Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.523.524937113
Average Defense Value:
2.462.462576733
Hero
Uzuri
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Uzuri that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Kayo
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Kayo that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Enigma
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Enigma that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Boltyn
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Boltyn that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Danger Digits
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Danger Digits that play both.
Starting Point
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Starting Point that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Crown of Providence
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Solar Plexus
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Solar Plexus that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Arcane Lantern
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Knucklehead
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Knucklehead that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Toxic Tips
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Well Grounded
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Well Grounded that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Savage Sash
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Savage Sash that play both.
Flick Knives
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Flick Knives that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Flat Trackers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Blade Cuff
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blade Cuff that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Raw Meat
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Raw Meat that play both.
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Radiant View
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant View that play both.
Radiant Touch
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant Touch that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Radiant Raiment
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant Raiment that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Runehold Release
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Runehold Release that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Fleet Foot Sandals
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fleet Foot Sandals that play both.
Redback Shroud
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Ironhide Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Ironhide Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Seeker's Gilet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Seeker's Gilet that play both.
Quickstep
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Quickstep that play both.
Beaten Trackers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Skullhorn
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Skullhorn that play both.
Mask of Perdition
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Mandible Claw
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Scale Peeler
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Beaming Blade
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Beaming Blade that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Orbitoclast
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Rotwood Reaper
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rotwood Reaper that play both.
Action
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.632.625000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Charge of the Light Brigade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Charge of the Light Brigade (Red) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Cussing (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Cussing (Yellow) that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Condemn to Slaughter (Blue) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Unsheathed that play both.
Truce
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Truce that play both.
Plan for the Worst
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Plan for the Worst that play both.
Murky Water
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Murky Water that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Attack Action
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.380952381
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.265625000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.112.108108108
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.272727273
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.302.298245614
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.222.220000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.352.346938776
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cut Down to Size (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.590909091
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.325000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played:
1.751.750000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Smash Up that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Strength of Four Seasons (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
2.382.375000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.532.529411765
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Light the Way (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Light the Way (Red) that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Run Roughshod that play both.
Light the Way (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Light the Way (Yellow) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Send Packing that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.592592593
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Malign (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Engulfing Light (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Swing Big that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Destructive Deliberation (Yellow) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Strength of Four Seasons (Yellow) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Summer's Fall (Yellow) that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Express Lightning (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Express Lightning (Yellow) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.542.541666667
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Wither (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wither (Yellow) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Freewheeling Renegades (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Freewheeling Renegades (Red) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Shake Down that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Tidal Surge
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Tidal Surge that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Beast Within that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bolt of Courage (Yellow) that play both.
Feisty Locals (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Feisty Locals (Yellow) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rally the Rearguard (Yellow) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Battlefront Bastion (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Provoke that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.442.437500000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Just a Nick that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.421052632
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.391891892
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Put in Context
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Put in Context that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Hunted or Hunter
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Hunted or Hunter that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Springboard Somersault
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Springboard Somersault that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pass Over that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Stir the Pot that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Fertile Ground (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fertile Ground (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Yellow) that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Plague Hive that play both.