Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.543.541495691
Average Defense Value:
2.462.462867315
Hero
Uzuri
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Uzuri that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Kayo
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Kayo that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Enigma
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Enigma that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Boltyn
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Boltyn that play both.
Equipment
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Solar Plexus
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Solar Plexus that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Nullrune Hood
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Knucklehead
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Knucklehead that play both.
Arcane Lantern
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Toxic Tips
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Flat Trackers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Savage Sash
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Savage Sash that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Flick Knives
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Flick Knives that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Raw Meat
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Raw Meat that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blade Cuff
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blade Cuff that play both.
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Radiant View
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant View that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Radiant Touch
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant Touch that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Fleet Foot Sandals
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fleet Foot Sandals that play both.
Radiant Raiment
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant Raiment that play both.
Quickstep
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Quickstep that play both.
Skullhorn
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Skullhorn that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Redback Shroud
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Radiant Flow
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant Flow that play both.
Mask of Perdition
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Ironhide Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Ironhide Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Seeker's Gilet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Seeker's Gilet that play both.
Arousing Wave
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Skywalker Keikoi
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Skywalker Keikoi that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Mandible Claw
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Scale Peeler
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Beaming Blade
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Beaming Blade that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Orbitoclast
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Unsheathed that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Charge of the Light Brigade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Charge of the Light Brigade (Red) that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Murky Water
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Murky Water that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Astral Etchings (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Astral Etchings (Red) that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Body
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Essence of Ancestry: Body that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Mind
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Essence of Ancestry: Mind that play both.
Solitary Companion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Solitary Companion (Red) that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Spectral Manifestations (Yellow) that play both.
Vengeful Apparition (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Vengeful Apparition (Blue) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.375000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.254237288
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.102.098591549
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Smash Up that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.254901961
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.302.296296296
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.212.212765957
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.712.711111111
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.262.261904762
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.362.355555556
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cut Down to Size (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
1.751.750000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.572.571428571
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.289473684
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
2.382.375000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.532.529411765
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.310344828
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Send Packing that play both.
Light the Way (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Light the Way (Red) that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Run Roughshod that play both.
Light the Way (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Light the Way (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.422.416666667
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Malign (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.576923077
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Tidal Surge
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Tidal Surge that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played:
1.801.800000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Swing Big that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Destructive Deliberation (Yellow) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Engulfing Light (Yellow) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.542.541666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wither (Yellow) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Battlefront Bastion (Blue) that play both.
Express Lightning (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Express Lightning (Yellow) that play both.
Freewheeling Renegades (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Freewheeling Renegades (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Beast Within that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Pulping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pulping (Yellow) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Shake Down that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bolt of Courage (Yellow) that play both.
Feisty Locals (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Feisty Locals (Yellow) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Humble (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Humble (Yellow) that play both.
Sedate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sedate (Yellow) that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Deep Blue Sea
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Deep Blue Sea that play both.
Droplet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Droplet that play both.
Spillover
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Spillover that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Impulsive Desire (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Just a Nick that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.472.468085106
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.511111111
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.432432432
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Saving Grace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.359375000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.322.315789474
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Springboard Somersault
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Springboard Somersault that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
Big Blue Sky
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Big Blue Sky that play both.
Unravel Aggression
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Unravel Aggression that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pass Over that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Moon Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Moon Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.