Consuming Aftermath (Blue)
Shadow Generic Attack Action - Attack
As an additional cost to play Consuming Aftermath, you may banish a card from your hand. If a Shadow card is banished this way, Consuming Aftermath gains dominate. (The defending hero can't defend Consuming Aftermath with more than 1 card from their hand.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.113.113884671
Average Defense Value:
2.332.325179579
Hero
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Levia, Shadowborn Abomination that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Chane that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Chane, Bound by Shadow
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Chane, Bound by Shadow that play both.
Levia
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Levia that play both.
Equipment
Ebon Fold
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Dance of Darkness
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Aether Ironweave
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Hooves of the Shadowbeast that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Cloak of Darkness
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Cloak of Darkness that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Shroud of Darkness
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shroud of Darkness that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Nullrune Boots
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Carrion Husk
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Carrion Husk that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Crown of Providence
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Nullrune Robe
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Deep Blue
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Blood Drop Brocade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Blood Drop Brocade that play both.
Quelling Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Quelling Robe that play both.
Quelling Sleeves
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Quelling Sleeves that play both.
Cracker Jax
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Cracker Jax that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Ironhide Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Ironhide Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Stubby Hammerers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Stubby Hammerers that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Hell Hammer
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Hell Hammer that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Galaxxi Black
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Galaxxi Black that play both.
Flail of Agony
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Flail of Agony that play both.
Scepter of Pain
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Hexagore, the Death Hydra
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Hexagore, the Death Hydra that play both.
Rok
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rok that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Romping Club
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Romping Club that play both.
Mandible Claw
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Dread Scythe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Dread Scythe that play both.
Action
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
1.751.750000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tear Through the Portal (Yellow) that play both.
Vile Inquisition (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Vile Inquisition (Yellow) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Red)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tear Through the Portal (Red) that play both.
Tome of Torment
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tome of Torment that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.201.200000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Yellow) that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:
1.751.750000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
Minnowism (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Minnowism (Yellow) that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
1.711.714285714
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Howl from Beyond (Blue) that play both.
Spew Shadow (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.251.250000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Spew Shadow (Blue) that play both.
Spew Shadow (Red)
Avg. played:
1.401.400000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Spew Shadow (Red) that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.172.166666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Unworldly Bellow (Red) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Beseech the Demigon (Blue) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Beseech the Demigon (Yellow) that play both.
Chains of Mephetis
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Chains of Mephetis that play both.
Grim Feast (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Grim Feast (Blue) that play both.
Grim Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Grim Feast (Red) that play both.
Grim Feast (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Grim Feast (Yellow) that play both.
Shaden Scream (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shaden Scream (Blue) that play both.
Shaden Scream (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shaden Scream (Red) that play both.
Shaden Scream (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shaden Scream (Yellow) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tear Through the Portal (Blue) that play both.
Vile Inquisition (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Vile Inquisition (Blue) that play both.
Vile Inquisition (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Vile Inquisition (Red) that play both.
Dimenxxional Vortex
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Dimenxxional Vortex that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Blessing of Savagery (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Blessing of Savagery (Red) that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue) that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Howl from Beyond (Yellow) that play both.
Spew Shadow (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.331.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Spew Shadow (Yellow) that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.751.750000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Unworldly Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Unworldly Bellow (Yellow) that play both.
Dimenxxional Gateway (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Dimenxxional Gateway (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Rumble Grunting (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rumble Grunting (Blue) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Red)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Seeds of Agony (Red) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Seeds of Agony (Yellow) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Seeds of Agony (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Yellow) that play both.
Diabolic Ultimatum
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Diabolic Ultimatum that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Looming Doom that play both.
Seeping Shadows (Red)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Seeping Shadows (Red) that play both.
Talisman of Dousing
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Talisman of Dousing that play both.
Sift (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Sift (Red) that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Talisman of Featherfoot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Talisman of Featherfoot that play both.
Sting of Sorcery
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Sting of Sorcery that play both.
Minnowism (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Minnowism (Blue) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Plunder Run (Blue) that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Red) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Oath of the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Energy Potion that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Dimenxxional Crossroads
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Dimenxxional Crossroads that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Runeblood Barrier
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Runeblood Barrier that play both.
Seeping Shadows (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Seeping Shadows (Blue) that play both.
Seeping Shadows (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Seeping Shadows (Yellow) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Tome of the Arknight
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tome of the Arknight that play both.
Warmonger's Recital (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Warmonger's Recital (Red) that play both.
