Cut Down to Size (Yellow)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.533.527940348
Average Defense Value:
2.462.460163692
Hero
Uzuri
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Uzuri that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Kayo
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Kayo that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Enigma
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Enigma that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Boltyn
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Boltyn that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Solar Plexus
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Solar Plexus that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Knucklehead
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Knucklehead that play both.
Arcane Lantern
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Toxic Tips
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Savage Sash
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Savage Sash that play both.
Flat Trackers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Flat Trackers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Flick Knives
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Flick Knives that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Raw Meat
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Raw Meat that play both.
Blade Cuff
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blade Cuff that play both.
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Radiant View
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant View that play both.
Radiant Touch
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant Touch that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Radiant Raiment
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant Raiment that play both.
Fleet Foot Sandals
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fleet Foot Sandals that play both.
Quickstep
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Quickstep that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Skullhorn
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Skullhorn that play both.
Redback Shroud
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Mask of Perdition
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Ironhide Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Ironhide Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Seeker's Gilet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Seeker's Gilet that play both.
Radiant Flow
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Radiant Flow that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Mandible Claw
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Scale Peeler
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Beaming Blade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Beaming Blade that play both.
Orbitoclast
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Unsheathed that play both.
Truce
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Truce that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Charge of the Light Brigade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Charge of the Light Brigade (Red) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Murky Water
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Murky Water that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Charge of the Light Brigade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Charge of the Light Brigade (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.373737374
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.254237288
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.112.111111111
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.269230769
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.312.309090909
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.212.212765957
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.702.702127660
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.272727273
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.332.326086957
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Cut Down to Size (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.590909091
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.289473684
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Smash Up that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
2.382.375000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.472.473684211
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.532.529411765
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Send Packing that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Run Roughshod that play both.
Light the Way (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Light the Way (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.310344828
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Light the Way (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Light the Way (Yellow) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.592592593
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Malign (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Swing Big that play both.
Engulfing Light (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Engulfing Light (Yellow) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Destructive Deliberation (Yellow) that play both.
Tidal Surge
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Tidal Surge that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Express Lightning (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Express Lightning (Yellow) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.542.541666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Wither (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Wither (Yellow) that play both.
Freewheeling Renegades (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Freewheeling Renegades (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Beast Within that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Battlefront Bastion (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bolt of Courage (Yellow) that play both.
Feisty Locals (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Feisty Locals (Yellow) that play both.
Pulping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pulping (Yellow) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Shake Down that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bolt of Courage (Red) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Engulfing Light (Red) that play both.
Express Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Express Lightning (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rally the Rearguard (Yellow) that play both.
Humble (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Humble (Yellow) that play both.
Sedate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sedate (Yellow) that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Just a Nick that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.452.446808511
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.421052632
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Saving Grace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.376811594
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.342.341463415
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Springboard Somersault
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Springboard Somersault that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Pass Over that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Yellow) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.