banner
New
Bark Obscenities
10 decks (0.001376%)
Price History
Bark Obscenities
Brute Action
Your next attack that targets a Guardian hero this turn gets +4{p}. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.533.530782049
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.322.324088160
Hero
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Kayo, Berserker Runt
Kayo, Berserker Runt
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Kayo, Berserker Runt that play both.
Equipment
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Savage Sash that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Skullhorn that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
Gambler's Gloves
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
Hope Merchant's Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Monstrous Veil
Monstrous Veil
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Monstrous Veil that play both.
Knucklehead
Knucklehead
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Knucklehead that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
New
Garland of Spring
Garland of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Garland of Spring that play both.
New
Horns of the Despised
Horns of the Despised
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Horns of the Despised that play both.
New
Laughing Knee-Slappers
Laughing Knee-Slappers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Laughing Knee-Slappers that play both.
New
Punching Gloves
Punching Gloves
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Punching Gloves that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
Barkbone Strapping
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Deep Blue
Deep Blue
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Deep Blue that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
Gauntlet of Might
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Ironrot Helm
Ironrot Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Nullrune Boots that play both.
New
Overbearing Presence
Overbearing Presence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Overbearing Presence that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Beaten Trackers
Beaten Trackers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Hide Tanner
Hide Tanner
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Hide Tanner that play both.
New
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
New
Helm of the Adored
Helm of the Adored
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Helm of the Adored that play both.
New
Tough Leather Boots
Tough Leather Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Tough Leather Boots that play both.
Weapon
Rok
Rok
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Rok that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
Romping Club
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Romping Club that play both.
Rugged Roller
Rugged Roller
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Rugged Roller that play both.
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Mandible Claw that play both.
Action
Smashback Alehorn
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
New
Vigorous Roar
Vigorous Roar
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Vigorous Roar that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.250000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Crazy Brew
Crazy Brew
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Crazy Brew that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.750000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Argh... Smash! that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Hack to Reality
Hack to Reality
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Hack to Reality that play both.
Bad Beats (Red)
Bad Beats (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Bad Beats (Red) that play both.
Lead with Power (Blue)
Lead with Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Lead with Power (Blue) that play both.
Ready to Roll
Ready to Roll
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Ready to Roll that play both.
Reckless Charge
Reckless Charge
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Reckless Charge that play both.
New
Beat the Same Drum
Beat the Same Drum
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Beat the Same Drum that play both.
Burdens of the Past
Burdens of the Past
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Burdens of the Past that play both.
Call to the Grave
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Call to the Grave that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
New
Booze!
Booze!
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Booze! that play both.
New
Cheap Shot
Cheap Shot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Cheap Shot that play both.
New
Revolting Gesture
Revolting Gesture
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Revolting Gesture that play both.
New
Sadistic Scowl
Sadistic Scowl
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Sadistic Scowl that play both.
New
Villainous Pose (Red)
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow) that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Energy Potion that play both.
Potion of Strength
Potion of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Potion of Strength that play both.
Sloggism (Blue)
Sloggism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Sloggism (Blue) that play both.
Captain's Call (Red)
Captain's Call (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Captain's Call (Red) that play both.
Chains of Eminence
Chains of Eminence
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Chains of Eminence that play both.
High Roller (Red)
High Roller (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and High Roller (Red) that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Red)
Sift (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Sift (Red) that play both.
Sift (Yellow)
Sift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Sift (Yellow) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Red)
Whisper of the Oracle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Whisper of the Oracle (Red) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Yellow)
Whisper of the Oracle (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Whisper of the Oracle (Yellow) that play both.
Awakening Bellow (Blue)
Awakening Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Awakening Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Awakening Bellow (Red)
Awakening Bellow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Awakening Bellow (Red) that play both.
Awakening Bellow (Yellow)
Awakening Bellow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Awakening Bellow (Yellow) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Come to Fight (Blue)
Come to Fight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Come to Fight (Blue) that play both.
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Dual Threat that play both.
Public Bounty (Red)
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Attack Action
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Show No Mercy
Show No Mercy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Show No Mercy that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Savage Beatdown
Savage Beatdown
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Savage Beatdown that play both.
New
Show of Strength
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Show of Strength that play both.
New
Familiar Stench
Familiar Stench
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Familiar Stench that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Strongest Survive (Yellow) that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Nasty Surprise that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Vigorous Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Yellow)
Wrecker Romp (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Wrecker Romp (Yellow) that play both.
Alpha Rampage
Alpha Rampage
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Alpha Rampage that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Massacre
Massacre
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Massacre that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Skull Crack
Skull Crack
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Skull Crack that play both.
Smashing Performance
Smashing Performance
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Smashing Performance that play both.
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Swing Big that play both.
Beast Within
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Beast Within that play both.
Smash with Big Tree (Red)
Smash with Big Tree (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Smash with Big Tree (Red) that play both.
Splatter Skull
Splatter Skull
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Splatter Skull that play both.
New
Cutting Retort
Cutting Retort
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Cutting Retort that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Flock of the Feather Walkers (Blue)
Flock of the Feather Walkers (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Flock of the Feather Walkers (Blue) that play both.
Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red)
Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red) that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Give and Take that play both.
Infectious Host (Red)
Infectious Host (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Infectious Host (Red) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
New
Right Behind You (Blue)
Right Behind You (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Right Behind You (Blue) that play both.
Savage Swing (Red)
Savage Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Savage Swing (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Standing Order that play both.
New
Clench the Upper Hand (Blue)
Clench the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Clench the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
New
Clench the Upper Hand (Red)
Clench the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Clench the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Feisty Locals (Blue)
Feisty Locals (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Feisty Locals (Blue) that play both.