Dimenxxional Gateway (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Dimenxxional Gateway (Blue) that play both.
Primeval Bellow (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Primeval Bellow (Red) that play both.
Crazy Brew
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Crazy Brew that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Captain's Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Captain's Call (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Recital (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Warmonger's Recital (Blue) that play both.
Captain's Call (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Captain's Call (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Recital (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Warmonger's Recital (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Ram Raider (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ram Raider (Red) that play both.
Shaden Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shaden Swing (Red) that play both.
Soul Harvest
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Soul Harvest that play both.
Battlefield Breaker (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Battlefield Breaker (Yellow) that play both.
Shaden Death Hydra
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shaden Death Hydra that play both.
Tribute to the Legions of Doom (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tribute to the Legions of Doom (Red) that play both.
Battlefield Breaker (Red)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Battlefield Breaker (Red) that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Consuming Aftermath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Consuming Aftermath (Yellow) that play both.
Lunartide Plunderer (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Lunartide Plunderer (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deadwood Rumbler (Blue) that play both.
Consuming Aftermath (Red)
Avg. played:
1.801.800000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Consuming Aftermath (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Soul Reaping
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Soul Reaping that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Avg. played:
2.142.142857143
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Boneyard Marauder (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deadwood Rumbler (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deadwood Rumbler (Yellow) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.285714286
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Dread Screamer (Red) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.251.250000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ghostly Visit (Yellow) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Graveling Growl (Red) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow) that play both.
Mutated Mass
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Mutated Mass that play both.
Void Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.751.750000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Void Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Writhing Beast Hulk (Red)
Avg. played:
1.401.400000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Writhing Beast Hulk (Red) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rip Through Reality (Red) that play both.
Shadow of Ursur
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shadow of Ursur that play both.
Deep Rooted Evil
Avg. played:
1.601.600000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deep Rooted Evil that play both.
Battlefield Breaker (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Battlefield Breaker (Blue) that play both.
Hungering Demigon (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Hungering Demigon (Blue) that play both.
Hungering Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Hungering Demigon (Red) that play both.
Hungering Demigon (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Hungering Demigon (Yellow) that play both.
Ram Raider (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ram Raider (Blue) that play both.
Ram Raider (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ram Raider (Yellow) that play both.
Shaden Swing (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shaden Swing (Blue) that play both.
Shaden Swing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shaden Swing (Yellow) that play both.
Soul Butcher (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Soul Butcher (Blue) that play both.
Soul Butcher (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Soul Butcher (Red) that play both.
Soul Butcher (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Soul Butcher (Yellow) that play both.
Soul Cleaver (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Soul Cleaver (Blue) that play both.
Soul Cleaver (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Soul Cleaver (Red) that play both.
Soul Cleaver (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Soul Cleaver (Yellow) that play both.
Tribute to Demolition (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tribute to Demolition (Blue) that play both.
Tribute to Demolition (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tribute to Demolition (Red) that play both.
Tribute to Demolition (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tribute to Demolition (Yellow) that play both.
Tribute to the Legions of Doom (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tribute to the Legions of Doom (Blue) that play both.
Tribute to the Legions of Doom (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tribute to the Legions of Doom (Yellow) that play both.
Wall Breaker (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Wall Breaker (Blue) that play both.
Wall Breaker (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Wall Breaker (Red) that play both.
Wall Breaker (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Wall Breaker (Yellow) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deathly Delight (Yellow) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Diabolic Offering
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Diabolic Offering that play both.
Deathly Duet (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deathly Duet (Blue) that play both.
Piercing Shadow Vise (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Piercing Shadow Vise (Blue) that play both.
Rifted Torment (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rifted Torment (Blue) that play both.
Rifted Torment (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rifted Torment (Yellow) that play both.
Unhallowed Rites (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Unhallowed Rites (Blue) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Dread Screamer (Blue) that play both.
Endless Maw (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Endless Maw (Blue) that play both.
Endless Maw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Endless Maw (Red) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
1.751.750000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.751.750000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Graveling Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Avg. played:
1.801.800000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red) that play both.
Lunartide Plunderer (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Lunartide Plunderer (Blue) that play both.
Lunartide Plunderer (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Lunartide Plunderer (Yellow) that play both.
Shadow of Blasmophet
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shadow of Blasmophet that play both.
Void Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
1.331.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Void Wraith (Red) that play both.
Void Wraith (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Void Wraith (Yellow) that play both.
