banner
Feisty Locals (Red)
349 decks (0.07106%)
Price History
Feisty Locals (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
If this is defended by an action card, this has +2{p}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.562.561539664
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.352.351003174
Hero
Aurora
Aurora
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Aurora that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Benji, the Piercing Wind
Benji, the Piercing Wind
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Briar
Briar
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Briar that play both.
Aurora, Shooting Star
Aurora, Shooting Star
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Verdance
Verdance
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Verdance that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
Helm of Lignum Vitae
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Aether Ironweave
Aether Ironweave
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Silken Gi
Silken Gi
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Silken Gi that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
Dyadic Carapace
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Bracers of Belief
Bracers of Belief
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Bracers of Belief that play both.
Fleet Foot Sandals
Fleet Foot Sandals
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Fleet Foot Sandals that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
Hope Merchant's Hood
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Bloodied Oval
Bloodied Oval
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Fisticuffs
Fisticuffs
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Fisticuffs that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
Grasp of the Arknight
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
Crown of Dichotomy
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
Bloodtorn Bodice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
Flash of Brilliance
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Deep Blue
Deep Blue
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Aether Crackers
Aether Crackers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Aether Crackers that play both.
Mask of Many Faces
Mask of Many Faces
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Mask of Many Faces that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
Vest of the First Fist
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
Spellbound Creepers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
Vexing Quillhand
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
Mask of Three Tails
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Breaking Scales
Breaking Scales
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Parry Blade
Parry Blade
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Parry Blade that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Ironrot Helm
Ironrot Helm
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Weapon
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
Staff of Verdant Shoots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
Rosetta Thorn
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Star Fall
Star Fall
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
Talishar, the Lost Prince
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Action
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Sizzle (Red)
Sizzle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.750000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Sizzle (Red) that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Emissary of Tides
Emissary of Tides
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.250000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Emissary of Tides that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Anthem of Spring
Anthem of Spring
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Anthem of Spring that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Emissary of Moon
Emissary of Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.881.875000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Emissary of Moon that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Emissary of Wind
Emissary of Wind
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Emissary of Wind that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Germinate
Germinate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Germinate that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Strong Yield (Red)
Strong Yield (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Strong Yield (Red) that play both.
Arc Lightning
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Sigil of the Arknight
Sigil of the Arknight
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Sigil of the Arknight that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Sigil of Fyendal
Sigil of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Sigil of Fyendal that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Swell Tidings that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Minnowism (Blue)
Minnowism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Minnowism (Blue) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Gravekeeping (Red)
Gravekeeping (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Gravekeeping (Red) that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Premeditate
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Premeditate that play both.
Attack Action
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.172.174157303
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.122.123456790
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Overload (Red)
Overload (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Overload (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.246575342
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Smash Up
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Photon Rush (Red)
Photon Rush (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Photon Rush (Red) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Fry (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Red)
Belittle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Belittle (Red) that play both.
Spring Load (Red)
Spring Load (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Spring Load (Red) that play both.
Head Jab (Blue)
Head Jab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Head Jab (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
One-Two Punch (Blue)
One-Two Punch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and One-Two Punch (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Blue)
Be Like Water (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Be Like Water (Blue) that play both.
Head Jab (Red)
Head Jab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Head Jab (Red) that play both.
Head Jab (Yellow)
Head Jab (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Head Jab (Yellow) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Yellow)
Be Like Water (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Be Like Water (Yellow) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
One-Two Punch (Yellow)
One-Two Punch (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and One-Two Punch (Yellow) that play both.
Twin Twisters (Yellow)
Twin Twisters (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Twin Twisters (Yellow) that play both.
Back Heel Kick (Red)
Back Heel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Back Heel Kick (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Twin Twisters (Red)
Twin Twisters (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Twin Twisters (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Recoil (Blue)
Recoil (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Recoil (Blue) that play both.
Promise of Plenty (Red)
Promise of Plenty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Promise of Plenty (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Wounding Blow (Red)
Wounding Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Wounding Blow (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Back Heel Kick (Yellow)
Back Heel Kick (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Back Heel Kick (Yellow) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Plow Under
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Hocus Pocus (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Current Funnel
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Current Funnel that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Yellow)
Strength of Four Seasons (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Strength of Four Seasons (Yellow) that play both.
Second Strike (Yellow)
Second Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Second Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Blue)
Hocus Pocus (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Hocus Pocus (Blue) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Bleed Out (Red)
Bleed Out (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Bleed Out (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Plunge (Yellow)
Plunge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Plunge (Yellow) that play both.
Photon Rush
Photon Rush
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Photon Rush that play both.
Crackling (Red)
Crackling (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Crackling (Red) that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Malign (Red)
Malign (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Freewheeling Renegades (Red)
Freewheeling Renegades (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Freewheeling Renegades (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Seek Horizon (Red)
Seek Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Seek Horizon (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Yellow)
Belittle (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Belittle (Yellow) that play both.
Snatch (Yellow)
Snatch (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Snatch (Yellow) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Intoxicating Shot
Intoxicating Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Intoxicating Shot that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Short and Sharp (Red)
Short and Sharp (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Short and Sharp (Red) that play both.
Lunging Press
Lunging Press
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Lunging Press that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Evasive Leap (Red)
Evasive Leap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Evasive Leap (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Slap-Happy that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Fertile Ground (Blue)
Fertile Ground (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Fertile Ground (Blue) that play both.
Fertile Ground (Red)
Fertile Ground (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Fertile Ground (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Yellow)
Arcane Polarity (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Yellow) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Feisty Locals (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.