Story Beats (Red)
Guardian Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks or defends, you may put a suspense counter on, or remove one from, an aura of suspense you control.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.373.367755703
Average Defense Value: Β
2.542.540106915
Hero
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
New
Pleiades, Superstar
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Pleiades, Superstar that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Lyath Goldmane that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Equipment
Rampart of the Ram's Head
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Nullrune Boots
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Craterhoof
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Nullrune Robe
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Tectonic Plating
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Crater Fist
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Hoarding of Denial
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Hoarding of Denial that play both.
Seasoned Saviour
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Seasoned Saviour that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blood Drop Brocade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Blood Drop Brocade that play both.
Bunker Beard
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Bunker Beard that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Fisticuffs
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Fisticuffs that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Action
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Stamp Authority
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Stamp Authority that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Nerves of Steel
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Nerves of Steel that play both.
Tit for Tat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Tit for Tat that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Channel the Bleak Expanse
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Channel the Bleak Expanse that play both.
Polar Blast (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Polar Blast (Blue) that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Leave a Dent that play both.
Blessing of Patience (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Blessing of Patience (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Yellow) that play both.
Embolden (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Embolden (Blue) that play both.
Embolden (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Embolden (Yellow) that play both.
Never Yield
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Never Yield that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Visit Anvilheim
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Visit Anvilheim that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Sloggism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Sloggism (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Lead with Heart (Yellow) that play both.
Stacked in Your Favor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Stacked in Your Favor (Yellow) that play both.
Towering Titan (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Towering Titan (Blue) that play both.
Towering Titan (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Towering Titan (Red) that play both.
Towering Titan (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Towering Titan (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Blanch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Blanch (Blue) that play both.
Sloggism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Sloggism (Blue) that play both.
Stonewall Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Stonewall Confidence (Red) that play both.
Embolden (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Embolden (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Aftershock (Red) that play both.
Blinding of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Blinding of the Old Ones that play both.
Break Stature
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Break Stature that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Renounce Grandeur
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Renounce Grandeur that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Mangle that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Crash Down the Gates (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Crash Down the Gates (Blue) that play both.
Crash Down the Gates (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Crash Down the Gates (Yellow) that play both.
Grind Them Down (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Grind Them Down (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Little Big Foot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Little Big Foot (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Little Big Foot (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Little Big Foot (Yellow) that play both.
Bingo
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Bingo that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Crush Confidence (Yellow) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Walk the Plank (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Walk the Plank (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Thump (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Thump (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Razor Reflex (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Exposed to the Elements
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Exposed to the Elements that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Oasis Respite (Yellow) that play both.
Steadfast (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Steadfast (Blue) that play both.
Steadfast (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Steadfast (Red) that play both.
Steadfast (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Steadfast (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Withstand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Withstand (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Eye of Ophidia that play both.
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Story Beats (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.