New
Flex Speed (Blue)
Flex Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Flex Speed (Blue) that play both.
New
Flex Speed (Red)
Flex Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Flex Speed (Red) that play both.
New
Flex Strength (Blue)
Flex Strength (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Flex Strength (Blue) that play both.
New
Flex Strength (Red)
Flex Strength (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Flex Strength (Red) that play both.
New
Flex Strength (Yellow)
Flex Strength (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Flex Strength (Yellow) that play both.
New
Instill Fear (Blue)
Instill Fear (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Instill Fear (Blue) that play both.
New
Low Blow
Low Blow
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Low Blow that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Red)
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
New
Offensive Behavior
Offensive Behavior
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Offensive Behavior that play both.
New
Take That! (Blue)
Take That! (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Take That! (Blue) that play both.
New
Take That! (Yellow)
Take That! (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Take That! (Yellow) that play both.
New
Turn the Crowd Hateful (Blue)
Turn the Crowd Hateful (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Turn the Crowd Hateful (Blue) that play both.
New
Unexpected Backhand (Blue)
Unexpected Backhand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Unexpected Backhand (Blue) that play both.
New
Unexpected Backhand (Red)
Unexpected Backhand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Unexpected Backhand (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Bam Bam
Bam Bam
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Bam Bam that play both.
Demolition Crew (Red)
Demolition Crew (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Demolition Crew (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Red)
Mighty Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Mighty Windup (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Pound Town (Yellow)
Pound Town (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Pound Town (Yellow) that play both.
Regurgitating Slog (Red)
Regurgitating Slog (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Regurgitating Slog (Red) that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Back Alley Breakline (Blue) that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Red)
Back Alley Breakline (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Back Alley Breakline (Red) that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Yellow)
Back Alley Breakline (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Back Alley Breakline (Yellow) that play both.
Moon Wish (Blue)
Moon Wish (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Moon Wish (Blue) that play both.
Moon Wish (Red)
Moon Wish (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Moon Wish (Red) that play both.
Moon Wish (Yellow)
Moon Wish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Moon Wish (Yellow) that play both.
Seek Horizon (Blue)
Seek Horizon (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Seek Horizon (Blue) that play both.
Seek Horizon (Red)
Seek Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Seek Horizon (Red) that play both.
Seek Horizon (Yellow)
Seek Horizon (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Seek Horizon (Yellow) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
New
Bash Guardian
Bash Guardian
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Bash Guardian that play both.
New
Disturb the Peace
Disturb the Peace
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Disturb the Peace that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Humble (Red) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Rawhide Rumble (Red)
Rawhide Rumble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Rawhide Rumble (Red) that play both.
Savage Swing (Yellow)
Savage Swing (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Savage Swing (Yellow) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Red)
Smash Instinct (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Smash Instinct (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
New
Comeback Kid (Yellow)
Comeback Kid (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Comeback Kid (Yellow) that play both.
New
Rough Up (Red)
Rough Up (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Rough Up (Red) that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Send Packing that play both.
New
Smash with Big Rock
Smash with Big Rock
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Smash with Big Rock that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
New
Unexpected Backhand (Yellow)
Unexpected Backhand (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Unexpected Backhand (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Agility (Yellow)
Wage Agility (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Wage Agility (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Might (Yellow)
Wage Might (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Wage Might (Yellow) that play both.
New
Wind Up the Crowd
Wind Up the Crowd
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Wind Up the Crowd that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Life of the Party (Red)
Life of the Party (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Life of the Party (Red) that play both.
Outed
Outed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Outed that play both.
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
Savage Swing (Blue)
Savage Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Savage Swing (Blue) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Red)
Buckwild (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Buckwild (Red) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Yellow)
Buckwild (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Buckwild (Yellow) that play both.
New
Challenge the Alpha
Challenge the Alpha
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Challenge the Alpha that play both.
New
Dig In (Red)
Dig In (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Dig In (Red) that play both.
New
Dig In (Yellow)
Dig In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Dig In (Yellow) that play both.
New
Disarm
Disarm
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Disarm that play both.
New
Disembody
Disembody
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Disembody that play both.
New
Disperse
Disperse
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Disperse that play both.
New
Empowering Ruckus
Empowering Ruckus
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Empowering Ruckus that play both.
New
Good Natured Brutality
Good Natured Brutality
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Good Natured Brutality that play both.
New
Jaws of Victory
Jaws of Victory
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Jaws of Victory that play both.
Pack Call (Yellow)
Pack Call (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Pack Call (Yellow) that play both.
New
Rapturous Applause (Yellow)
Rapturous Applause (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Rapturous Applause (Yellow) that play both.
New
Reckless Stampede
Reckless Stampede
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Reckless Stampede that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Red)
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Tough Smashup (Blue) that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Tough Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
New
Turn the Crowd Grateful (Yellow)
Turn the Crowd Grateful (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Turn the Crowd Grateful (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Blue)
Razor Reflex (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Razor Reflex (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Reckless Swing that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and That All You Got? that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Yellow)
Sink Below (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Sink Below (Yellow) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Yellow)
Unmovable (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Unmovable (Yellow) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Block
New
Disdainful Delight
Disdainful Delight
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Disdainful Delight that play both.
Instant
New
Visit the Boneyard
Visit the Boneyard
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Visit the Boneyard that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Remembrance that play both.
New
Numbskull Charm
Numbskull Charm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Numbskull Charm that play both.
Resource
New
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bark Obscenities and Authority of Ataya that play both.