Writhing Beast Hulk (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Writhing Beast Hulk (Yellow) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
1.801.800000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
1.331.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Madcap Charger (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Madcap Charger (Blue) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.331.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Arcanic Crackle (Blue) that play both.
Cryptic Crossing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Cryptic Crossing that play both.
Deathly Duet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deathly Duet (Red) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Deathly Duet (Yellow) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.331.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Bounding Demigon (Blue) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.331.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rip Through Reality (Blue) that play both.
Tremor of iArathael (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tremor of iArathael (Red) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rip Through Reality (Yellow) that play both.
Aether Slash (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Aether Slash (Yellow) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Zealous Belting (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Swing Big that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Drowning Dire (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Drowning Dire (Blue) that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Reek of Corruption (Blue) that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Reek of Corruption (Red) that play both.
Singeing Steelblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Singeing Steelblade (Blue) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Belittle (Blue) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Belittle (Yellow) that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Blue) that play both.
Piercing Shadow Vise (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Piercing Shadow Vise (Yellow) that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Boneyard Marauder (Blue) that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Boneyard Marauder (Yellow) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Dread Screamer (Yellow) that play both.
Endless Maw (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Endless Maw (Yellow) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ghostly Visit (Blue) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Graveling Growl (Blue) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Blue) that play both.
Writhing Beast Hulk (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Writhing Beast Hulk (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Piercing Shadow Vise (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Piercing Shadow Vise (Red) that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Beast Within that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Pulping (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Pulping (Blue) that play both.
Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Unhallowed Rites (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Unhallowed Rites (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Arcanic Crackle (Yellow) that play both.
Rift Bind (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rift Bind (Yellow) that play both.
Unhallowed Rites (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Unhallowed Rites (Yellow) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Meat and Greet (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Meat and Greet (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Beast
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Mark of the Beast that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Savage Swing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Savage Swing (Yellow) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Spellblade Assault (Yellow) that play both.
Rift Bind (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rift Bind (Blue) that play both.
Rifted Torment (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rifted Torment (Red) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Bounding Demigon (Yellow) that play both.
Frontline Scout (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Frontline Scout (Blue) that play both.
Barraging Big Horn (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Barraging Big Horn (Red) that play both.
Breakneck Battery (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Breakneck Battery (Red) that play both.
Massacre
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Massacre that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Pulping (Yellow) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Brandish (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Brandish (Blue) that play both.
Brutal Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Brutal Assault (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rally the Rearguard (Blue) that play both.
Seek Horizon (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Seek Horizon (Blue) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Stony Woottonhog (Blue) that play both.
Surging Militia (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Surging Militia (Blue) that play both.
Yinti Yanti (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Yinti Yanti (Blue) that play both.
Adrenaline Rush (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Adrenaline Rush (Red) that play both.
Pound for Pound (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Pound for Pound (Red) that play both.
Pound for Pound (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Pound for Pound (Yellow) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rally the Rearguard (Red) that play both.
Seek Horizon (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Seek Horizon (Red) that play both.
Smash with Big Tree (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Smash with Big Tree (Blue) that play both.
Smash with Big Tree (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Smash with Big Tree (Red) that play both.
Smash with Big Tree (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Smash with Big Tree (Yellow) that play both.
Surging Militia (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Surging Militia (Red) that play both.
Surging Militia (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Surging Militia (Yellow) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Zealous Belting (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Lunging Press
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Lunging Press that play both.
Defense Reaction
Expendable Limbs
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Expendable Limbs that play both.
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Guardian of the Shadowrealm that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Sink Below (Blue) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Springboard Somersault
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Springboard Somersault that play both.
Unmovable (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Unmovable (Yellow) that play both.
Rise Above (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Rise Above (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Blood Tribute (Red)
Avg. played:
1.881.875000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Blood Tribute (Red) that play both.
Eclipse Existence
Avg. played:
1.201.200000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Eclipse Existence that play both.
Blood Tribute (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.571.571428571
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Blood Tribute (Yellow) that play both.
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Oblivion that play both.
Blood Tribute (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Blood Tribute (Blue) that play both.
Invert Existence
Avg. played:
1.801.800000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Invert Existence that play both.
Doomsday
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Doomsday that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Art of War that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Bone Head Barrier
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Bone Head Barrier that play both.
Snag
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Snag that play both.
Memorial Ground (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Memorial Ground (Yellow) that play both.
Eclipse
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Consuming Aftermath (Blue) and Eclipse that play both.