Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.543.541569145
Average Defense Value: Β
2.452.447010781
Hero
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Uzuri
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Uzuri that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Kayo
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Kayo that play both.
Gravy Bones
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Gravy Bones that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Enigma
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Enigma that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Equipment
Compass of Sunken Depths
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Dead Threads
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Dead Threads that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Boots
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Knucklehead
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Knucklehead that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Arcane Lantern
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Toxic Tips
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Peg Leg
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Peg Leg that play both.
Quick Clicks
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Quick Clicks that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Savage Sash
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Savage Sash that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Solar Plexus
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Solar Plexus that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Flick Knives
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Flick Knives that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Flat Trackers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Blade Cuff
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blade Cuff that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Raw Meat
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Raw Meat that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Danger Digits
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Danger Digits that play both.
Starting Point
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Starting Point that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Radiant View
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant View that play both.
Radiant Touch
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant Touch that play both.
Beaten Trackers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Skullhorn
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Skullhorn that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Radiant Raiment
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant Raiment that play both.
Fleet Foot Sandals
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fleet Foot Sandals that play both.
Redback Shroud
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Ironhide Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Ironhide Helm
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Seeker's Gilet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Seeker's Gilet that play both.
Quickstep
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Quickstep that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Mandible Claw
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Scale Peeler
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Beaming Blade
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Beaming Blade that play both.
Orbitoclast
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Orbitoclast that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Action
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Avast Ye! that play both.
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Loot the Hold that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Give No Quarter
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Give No Quarter that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Riggermortis that play both.
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played: Β
1.671.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Shifting Tides that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Chowder, Hearty Cook that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Cutty Shark, Quick Clip
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cutty Shark, Quick Clip that play both.
Moray le Fay
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Moray le Fay that play both.
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scooba, Salty Sea Dog that play both.
Shelly, Hardened Traveler
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Shelly, Hardened Traveler that play both.
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Swabbie that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Loan Shark that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Call to the Grave that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Charge of the Light Brigade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Charge of the Light Brigade (Red) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Attack Action
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.369369369
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.265625000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.301587302
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.272727273
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.298245614
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.358490566
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cut Down to Size (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.652.653061224
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.576923077
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.317073171
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sea Legs that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Paddle Faster
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Paddle Faster that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β
2.202.200000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Smash Up that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Run Roughshod that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Light the Way (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Light the Way (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.580645161
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Light the Way (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Light the Way (Yellow) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Send Packing that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Malign (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.535714286
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Swing Big that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Engulfing Light (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Engulfing Light (Yellow) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Destructive Deliberation (Yellow) that play both.
Express Lightning (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Express Lightning (Yellow) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Wither (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wither (Yellow) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Freewheeling Renegades (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Freewheeling Renegades (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Beast Within that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Shake Down that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rally the Rearguard (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.420000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.480000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.425000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Provoke that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.383561644
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Put in Context
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Put in Context that play both.
Hunted or Hunter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Hunted or Hunter that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Springboard Somersault
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Springboard Somersault that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pass Over that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Stir the Pot that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.