Seek Horizon (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
As an additional cost to play Seek Horizon, you may put a card from your hand on top of your deck. If you do, Seek Horizon gains go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.692.685858677
Average Defense Value:
2.462.461440120
Hero
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Azalea, Ace in the Hole
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Azalea, Ace in the Hole that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Dash I/O
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Dash I/O that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Azalea
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Azalea that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Equipment
Compass of Sunken Depths
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Dead Threads
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Dead Threads that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crow's Nest
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Crow's Nest that play both.
Breakwater Undertow
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Breakwater Undertow that play both.
Head Stone
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Head Stone that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Sharp Shooters
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Sharp Shooters that play both.
Skullbone Crosswrap
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Skullbone Crosswrap that play both.
Flight Path
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Flight Path that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Washed Up Wave
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Washed Up Wave that play both.
Perch Grapplers
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Crown of Providence
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Hidden Agenda
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Hidden Agenda that play both.
Longdraw Half-Glove
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Longdraw Half-Glove that play both.
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Wayfinder's Crest
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Wayfinder's Crest that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Blossom of Spring
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Bracers of Belief
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Bracers of Belief that play both.
Hornet's Sting
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Hornet's Sting that play both.
Target Totalizer
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Target Totalizer that play both.
Drive Brake
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Drive Brake that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Toxic Tips
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Threadbare Tunic
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Threadbare Tunic that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
New Horizon
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and New Horizon that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Ironsong Versus
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Talismanic Lens
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Talismanic Lens that play both.
Ironrot Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Metacarpus Node
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
Quiver of Rustling Leaves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Quiver of Rustling Leaves that play both.
Deep Blue
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Well Grounded
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Weapon
Death Dealer
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Death Dealer that play both.
Sandscour Greatbow
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Sandscour Greatbow that play both.
Barbed Castaway
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Barbed Castaway that play both.
Obsidian Fire Vein
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Symbiosis Shot
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Symbiosis Shot that play both.
Waning Moon
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Rosetta Thorn
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Dreadbore
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Dreadbore that play both.
Action
Portside Exchange
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Avast Ye! that play both.
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Riggermortis that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Shifting Tides that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Cutty Shark, Quick Clip
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Cutty Shark, Quick Clip that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Swabbie
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Swabbie that play both.
Nock the Deathwhistle
Avg. played:
2.662.656603774
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Nock the Deathwhistle that play both.
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Avg. played:
2.282.282776350
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Scout the Periphery (Red) that play both.
Read the Glide Path (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.575868373
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Read the Glide Path (Red) that play both.
Line It Up
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Line It Up that play both.
Seek and Destroy
Avg. played:
2.752.747500000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Seek and Destroy that play both.
Lace with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.562.560000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Lace with Bloodrot that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Dead Eye
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Dead Eye that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.415584416
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played:
2.712.707509881
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Premeditate that play both.
Take Aim (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.569405099
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Take Aim (Red) that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Call in the Big Guns (Red) that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Call in the Big Guns (Yellow) that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Loan Shark that play both.
Drop the Anchor
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Drop the Anchor that play both.
Hook
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Hook that play both.
Sinker
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Sinker that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Fletch a Red Tail
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Fletch a Red Tail that play both.
Scout the Periphery (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Scout the Periphery (Blue) that play both.
Emissary of Wind
Avg. played:
2.562.562500000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Emissary of Wind that play both.
Lace with Inertia
Avg. played:
2.542.541484716
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Lace with Inertia that play both.
Anthem of Spring
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Anthem of Spring that play both.
Release the Tension (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Release the Tension (Red) that play both.
Lace with Frailty
Avg. played:
2.552.553299492
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Lace with Frailty that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Toxicity (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Toxicity (Blue) that play both.
Dissolving Shield (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Dissolving Shield (Red) that play both.
Read the Glide Path (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.492.489583333
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Read the Glide Path (Yellow) that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Call to the Grave that play both.
Point the Tip (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Point the Tip (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Attack Action
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Gold Hunter Ketch
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Gold Hunter Ketch that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Restless Bones (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Restless Bones (Blue) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.444444444
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.362595420
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Infecting Shot (Red) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Saltwater Swell (Yellow) that play both.
Restless Bones (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Restless Bones (Red) that play both.
Judge, Jury, Executioner
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Judge, Jury, Executioner that play both.
Red in the Ledger
Avg. played:
2.672.667326733
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Red in the Ledger that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.582.579136691
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.406976744
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.669603524
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Bolt'n' Shot (Red) that play both.
Spire Sniping (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.342.344352617
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Spire Sniping (Blue) that play both.
Stone Rain
Avg. played:
2.722.720930233
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Stone Rain that play both.
Widowmaker (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Widowmaker (Red) that play both.
Spire Sniping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Spire Sniping (Red) that play both.
Drill Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.605839416
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Drill Shot (Red) that play both.
Remorseless
Avg. played:
2.702.696275072
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Remorseless that play both.
Withering Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Withering Shot (Red) that play both.
Sedation Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Sedation Shot (Red) that play both.
Falcon Wing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.282.283582090
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Falcon Wing (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.432432432
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Murkmire Grapnel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.342629482
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Murkmire Grapnel (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Swift Shot
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Swift Shot that play both.
Jittery Bones (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Jittery Bones (Blue) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
HMS Marlin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and HMS Marlin that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Dry Powder Shot
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Dry Powder Shot that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Spire Sniping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Spire Sniping (Yellow) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.482.477477477
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.662.661538462
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Bolt'n' Shot (Yellow) that play both.
Immobilizing Shot
Avg. played:
2.682.681818182
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Immobilizing Shot that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Bolt'n' Shot (Blue) that play both.
Heat Seeker
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Heat Seeker that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Hemorrhage Bore (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Hemorrhage Bore (Red) that play both.
Endless Arrow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Endless Arrow that play both.
Sleep Dart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.528957529
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Sleep Dart (Red) that play both.
Skybound Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Skybound Shot (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
For the Dracai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and For the Dracai that play both.
Battering Bolt
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Battering Bolt that play both.
Fatigue Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.556701031
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Fatigue Shot (Red) that play both.
Barbed Undertow
Avg. played:
2.542.543750000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Barbed Undertow that play both.
Searing Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Searing Shot (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Infecting Shot (Blue) that play both.
Falcon Wing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Falcon Wing (Blue) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Infecting Shot (Yellow) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Sedation Shot (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Sedation Shot (Blue) that play both.
Salvage Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Salvage Shot (Red) that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played:
2.502.496503497
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Sedation Shot (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Sedation Shot (Yellow) that play both.
Wounding Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Wounding Blow (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
March of Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and March of Loyalty that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.375000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Scalding Iron
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Scalding Iron that play both.
Searing Gaze
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Searing Gaze that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Incision (Blue) that play both.
Perforate
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Perforate that play both.
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Sisters of Fire that play both.
Defense Reaction
Blood in the Water
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Blood in the Water that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.562.560810811
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.505133470
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.562.555555556
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Chain Reaction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Chain Reaction that play both.
Take Cover (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Take Cover (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Block
Return Fire
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Return Fire that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Rain Razors
Avg. played:
2.682.677551020
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Rain Razors that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Memorial Ground (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.462.464912281
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Memorial Ground (Yellow) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Slap-Happy that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seek Horizon (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.