirit of Eirina
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Spirit of Eirina that play both.
Lumina Ascension
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Lumina Ascension that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and The Weakest Link that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Commanding Performance that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Dual Threat that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Call for Backup
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Call for Backup that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Bittering Thorns (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.802.802816901
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Spinal Crush that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Cranial Crush that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Deny Redemption
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Deny Redemption that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sea Legs that play both.
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Swift Shot that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Crippling Crush that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Star Struck that play both.
Display Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Display Loyalty that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
V of the Vanguard
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and V of the Vanguard that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Bolt'n' Shot (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Banneret of Courage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Banneret of Courage that play both.
Attack Reaction
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Provoke that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.812.812500000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Jagged Edge that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Blade Flurry that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.634615385
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555555556
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Rout that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Run Through that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Twinning Blade that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Throw Dagger that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Just a Nick that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Beacon of Victory
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Beacon of Victory that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Up the Ante that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.821808511
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555555556
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.752.754285714
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Soul Shield
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Soul Shield that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
2.592.590000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and That All You Got? that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Saving Grace that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.751.750000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.520000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Remembrance that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Take it on the Chin that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Pass Over that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hack to Reality and Heart of Fyendal that play both.